What about to use polynomial division to get polynomial q=Q/p and then
return P/q ?
I do not remember the command for polynomial division, but should be
in the manual or help.
Robert
On 4 zář, 05:54, Cary Cherng cche...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a rational function P(x)/Q(x) with numerators and
On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 3:25 AM, ma...@mendelu.cz ma...@mendelu.cz wrote:
What about to use polynomial division to get polynomial q=Q/p and then
return P/q ?
I do not remember the command for polynomial division, but should be
in the manual or help.
If Q and p are polynomials, polynomial
I should have given the original full context. These polynomials P,Q,
and p are all in Z[x1,...,xn]. They are all multivariate.
On Sep 3, 8:54 pm, Cary Cherng cche...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a rational function P(x)/Q(x) with numerators and denominators
of very large degree. From the context I
And thats another problem. How do I tell sage to give me the
denominator of this rational function?
On Sep 4, 3:25 am, ma...@mendelu.cz ma...@mendelu.cz wrote:
What about to use polynomial division to get polynomial q=Q/p and then
return P/q ?
I do not remember the command for polynomial
On Sep 4, 2010, at 13:54 , Cary Cherng wrote:
And thats another problem. How do I tell sage to give me the
denominator of this rational function?
In general, the .denominator and .numerator methods will (should) give
you the components of a rational element.
HTH
Justin
--
Justin C.
.denominator() gave me 1. Sage prints out the rational function as R1
+ .. + R2 where Ri is a rational function and each having a different
denominator. Sage doesn't seem to be automatically writing this as one
fraction with a common denominator, could that be the reason it is
returning 1 for the
Ok i think I've resolved my problems by avoiding var for declaring
variables and instead using
R.g17,g19,g27,g29,g37,g38,g47,g48,g58,g59,g68,g69 =
PolynomialRing(QQ)
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 7:00 PM, Cary Cherng cche...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok i think I've resolved my problems by avoiding var for declaring
variables and instead using
R.g17,g19,g27,g29,g37,g38,g47,g48,g58,g59,g68,g69 =
PolynomialRing(QQ)
Yes, that should be orders of magnitude faster than doing
