On Apr 23, 2010, at 1:37 AM, bb wrote:
Mike Hansen schrieb:
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 11:52 AM, bb bblo...@arcor.de wrote:
I get a runtime error, but just would expect infinity! Is there
something
wrong or any explanation?
This is because when you do 2^3^4^5 you are computing that number
On Apr 21, 2010, at 4:52 PM, Michael Rybalkin wrote:
I have installed local Sage server.
I need some kind of workspace with multiple worksheets and common data
storage while working via web interface. What can you recommend in
this case?
There aren't currently any good solutions to this
Actually it does not seem to work, I get
--
| Sage Version 4.3.4, Release Date: 2010-03-19 |
| Type notebook() for the GUI, and license() for information.|
On Apr 24, 2010, at 11:32 PM, Alex P wrote:
Actually it does not seem to work, I get
--
| Sage Version 4.3.4, Release Date: 2010-03-19 |
| Type notebook() for the GUI, and license() for information.
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 10:22 PM, Robert Bradshaw
rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
On Apr 24, 2010, at 5:36 PM, Michael Rybalkin wrote:
How to get monomial with large exponent in the polynomial rings?
For example I hsave polynomial ring over large finite field:
p = next_prime(10^20)
R.x
Hi,
Suppose f1, f2,,f10 are polynomials over 20 variables over integers.
How one can check weather they are linearly independent or not in Sage?
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
Hi,
No, my polynomials are not homogeneous and are of different degree. Suppose:
R.x1,x2,x3=ZZ[]
f1=1+x1+x2+x1*x2
f2=1+x1+x3+x1*x3
I want to find linear dependence of the set polynomials {f1,f2,f1*f2,
x1*f2,x2*f2}
With regards,
Santanu
On 25 April 2010 15:33, Simon King
Hi!
On 25 Apr., 12:26, Santanu Sarkar sarkar.santanu@gmail.com
wrote:
I want to find linear dependence of the set polynomials {f1,f2,f1*f2,
x1*f2,x2*f2}
'Linear over ZZ' or 'linear over R'?
If it is the latter, the following might help (but is only implemented
if you have polynomials over
On 25 Apr., 12:50, Santanu Sarkar sarkar.santanu@gmail.com
wrote:
Sorry again. Dependency needs over integer.
Probably there is a better way of doing it, but the following works:
Transform the problem into a matrix: One row for each polynomial, one
column for each monomial that occurs in
Thank you very much for your kind help.
On 25 April 2010 17:00, Simon King simon.k...@nuigalway.ie wrote:
On 25 Apr., 12:50, Santanu Sarkar sarkar.santanu@gmail.com
wrote:
Sorry again. Dependency needs over integer.
Probably there is a better way of doing it, but the following works:
operator precedence
sage: 3==3+1
False
Correct, because concerning to the perecedence list on
http://www.sagemath.org/doc/tutorial/appendix.html + has a higher
precedence than ==. The text says, that the table is based on the table
in § 5.14 of the /Python Language Reference Manual/, but
Spammer? Should we block this guy?
On Sunday, April 25, 2010, martin...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there an need for more open source math tools in
for-profit companies? If so, would targeted training and support help meet
this need while benefiting the open source
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 5:53 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
Spammer? Should we block this guy?
I banned him. He did mention R and octave in his link
but not Sage. Legit surveys usually give a lengthy
explanation about how the info will be used etc. This one did not.
On Sunday,
13 matches
Mail list logo
