I was confused by this, and I wouldn't consider myself a total
newcomer -- maybe a partial newcomer. It seems like a checksum or hash
could be check at the very least to compare the file or URL give at
the command line and the cached file before anything is unpacked and
installed.
--
Benjamin
I'm not sure if it's me, but the spkg at:
http://www.uwosh.edu/faculty_staff/gutow/Jmol_for_SageNoteBook-1.1.4.spkg
seems to be corrupted now. I upgraded my Sage to 4.6.2.rc1 and ran ./
sage -f above URL and I get error messages saying the archive is
invalid. I ran the same command but pointed
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 8:23 AM, Benjamin Jones benjaminfjo...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure if it's me, but the spkg at:
http://www.uwosh.edu/faculty_staff/gutow/Jmol_for_SageNoteBook-1.1.4.spkg
seems to be corrupted now. I upgraded my Sage to 4.6.2.rc1 and ran ./
sage -f above URL and I get
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 11:20 AM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 8:23 AM, Benjamin Jones benjaminfjo...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm not sure if it's me, but the spkg at:
http://www.uwosh.edu/faculty_staff/gutow/Jmol_for_SageNoteBook-1.1.4.spkg
seems to be corrupted
On Thursday, March 3, 2011 6:19:01 PM UTC, Benjamin Jones wrote:
You're right, it's not corrupted. I had to manually delete the .spkg
file in $SAGE_ROOT/spkg/optional and then run `./sage -f URL` again.
I consider this to be a bug in addition to a major trap for newcomers to
fall into. If I
On Mar 3, 1:32 pm, Volker Braun vbraun.n...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday, March 3, 2011 6:19:01 PM UTC, Benjamin Jones wrote:
You're right, it's not corrupted. I had to manually delete the .spkg
file in $SAGE_ROOT/spkg/optional and then run `./sage -f URL` again.
I consider this to be a
Hopefully good. On the other hand, using a beta version of Chrome and a
not-yet-fully-reviewed jmol spkg could possibly see hangups. Nothing like
living on the edge, though! It would be useful if you could give some input
into the review of the jmol ticket too (I see you already
On 2/25/11 11:04 PM, William Stein wrote:
Hi,
I'm curious if anybody has a clue how to get Sage JMOL 3d graphics in
the notebook to work with either the released 9.x or beta 10.x
versions of the Google Chrome browser under OS X. I've tried both
the standard jmol that comes with sage-4.6.1 and
On 2/25/11 11:04 PM, William Stein wrote:
Hi,
I'm curious if anybody has a clue how to get Sage JMOL 3d graphics in
the notebook to work with either the released 9.x or beta 10.x
versions of the Google Chrome browser under OS X. I've tried both
the standard jmol that comes with sage-4.6.1 and
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 9:14 PM, Jason Grout
jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 2/25/11 11:04 PM, William Stein wrote:
Hi,
I'm curious if anybody has a clue how to get Sage JMOL 3d graphics in
the notebook to work with either the released 9.x or beta 10.x
versions of the Google Chrome
On 2/25/11 11:21 PM, William Stein wrote:
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 9:14 PM, Jason Grout
jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 2/25/11 11:04 PM, William Stein wrote:
Hi,
I'm curious if anybody has a clue how to get Sage JMOL 3d graphics in
the notebook to work with either the released 9.x or
I'm using OSX + Chrome (9.0.597.102) and Jmol hasn't worked in the
notebook for me for a while. I don't remember when it started to not
work. There was a post on sage-support about this a while back and no
one had an answer. I searched through the Jmol support list for 10 or
20 mins and didn't
Hi,
In contrast to my previous report, suddenly somehow using OS X +
beta Chrome (10.0.648.114 beta) and the new version of the jmol
package all *do* work fine together. I don't know why this suddenly
starting work -- perhaps I had to restart something. In any case,
this will be good for my
On 2/26/11 1:14 AM, William Stein wrote:
Hi,
In contrast to my previous report, suddenly somehow using OS X +
beta Chrome (10.0.648.114 beta) and the new version of the jmol
package all *do* work fine together. I don't know why this suddenly
starting work -- perhaps I had to restart
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 11:26 PM, Jason Grout
jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 2/26/11 1:14 AM, William Stein wrote:
Hi,
In contrast to my previous report, suddenly somehow using OS X +
beta Chrome (10.0.648.114 beta) and the new version of the jmol
package all *do* work fine together.
15 matches
Mail list logo
