Re: [sage-support] method .polynomial() gives unexpected answer

Apparently, this is caused by a problem in degree() which is used in polynomial(). In your example: sage: pol2.degree(q) 0 sage: pol2.degree(p) 3 You get the expected behavior if you bring q into pol2.parent() explicitly: sage: q=pol2.parent()(q) sage: pol2.degree(q),pol2.polynomial(q) (3,

Re: [sage-support] Re: method .polynomial() gives unexpected answer

and is working nicely. Should we report this error in any other place? Thank you again, Rafael On Jul 25, 4:42 pm, Julian Rüth julian.ru...@gmail.com wrote: Apparently, this is caused by a problem in degree() which is used in polynomial(). In your example: sage: pol2.degree(q) 0 sage

Re: [sage-support] Strange results with multivariate resultants

Hi, I'm not sure if I understand what is counterintuitive about the results. * Georgi Guninski gunin...@guninski.com [2012-09-18 16:55:37 +0300]: sage: K.x1,x2,x3=PolynomialRing(QQ) sage: p1=(x2-1)*(x3+2) sage: p2=(x2-1)*(x3+3) sage: p1.resultant(p2) 1 This is the resultant of p1 and p2

Re: [sage-support] Strange results with multivariate resultants

,p2,x1) %4 = 1 julian On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 05:22:59PM +0200, Julian Rüth wrote: Hi, I'm not sure if I understand what is counterintuitive about the results. * Georgi Guninski gunin...@guninski.com [2012-09-18 16:55:37 +0300]: sage: K.x1,x2,x3=PolynomialRing(QQ) sage: p1=(x2-1

Re: [sage-support] Bug in polynomia roots in Qp()

* Georgi Guninski gunin...@guninski.com [2013-11-14 12:01:44 +0200]: On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 09:39:58AM +, John Cremona wrote: On 14 November 2013 09:28, Georgi Guninski gunin...@guninski.com wrote: This appears a bug to me: sage:

[sage-support] Re: Solve inequality in Sage

Have you had a look at https://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/reference/numerical/sage/numerical/mip.html? Seems to be what you want to do essentially. julian On Sunday, October 20, 2019 at 5:34:37 PM UTC+2, Santanu wrote: > > Hi, > I have inequalities like these: > > 3 x1 + 5 x2 + 2 x3 + 5 x4 + 7

[sage-support] Re: Sage Crash Report: Missing symbols in conda build for macOS?

Hi Micheal, could you share the output of `conda list` for that environment? Feel free to open an issue for this at https://github.com/conda-forge/sage-feedstock/issues as well. julian On Tuesday, November 19, 2019 at 6:04:23 PM UTC+1, Michael Boyle wrote: > > I followed the installation

Re: [sage-support] Docker Hub images behind tags on Gitlab and Github

Hi, * Chase Meadors [2020-06-22 15:08:11 -0700]: > Is there some reason the Docker Hub repository is behind? thanks for notifying us about this problem. Usually the Docker images should just take a few hours after a tag is created. A few prereleases and the 9.1 release did not show up due to

Re: [sage-support] “python3.8” cannot be opened because the developer cannot be verified.

Hi Ishai, I don't know much about macOS but it seems that Apple Gatekeeper is not letting you run SageMath. Apparently, it can be disabled: https://its.uiowa.edu/support/article/4038 I have not tried but it might be that the SageMath distribution on conda-forge has a proper developer ID set,

Re: [sage-support] Availability of sage 9.6 through conda/mamba?

Hi Joseph, thanks for the notification. We had simply forgotten to update the sage package. We are now in the process of providing the sage 9.6 package for conda-forge at https://github.com/conda-forge/sage-feedstock/pull/77. * Joseph Nasser [2022-07-11 11:54:04 -0700]: > Is it possible to

Re: [sage-support] Building dockerfile with Sagemath9.5 as base image

* Rishabh Kumar [2022-07-27 09:32:26 -0600]: > Does the Latest docker image contain sagemath9.6? No. Latest is just 9.5 at the moment. I'll try to build 9.6 and push it to docker hub. julian -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group.