On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 8:05 PM, Rolando wrote:
>
> Could you please explain why the license should be GPL and the code
> should be copyrighted?
Any tangable "creative work" is copyrighted by its author in all countries
which obey the Berne convention. In the US you can revoke copyright
by stat
Could you please explain why the license should be GPL and the code
should be copyrighted?
On Apr 14, 9:45 am, mabshoff wrote:
> On Apr 13, 4:40 pm, Rolando wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > Is it possible to make a contribution of code to Sage which has no
> > license and no copyright?
>
> No, it should be
On Apr 13, 4:40 pm, Rolando wrote:
Hi,
> Is it possible to make a contribution of code to Sage which has no
> license and no copyright?
No, it should be licensed in a GPL V2+ compatible way.
> The Sage Programming Guide seems to suggest that copyright should be
> given to yourself and Willi
