OK, embedding seems to work for Chrome and Firefox, so reported
regressions are fixed.
I am planning to switch main servers in 3 weeks. (Probably 7.2 will be
out by then, so I'll also see how easy it is to upgrade with the new
setup.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to
Made it work in Chrome via
https://github.com/sagemath/sagecell/commit/95d2b406026ea7efc73a91ef693a1dd9fb5946c6
(my attempts to create all wrappers using a loop were not successful)
Made some progress on CORS but there are still issues.
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 2:35 AM, Volker Braun
Hi there,
I would like to use a sage function (is_power_of) in an cython program I am
writing (via %cython in SMC). To speed things up I would like to import the
c version of is_power_of which can be found
in
https://github.com/sagemath/sage/blob/master/src/sage/rings/integer.pyx#L4271
as
> If you want speed to study it, implementing it yourself in Sage is (IMHO)
> a good idea because Sage has fairly good debugging facilities like a trace
> function, and you can compile parts of it via Cython.
>
Oops. Speaking of wrong impressions, I should qualify this statement: last
I
On Friday, April 29, 2016 at 1:07:31 PM UTC-5, saad khalid wrote:
>
> However, what are other things? And do you think it would actually be
> worthwhile? It's an algorhythm for calculating groebner bases. I don't know
> if that matter. I just didn't know if the language would give any sizable
ZZ and RDF have string representations as '123' and '123.456',
respectively. The analog for QQ is
sage: QQ('123/456')
41/152
On Sunday, May 1, 2016 at 4:14:42 AM UTC+2, kcrisman wrote:
>
> RDF('0.0') is fine
> QQ(RDF('0.0')) is fine
> QQ('0') is fine
>
That one is really just QQ(ZZ('0'))
