On Wed, 20 Mar 2019 at 21:00, Simon King wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> On 2019-03-20, john_perry_usm wrote:
> > ...
> >
> > 2) In Catholic theology it is not actually "necessary" for Mary to be
> free
> > of original sin; rather, it is "fitting".
>
> Right, "fitting" may be the better wording. And
Hi John,
On 2019-03-20, john_perry_usm wrote:
> ...
>
> 2) In Catholic theology it is not actually "necessary" for Mary to be free
> of original sin; rather, it is "fitting".
Right, "fitting" may be the better wording. And concerning the necessity of
the doctrine of immaculate conception: 13th
To follow up on Simon King's mostly correct answer:
1) The joke I was trying to make is that it's "immaculate" only if it's
free of all bugs.
2) In Catholic theology it is not actually "necessary" for Mary to be free
of original sin; rather, it is "fitting".
john perry
On Wednesday, March
Hi Emmanuel,
On 2019-03-20, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote:
> Nice one, Simon ! I'm sorely tempted to mark is as "best answer":-)...
No, it was off-topic. But when a question is raised, I generally try to
answer.
Cheers,
Simon
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
On Wednesday, March 20, 2019 at 4:37:49 AM UTC-7, Emmanuel Charpentier
wrote:
>
> But I wont, because I tend to think that, as long as we are insisting on
> explicit creation of symbolic variables,
>
An argument that has been used in that context is that in "f(x)=sin(x)" the
`x` does occur on
Hi Simon,
Yes, that's what I meant. I see it as a problem because if you had a python
variable x, it will be overwritten by the symbolic value.
Isuru
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019, 4:25 AM Simon King wrote:
> Hi Isuru,
>
> On 2019-03-19, Isuru Fernando wrote:
> > If the sage preparser did something
Nice one, Simon ! I'm sorely tempted to mark is as "best answer":-)...
But I wont, because I tend to think that, as long as we are insisting on
explicit creation of symbolic variables, restricting the use of automatic
declaration to the (old) (deprecated) Sage notebook and continue to make
Thanks Simon
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 2:19 PM Simon King wrote:
> On 2019-03-20, Deepak Pawar wrote:
> > looking for the plotting tutorials in 2D and 3D in sagemath. Can anyone
> > suggest me the good resources or link for the same?
>
> Hi Deepak,
>
> this thread is about a totally different
On 2019-03-20, Deepak Pawar wrote:
> looking for the plotting tutorials in 2D and 3D in sagemath. Can anyone
> suggest me the good resources or link for the same?
Hi Deepak,
this thread is about a totally different topic. Next time please open a
new thread when you want to discuss a new topic.
Hi Henri,
On 2019-03-19, henri.gir...@gmail.com wrote:
> What is the difference between virginal conception and immaculate
> conception ?
"Virginal conception" in the context of Christian dogmatics concerns how
Jesus was conceived. "Immaculate conception" concerns how Jesus' *mother*
was
looking for the plotting tutorials in 2D and 3D in sagemath. Can anyone
suggest me the good resources or link for the same?
Thank you
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 4:32 AM Isuru Fernando wrote:
> If the sage preparser did something like,
>
> __tmp__ = SR.var("x, y"); __tmp_g__ = lambda x, y:
>
Hi Isuru,
On 2019-03-19, Isuru Fernando wrote:
> If the sage preparser did something like,
>
> __tmp__ = SR.var("x, y"); __tmp_g__ = lambda x, y:
> symbolic_expression(x+y**Integer(2)).function(x,y); f = __tmp_g__(*__tmp__)
>
> for
>
> f(x, y) = x + y ** 2
>
> you wouldn't have this problem and
If the sage preparser did something like,
__tmp__ = SR.var("x, y"); __tmp_g__ = lambda x, y:
symbolic_expression(x+y**Integer(2)).function(x,y); f = __tmp_g__(*__tmp__)
for
f(x, y) = x + y ** 2
you wouldn't have this problem and it should be easy enough to change in
the preparsesr.
Isuru
On
Hi John,
What is the difference between virginal conception and immaculate
conception ?
I notice that sagemath can even cogitate in philosophy : Really a swiss
knife ?
I don't believe in spontaneous generation ! lol
Henri
Le 19/03/2019 à 18:38, john_perry_usm a écrit :
Apologies for the
Apologies for the pedantry, but unless the indeterminates so generated are
free of all bugs, then strictly speaking this is not immaculate conception;
it is spontaneous generation, or perhaps virginal conception. ;-)
john perry
On Tuesday, March 19, 2019 at 6:52:19 AM UTC-5, Emmanuel
On Tuesday, March 19, 2019 at 4:52:19 AM UTC-7, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote:
>
> Defining a symbolic function seems to declare its arguments. Is this
> expected ?
>
It's certainly explicit programmed:
sage: preparse("f(x)=1")
'__tmp__=var("x"); f = symbolic_expression(Integer(1)).function(x)
On
Hi Emmanuel,
On 2019-03-19, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> On 2019-03-19 12:52, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote:
>> Defining a symbolic function seems to declare its arguments.
>
> I tend to think that everything on the left of the '=' sign in an
> assignment is stuff that is assigned to. So
>
>(a, b,
17 matches
Mail list logo
