Jori, are you using Jonathan Gutow's branch for proxying? If so, that
would be great - I hope to work on sagenb updating later today.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails
On Tue, 17 Nov 2015, kcrisman wrote:
Jori, are you using Jonathan Gutow's branch for proxying?
No.
I rearranged things. We have now a) redirection http://sage.our.unit ->
https://sage.our.unit and b) documentation online at
http://sage-doc.our.unit.
This seems to now work. Apache is used
On Tue, 17 Nov 2015, Gabriel Cardona wrote:
I evaluate it and hide the output, but when I open the worksheet again the
'2' is not hidden (I want my students to open the worksheet and evaluate the
expression themselves).
Can you just use Action / Delete All Output?
--
Jori Mäntysalo
Hi,
I have also just encountered the incorrect sign for BooleanFunction
walsh_hadamard_transform().
In addition, I would like to point out that the documentation at
http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/reference/cryptography/sage/crypto/boolean_function.html
agrees with the usual definition and not
Hi all,
I am preparing a worksheet for my students and have found a problem about
hiding output.
To put it simple, assume I have a single line in my worksheet:
1+1
I evaluate it and hide the output, but when I open the worksheet again the
'2' is not hidden (I want my students to open the
Kind of a weird error, the configure script that comes with BRiAl seems to
think that the built in version of python2-2.7 is too old. Not sure where
to go from here.
checking if g++ supports -c -o file.o... yes
checking if g++ supports -c -o file.o... (cached) yes
checking whether the g++
I am reposting a comment I just added to the topic, "Fwd: error in Sage" in
the hopes that it will be more likely to be seen this way.
Hi,
I have also just encountered the incorrect sign for BooleanFunction
walsh_hadamard_transform().
In addition, I would like to point out that the
On 2015-11-17 06:14, Nils Bruin wrote:
It's very easy to write a sage program that's listening on one
pipe for input (in whatever format you require--you can make it binary
if you want) and write output on another, i.e. just a little server.
You could try to use 0MQ for this. It has bindings
Which OSX version is that? If you are not on the latest and greatest then
you do have unfixed serious security issues in your OS. If you are willing
to take that risk you can just install a sufficiently new Python version.
On Tuesday, November 17, 2015 at 10:03:44 AM UTC-5, Taylor Lee wrote:
