Re: [sage-support] possible bug in sage 5.11 SR operations...

2013-08-28 Thread Burcin Erocal
On Tue, 27 Aug 2013 11:11:35 -0700 (PDT) Emmanuel Charpentier emanuel.charpent...@gmail.com wrote: Dear Burcin, dear list Le mardi 27 août 2013 11:16:18 UTC+2, Burcin Erocal a écrit : On Sat, 24 Aug 2013 14:16:01 -0700 (PDT) Emmanuel Charpentier emanuel.c...@gmail.com javascript:

Re: [sage-support] possible bug in sage 5.11 SR operations...

2013-08-27 Thread Burcin Erocal
On Sat, 24 Aug 2013 14:16:01 -0700 (PDT) Emmanuel Charpentier emanuel.charpent...@gmail.com wrote: Dear list, Setup : sage 5.11 on Debian amd64 self-compiled (Debian's compilers and tuned Atlas library) trying to put on paper the elementary proof that the convolution of two normals is a

Re: [sage-support] possible bug in sage 5.11 SR operations...

2013-08-27 Thread Emmanuel Charpentier
Dear Burcin, dear list Le mardi 27 août 2013 11:16:18 UTC+2, Burcin Erocal a écrit : On Sat, 24 Aug 2013 14:16:01 -0700 (PDT) Emmanuel Charpentier emanuel.c...@gmail.com javascript: wrote: Dear list, [ Snip.. ] h=g(x,m1,m2,s1,s2) # to get a symbolic expression print

[sage-support] possible bug in sage 5.11 SR operations...

2013-08-24 Thread Emmanuel Charpentier
Dear list, Setup : sage 5.11 on Debian amd64 self-compiled (Debian's compilers and tuned Atlas library) trying to put on paper the elementary proof that the convolution of two normals is a normal, I stumbled on what I think to be a disastrous bug. What follows is shown in text mode, but