Re: [sage-support] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: error: setupterm: could not find terminal

2013-08-24 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2013-08-23 16:02, Volker Braun wrote: I see. The path is indeed hard-coded in libtinfo.so. Does setting the TERMINFO environment variable fix it? It should be set to $SAGE_LOCAL/share/terminfo -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sage-support group.

Re: Re: [sage-support] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: error: setupterm: could not find terminal

2013-08-24 Thread Martin Albrecht
Hi all, see http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15091 Cheers, Martin On Saturday 24 August 2013 10:14:42 Jeroen Demeyer wrote: On 2013-08-23 16:02, Volker Braun wrote: I see. The path is indeed hard-coded in libtinfo.so. Does setting the TERMINFO environment variable fix it? It should be

[sage-support] Definite integral disagrees with Maple and mathworld

2013-08-24 Thread Georgi Guninski
Don't claim this is a bug, but don't understand this. Define {x} the fractional part of x by (source mathworld): def fra1(x): fractional part return 1/2+I/(2*pi)*log(-exp(-2*pi*I*x)) sage: var('x') x sage: ii=integrate(fra1(1/x),x,1/2,1);ii log(2) According

[sage-support] possible bug in sage 5.11 SR operations...

2013-08-24 Thread Emmanuel Charpentier
Dear list, Setup : sage 5.11 on Debian amd64 self-compiled (Debian's compilers and tuned Atlas library) trying to put on paper the elementary proof that the convolution of two normals is a normal, I stumbled on what I think to be a disastrous bug. What follows is shown in text mode, but

[sage-support] Re: Definite integral disagrees with Maple and mathworld

2013-08-24 Thread JamesHDavenport
Well, the derivative of the fractional part is indeed 1 where it is defined, as lim((fra(x+eps)-fra(x))/eps)=lim(eps/eps)=1 unless adding eps crosses a boundary, which it won't do for eps small enough. Maxima (5.29) returns (4 pi log 2 + i log(-1) +pi)/(4 pi). Depending on the value of log(-1),