On Friday, April 7, 2017 at 5:18:34 PM UTC+1, Chris Seberino wrote:
>
> I have no doubt you know about group theory and math in general more than
> me. I have no doubt
> your answer is defensible and accurate.
>
> What I'm concerned about is the young students and what they expect to see
> w
I have no doubt you know about group theory and math in general more than
me. I have no doubt
your answer is defensible and accurate.
What I'm concerned about is the young students and what they expect to see
when
they type factor( ... ).
cs
On Friday, April 7, 2017 at 9:56:31 AM UTC-5, pro
Just try :
-
Z_T, t = ZZ['x'].objgen()
print factor(6*t+3)
print factor(6*x+3)
-
You will se that you need to use the right ring of polynomials.
C.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"s
No
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com.
Hello
Havr you try to work with ZZ[X] ?
Le 6 avr. 2017 17:47, "Chris Seberino" a écrit :
> Why factor(6*x+3) doesn't give 3*(2*x+1) ?
>
> Thanks!
>
> cs
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "sage-support" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group an
Why factor(6*x+3) doesn't give 3*(2*x+1) ?
Thanks!
cs
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to thi
