Re: [sage-support] Re: Cartesian n-product of set for given n

2014-08-19 Thread Jori Mantysalo
On Sun, 17 Aug 2014, Nathann Cohen wrote: Please, be respectful of other people's work and focus your hate on Sage's categories. The rest is quite fine :-P OK, I'll try to remember this. :=) And if you want the product of more complicated things (with sets of different size) you can use the

[sage-support] Poset.show() and inherited parameters

2014-08-19 Thread Jori Mantysalo
How should one find out what paremeters can be given to Poset.show()? Manual page http://www.sagemath.org/doc/reference/combinat/sage/combinat/posets/posets.html says nothing about, for example, figsize. And http://www.sagemath.org/doc/reference/plotting/sage/plot/plot.html says The default

Re: [sage-support] Re: Cartesian n-product of set for given n

2014-08-19 Thread Nathann Cohen
Yo ! Ah, seems to be quite a compact form! Yeah, but it only does what you want. Nothing involving more complicated objects like category functions do. But after two days of wondering I don't know how to generate all lower triangular matrices with non-zero elements taken from, say, [0,1].

Re: [sage-support] Re: Cartesian n-product of set for given n

2014-08-19 Thread Nathann Cohen
Yo ! Ah, seems to be quite a compact form! Yeah, but it only does what you want. Nothing involving more complicated objects like category functions do. But after two days of wondering I don't know how to generate all lower triangular matrices with non-zero elements taken from, say, [0,1].

[sage-support] Re: sage-6.3-x86_64-Darwin-OSX_10.6_x86_64-app.dmg won't be built?

2014-08-19 Thread Volker Braun
On Monday, August 18, 2014 10:45:02 PM UTC+1, kcrisman wrote: Maybe you want to review this ticket: http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16796 What Volker means by this is that he doesn't have access to a 10.6 buildbot to try this out. Apparently the machine that was there gave up the

Re: [sage-support] sage-6.3-x86_64-Darwin-OSX_10.6_x86_64-app.dmg won't be built?

2014-08-19 Thread William A Stein
On Tuesday, August 19, 2014, Volker Braun vbraun.n...@gmail.com wrote: On Monday, August 18, 2014 10:45:02 PM UTC+1, kcrisman wrote: Maybe you want to review this ticket: http://trac.sagemath.org/ ticket/16796 What Volker means by this is that he doesn't have access to a 10.6 buildbot to

[sage-support] Re: Symmetric polynomials over a ring of polynomials

2014-08-19 Thread slelievre
Le samedi 24 mai 2014 16:29:38 UTC+2, Tom Harris a écrit : Now I have some code to generate the polynomial which I am interested in, I store it as p: p = (output of some functions) ( p is ((x1^3 - 2*x1*x2 + x3)*c1^2 - (x1*x2 - x3)*c1 + x3)*c2^2 + x1^3 + c1^2*x3 - (x1*x2 - x3)*c1 -

[sage-support] Re: Overflow creating finite field element

2014-08-19 Thread Samuel Neves
That seems to be it. Thanks! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sage-support group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to