On Nov 24, 5:11 pm, Alexander Dreyer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello William and Michael,
This looks like a 64 bit SuSE 10.1 box - am I correct?
Yes.
Also, do you have GMP installed system-wide? It could be
some broken weird GMP that confuses the mpfi build
script.
Yes, GMP
On Nov 23, 9:15 am, Alexander Dreyer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Alexander,
sage-2.8.13 fails to build on the following system:
Linux node179 2.6.16.27-0.6-smp-perfctr #2 SMP Thu Oct 11 10:04:48
CEST 2007 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
This looks like a 64 bit SuSE 10.1 box - am I
On Nov 23, 2007 4:38 AM, mabshoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 23, 9:15 am, Alexander Dreyer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Alexander,
sage-2.8.13 fails to build on the following system:
Linux node179 2.6.16.27-0.6-smp-perfctr #2 SMP Thu Oct 11 10:04:48
CEST 2007 x86_64 x86_64
Dear Michael,
On Nov 22, 11:25 am, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dortmund.de wrote:
1) The upgrade was interactive. At some point, vim opened, and apparently
i was supposed to insert some text. Is there some hg commit involved
in the upgrading process?
This is because you have local
William Stein wrote:
Hello folks,
2.8.14 is planned for next week, depending on how close the release
will be to Sage Bug Day 6 on November 2nd, 2007 we might do another
December 2nd?
Jaap
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to
On Nov 21, 2007 4:04 PM, Jaap Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
William Stein wrote:
Hello folks,
2.8.14 is planned for next week, depending on how close the release
will be to Sage Bug Day 6 on November 2nd, 2007 we might do another
December 2nd?
Is there something wrong with you time
William Stein wrote:
On Nov 21, 2007 4:04 PM, Jaap Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
William Stein wrote:
Hello folks,
2.8.14 is planned for next week, depending on how close the release
will be to Sage Bug Day 6 on November 2nd, 2007 we might do another
December 2nd?
Is there something