Yes Vincent, that sounds much better,
Cheers,
Nishan
On Saturday, 4 October 2014 05:21:15 UTC-4, vdelecroix wrote:
Hello,
Is it better worded as follows?
The issue: plot(h(x), 0, 4) plots the line y=x−2, not the multi-line
function defined by h. The reason? In the command plot(h(x), 0,
Dear Nishan,
I created a ticket for that, you can have a look at:
http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17107
Hopefully, this will be corrected in the next release of Sage.
Thanks for the report!
Vincent
2014-10-06 20:53 UTC+02:00, NahsiN nishan.singh.m...@gmail.com:
Yes Vincent, that sounds much
Hello,
Is it better worded as follows?
The issue: plot(h(x), 0, 4) plots the line y=x−2, not the multi-line
function defined by h. The reason? In the command plot(h(x), 0, 4),
first h(x) is evaluated: this means plugging the symbolic variable x
into the function h. The inequality x 2 evaluates
It looks right to me.
I am not a native English speaker so I could be (very) wrong, but I
understand that the comparison x2 is evaluated, which is completely true,
independently if the condition is evaluated as True or False. In fact, next
lines tell why x2 is evaluated False and that h(x)
Le mercredi 1 octobre 2014 22:06:50 UTC+2, NahsiN a écrit :
Hello, I don't know where to post this so redirect me as needed. I believe
I have found a typo in the sage tutorial. Under Sage Tutorial v6.3 A
Guided Tour Some Common Issues with Functions we have the lines
def h(x):
if
@slelievre I was just pointing out what I think is a typo.
@slelievre You are right, the clause after the statement clarifies the
situation. When a symbolic equation is evaluated, as in the definition of h,
if it is not obviously true, then it returns False. Thus h(x) evaluates to
x-2, and this
