This can of course be written (not g.is_forest() and g.has_even_cycle())
Ok, ok, I know... Let's make it g.is_forest() or g.has_even_cycle()
^^;
Nathann
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 9:40 PM, Nathann Cohen nathann.co...@gmail.com wrote:
This can of course be written (not g.is_forest() and g.has_even_cycle())
Ok, ok, I know... Let's make it g.is_forest() or g.has_even_cycle()
Yes, one could create an infix operator, but I think the above is much
more
Yes, one could create an infix operator, but I think the above is much
more clear than having to learn yet more notation.
Explicit is better than implicit.
Simple is better than complex.
Indeed, but I often use the trick sum( some_list_of_booleans ) to
count the number of True. I was afraid