Okay, thanks very much for all your prompt and helpful replies!
On 30 March 2017 at 09:42, Ralf Stephan wrote:
> On Thursday, March 30, 2017 at 10:38:49 AM UTC+2, Brent Pym wrote:
>>
>> Thank you very much! By opening these tickets, you have certainly
>> answered my
On Thursday, March 30, 2017 at 10:38:49 AM UTC+2, Brent Pym wrote:
>
> Thank you very much! By opening these tickets, you have certainly
> answered my questions. Is the etiquette to mark this thread as complete
> now, or wait until the tickets have been closed?
>
Threads in sage-devel or
Thank you very much! By opening these tickets, you have certainly answered
my questions. Is the etiquette to mark this thread as complete now, or
wait until the tickets have been closed?
On Thursday, 30 March 2017 08:58:07 UTC+1, Ralf Stephan wrote:
>
> I also opened
I also opened https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/22713
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this
On Thursday, March 30, 2017 at 9:08:24 AM UTC+2, Brent Pym wrote:
> Do I understand correctly that multiple polylogs and multiple zeta values
are implemented in GiNaC/Pynac but not yet wrapped in SageMath?
They are in GiNaC but the code in Pynac is degenerated for various reasons,
eg the
Also, I realized that, more generally, conjugate passes through sin because
of the holomorphicity:
sage: conjugate(sin(1+I))
sin(-I + 1)
Maybe this would be nice for other holomorphic functions, like zeta? But
perhaps that's how you had in mind to implement it anyways.
--
You received this
>
> Yes, the elementary functions had this implemented only recently, and I'm
> happy to add more knowledge like that.
>
Great, thanks a lot!
Do I understand correctly that multiple polylogs and multiple zeta values
are implemented in GiNaC/Pynac but not yet wrapped in SageMath?
--
You
On Tuesday, March 28, 2017 at 7:44:14 PM UTC+2, kcrisman wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, March 28, 2017 at 10:15:22 AM UTC-4, Brent Pym wrote:
>>
>> For a real number *s*, the value* zeta(s)* of the Riemann zeta function
>> is real, but SageMath does not seem to recognize this fact. Here is an
>>
On Tuesday, March 28, 2017 at 10:15:22 AM UTC-4, Brent Pym wrote:
>
> For a real number *s*, the value* zeta(s)* of the Riemann zeta function
> is real, but SageMath does not seem to recognize this fact. Here is an
> example (SageMath 7.5.1):
>
> sage: conjugate(zeta(3))
> conjugate(zeta(3))