Re: [sage-support] compile problem for sage 9.2.b9 on mac 11.0 big sur

2020-09-17 Thread Dima Pasechnik
the top level config.log will tell you why ./configure did not accept pre-installed readline. probably you forgot to source .homebrew... before ./configure (afk, so don't recall the exact file name, but it is the only one that starts with '.' and has homebrew in) On Thu, 17 Sep 2020,

Re: [sage-support] compile problem for sage 9.2.b9 on mac 11.0 big sur

2020-09-17 Thread David Joyner
On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 8:24 AM Dima Pasechnik wrote: > try upgrading to the latest readline (8.0.4), e.g. install as much as > possible from Homebrew, > which has this version working. > > Done wdj@jeeves sage-9.2.beta12 % brew upgrade readline Warning: You are using macOS 11.0. We do not

Re: [sage-support] compile problem for sage 9.2.b9 on mac 11.0 big sur

2020-09-17 Thread Dima Pasechnik
try upgrading to the latest readline (8.0.4), e.g. install as much as possible from Homebrew, which has this version working. On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 1:09 PM David Joyner wrote: > > > > On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 6:54 AM Dima Pasechnik wrote: >> >> in the log you attached the failure is in

Re: [sage-support] compile problem for sage 9.2.b9 on mac 11.0 big sur

2020-09-17 Thread Dima Pasechnik
in the log you attached the failure is in python3, and it's dated Aug 22 On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 11:12 AM David Joyner wrote: > > I downloaded sage 9.2.b12 then ran configure and make using newly upgraded > Xcode 12. > Instead of failing at python it fails at readline. The log is attached. >

Re: [sage-support] compile problem for sage 9.2.b9 on mac 11.0 big sur

2020-09-02 Thread Matthias Koeppe
I also see build failures of at least some of these packages at https://github.com/mkoeppe/sage/runs/1059961873 (using a new GH workflow that runs Xcode 12 beta, added in https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30487) I have opened https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30494 "Meta-ticket: Support Xcode

Re: [sage-support] compile problem for sage 9.2.b9 on mac 11.0 big sur

2020-09-02 Thread John H Palmieri
With a system Python and "make -k", the following packages fail: gf2x ecm symmetrica rubiks ecl scipy On Tuesday, September 1, 2020 at 10:29:52 PM UTC-7 Matthias Koeppe wrote: > These lines: > > configure:17396: checking build system compiler gcc > > etc. > might indicate that the configure

Re: [sage-support] compile problem for sage 9.2.b9 on mac 11.0 big sur

2020-09-01 Thread Matthias Koeppe
These lines: configure:17396: checking build system compiler gcc etc. might indicate that the configure script is confused about cross compiling to a different architecture. On Tuesday, September 1, 2020 at 9:59:59 PM UTC-7, John H Palmieri wrote: > > > > On Tuesday, September 1, 2020 at

Re: [sage-support] compile problem for sage 9.2.b9 on mac 11.0 big sur

2020-09-01 Thread John H Palmieri
On Tuesday, September 1, 2020 at 9:52:37 PM UTC-7 Matthias Koeppe wrote: > On Tuesday, September 1, 2020 at 8:59:14 PM UTC-7, John H Palmieri wrote: > >> If I do install Python 3.7, then gf2x and ecm both fail to build. The >> gf2x log file says "configure: error: Cannot find a build system

Re: [sage-support] compile problem for sage 9.2.b9 on mac 11.0 big sur

2020-09-01 Thread Matthias Koeppe
On Tuesday, September 1, 2020 at 8:59:14 PM UTC-7, John H Palmieri wrote: > > If I do install Python 3.7, then gf2x and ecm both fail to build. The gf2x > log file says "configure: error: Cannot find a build system compiler > ". The ecm log file says "checking if globals are prefixed by >

Re: [sage-support] compile problem for sage 9.2.b9 on mac 11.0 big sur

2020-09-01 Thread Matthias Koeppe
This fix was already merged in 3.8.4, so after https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/27754 we should be fine. The PR for Python 3.7 is https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/21155, but our Python 3.7.x is very old already. On Tuesday, September 1, 2020 at 9:43:15 PM UTC-7, Matthias Koeppe wrote: >

Re: [sage-support] compile problem for sage 9.2.b9 on mac 11.0 big sur

2020-09-01 Thread Matthias Koeppe
The issue with "posixmodule" is apparently https://bugs.python.org/issue41100 On Tuesday, September 1, 2020 at 8:59:14 PM UTC-7, John H Palmieri wrote: > > If I do install Python 3.7, then gf2x and ecm both fail to build. The gf2x > log file says "configure: error: Cannot find a build system

Re: [sage-support] compile problem for sage 9.2.b9 on mac 11.0 big sur

2020-09-01 Thread John H Palmieri
If I do install Python 3.7, then gf2x and ecm both fail to build. The gf2x log file says "configure: error: Cannot find a build system compiler ". The ecm log file says "checking if globals are prefixed by underscore... configure: error: Test program links neither with nor without underscore."

Re: [sage-support] compile problem for sage 9.2.b9 on mac 11.0 big sur

2020-09-01 Thread John H Palmieri
I've been trying to build on Big Sur, too. I removed the MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET lines from sage-env, but the Python build still fails. The log file is attached. Any suggestions (besides installing a different system version of Python)? John On Saturday, August 22, 2020 at 3:44:01 PM UTC-7

Re: [sage-support] compile problem for sage 9.2.b9 on mac 11.0 big sur

2020-08-22 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 11:23 PM David Joyner wrote: > > > > On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 6:02 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote: >> >> On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 10:51 PM David Joyner wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 4:52 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote: >> >> >> >> On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 8:28 PM

Re: [sage-support] compile problem for sage 9.2.b9 on mac 11.0 big sur

2020-08-22 Thread David Joyner
On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 6:02 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote: > On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 10:51 PM David Joyner wrote: > > > > > > > > On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 4:52 PM Dima Pasechnik > wrote: > >> > >> On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 8:28 PM Dima Pasechnik > wrote: > >> > > >> > note: 'utimensat' has been

Re: [sage-support] compile problem for sage 9.2.b9 on mac 11.0 big sur

2020-08-22 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 10:51 PM David Joyner wrote: > > > > On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 4:52 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote: >> >> On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 8:28 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote: >> > >> > note: 'utimensat' has been marked as being introduced in macOS 10.13 >> > here, but the deployment target is

Re: [sage-support] compile problem for sage 9.2.b9 on mac 11.0 big sur

2020-08-22 Thread David Joyner
On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 4:52 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote: > On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 8:28 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > > note: 'utimensat' has been marked as being introduced in macOS 10.13 > > here, but the deployment target is macOS 10.9.0 > > > > seems to indicate that one has to properly set

Re: [sage-support] compile problem for sage 9.2.b9 on mac 11.0 big sur

2020-08-22 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 8:28 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > note: 'utimensat' has been marked as being introduced in macOS 10.13 > here, but the deployment target is macOS 10.9.0 > > seems to indicate that one has to properly set MACOS_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET > (or a suchlike thing) to 10.13 or even

Re: [sage-support] compile problem for sage 9.2.b9 on mac 11.0 big sur

2020-08-22 Thread Dima Pasechnik
note: 'utimensat' has been marked as being introduced in macOS 10.13 here, but the deployment target is macOS 10.9.0 seems to indicate that one has to properly set MACOS_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET (or a suchlike thing) to 10.13 or even bigger. On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 8:06 PM David Joyner wrote: > > Hi: