[sage-support] Re: NameError: name 'Integer' is not defined

2016-04-21 Thread kcrisman
Can you say exactly how you fired up the notebook? Was this a binary download, or a build from scratch? Hi > > sage 7.1, macosx 10.10.5, firefox 45.0.1 > > I can fire up sage from the command line and everything works fine, as far > as I can see. > > But nothing works in the notebook.

Re: [sage-support] Re: Problem installing database_gap-4.7.9 (sage-7.1)

2016-04-21 Thread Volker Braun
well you could build your own binary but then its easier to just compile... On Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 8:42:16 PM UTC+2, tdumont wrote: > > Le 21/04/2016 19:35, Volker Braun a écrit : > > Linking with gsl is a known problem for the binary, should be fixed in > 7.2 > > > > > Actually,

Re: [sage-support] Re: Problem installing database_gap-4.7.9 (sage-7.1)

2016-04-21 Thread Thierry Dumont
Le 21/04/2016 19:35, Volker Braun a écrit : Linking with gsl is a known problem for the binary, should be fixed in 7.2 Actually, using a compiled buymyself 7.2 version, I have no problem. No other solution than compiling? t.d. On Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 6:12:35 PM UTC+2, tdumont

[sage-support] Re: Sage or Mathemathica. Which one is correct?

2016-04-21 Thread Carl Eberhart
Try checking the value at zero. On Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 12:15:51 PM UTC-5, Rui Paulo wrote: > > In my Phd thesis, I'm having some trouble to calculating some tricky > integrals, Sage and Mathematica show different results. To understand what > goes I have calculated a simple integral. >

[sage-support] Re: Problem installing database_gap-4.7.9 (sage-7.1)

2016-04-21 Thread Volker Braun
Linking with gsl is a known problem for the binary, should be fixed in 7.2 On Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 6:12:35 PM UTC+2, tdumont wrote: > > Hello, > > On an Ubuntu 14-04 machine, I download a sage-7.1 binary version, > install... ok. > > The installation of database_gap-4.7.9 fails: > >

[sage-support] Re: Sage or Mathemathica. Which one is correct?

2016-04-21 Thread Harald Schilly
In your mathematica version, is "log10" a parameter with values from -8 to 8, while in sagemath you use it as a logarithm with basis 10. Is that how I read it or do I miss something obvious? -- h -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support"

[sage-support] Sage or Mathemathica. Which one is correct?

2016-04-21 Thread Rui Paulo
In my Phd thesis, I'm having some trouble to calculating some tricky integrals, Sage and Mathematica show different results. To understand what goes I have calculated a simple integral. At Sage:

[sage-support] Re: Problem installing database_gap-4.7.9 (sage-7.1)

2016-04-21 Thread Dima Pasechnik
the usual half-broken binary distributive, I suppose... On Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 5:12:35 PM UTC+1, tdumont wrote: > > Hello, > > On an Ubuntu 14-04 machine, I download a sage-7.1 binary version, > install... ok. > > The installation of database_gap-4.7.9 fails: > > sage -i