Re: [sage-support] Re: Inter-versions reproducibility problem of random elements.

The `random_element` method of `AA` was changed in https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30875 merged in Sage 9.5.rc0. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email

Re: [sage-support] Re: Eigen spaces of algebraic matrices broken ?

The `random_element` method of `AA` was changed in https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30875 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

Re: [sage-support] Re: Inter-versions reproducibility problem of random elements.

9.2 on Windows: sage: print(sage.version.version) : with seed(0): M = matrix(AA, 3, 3, lambda u,v: AA.random_element()) : M.apply_map(lambda u:u.radical_expression()) 9.2 [-2  2 -2] [-2  0  2] [-1  2  2] sagecell.sagemath.org: 9.4 [-2 2 -2] [-2 0 2] [-1 2 2] I'll try 9.3 on

[sage-support] Re: Inter-versions reproducibility problem of random elements.

Also : coud you report the results on as many platforms and/or versions as possible ? Le dimanche 6 février 2022 à 20:23:39 UTC+1, Emmanuel Charpentier a écrit : > Seen in this thread > : > > On Sagecell

[sage-support] Inter-versions reproducibility problem of random elements.

Seen in this thread : On Sagecell : print(sage.version.version) with seed(0): M = matrix(AA, 3, 3, lambda u,v: AA.random_element()) M.apply_map(lambda u:u.radical_expression()) prints 9.4 [-2 2 -2]

Re: [sage-support] Re: Eigen spaces of algebraic matrices broken ?

Nins and me got *different* random matrices : his was composed of integers in (-2..2), and Sage could compute its eigenspaces ; mine was : sage: with seed(0): M = matrix(AA, 3, 3, lambda u,v: AA.random_element()) sage: M.apply_map(lambda u:u.radical_expression()) [ -sqrt(2) - 1

Re: [sage-support] Re: Eigen spaces of algebraic matrices broken ?

No, it works with the 9.4 kernel but not with the 9.5 beta. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view

Re: [sage-support] Re: Eigen spaces of algebraic matrices broken ?

Is it the same M for 9.4 as for 9.5? On Sun, 6 Feb 2022, 10:52 'Alan Stafford' via sage-support, < sage-support@googlegroups.com> wrote: > My point is that it is the same on Apple Mac, that it isn't related to the > recent interface and multiprocessing problems but has just appeared with > the

[sage-support] Re: Eigen spaces of algebraic matrices broken ?

My point is that it is the same on Apple Mac, that it isn't related to the recent interface and multiprocessing problems but has just appeared with the 9.5 kernel beta release as it works with the 9.4 kernel. On Sunday, February 6, 2022 at 8:53:51 AM UTC Emmanuel Charpentier wrote: > That was

Re: [sage-support] Morphisms between free groups.

Now it seems "subs" does work. I must have done something wrong. Sorry for the noise. On Friday, February 4, 2022 at 3:55:19 PM UTC+1 dim...@gmail.com wrote: > > > On Fri, 4 Feb 2022, 11:02 David Joyner, wrote: > >> On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 4:40 AM 'Michel VAN DEN BERGH' via sage-support >>

[sage-support] Re: Eigen spaces of algebraic matrices broken ?

That was my initial complaint... ;-) Le samedi 5 février 2022 à 18:05:42 UTC+1, alan_thoma...@yahoo.co.uk a écrit : > M.eigenvalues() never returns. > On Saturday, February 5, 2022 at 11:48:47 AM UTC Emmanuel Charpentier > wrote: > >> What exactly fails in the example ? >> >> Le vendredi 4