On May 30, 2009, at 11:40 AM, simon.k...@uni-jena.de wrote:
Dear Laurent,
I think the idea is that Sage is with batteries included and should
not interfere with anything that you have on your system. Namely,
since Sage is rather big, it is very probable that Sage ships
something that is
In the case where I'm using the test.sage trick, can I still import my
own modules
or have access to everything ?
I guess the answer is Yes, isn't ?
I've tried to import both sage and pygtk without success, both in
python and sage console. Please tell me if you can achieve this. I
guess you
On May 30, 2009, at 11:10 AM, pang wrote:
I've tried to import both sage and pygtk without success, both in
python and sage console. Please tell me if you can achieve this. I
guess you have to install the module within sage, even if it is
installed in the system, but outside sage.
Sage
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 11:10, pang pablo.ang...@uam.es wrote:
In the case where I'm using the test.sage trick, can I still import my
own modules
or have access to everything ?
I guess the answer is Yes, isn't ?
I've tried to import both sage and pygtk without success, both in
python
I've tried to import both sage and pygtk without success, both in
python and sage console. Please tell me if you can achieve this. I
guess you have to install the module within sage, even if it is
installed in the system, but outside sage.
The same here :
#! /usr/bin/sage -python
#
Dear Laurent,
I think the idea is that Sage is with batteries included and should
not interfere with anything that you have on your system. Namely,
since Sage is rather big, it is very probable that Sage ships
something that is already installed on your computer -- in your case,
Python. So,
You might be looking for the attach command:
http://www.sagemath.org/doc/tutorial/programming.html
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 6:50 PM, Kurda Yon kurda...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi all,
is it possible to write a file with a sage program (a set of sage
command) and then execute the program?
I tried
Sage is a python module.
The following is an example which defines a class from which you can
manipulate functions :
-
#! /usr/bin/sage -python
# -*- coding: utf8 -*-
from sage.all import *
class MaClasse(object):
def
Hi Laurent,
Thank you for your answer. I am trying to understand your code (I
started to use sage just yesterday, so it can be a problem for me).
The first 2 lines looks like you want to execute the commands in as a
shell script. This assumptions is also supported by by a fact that I
have to
Another alternative: if you call your file test.sage rather than
test.py, and then do sage test.sage from the command line, it will
be run as if you had typed all the corresponding commands in a Sage
session, so you don't need the from sage.all import * line in
Laurent's example above.
David
On
On May 29, 2:41 pm, Kurda Yon kurda...@yahoo.com wrote:
But because of some reason it does not work. I create a file called
test.py. I put there just one line from sage.all import * and then
I execute this code as a Python program python test.py. Then I get
the following:
File test.py,
Great! It works. It is exactly what I needed. By the way. If I execute
test.sage, sage creates a new file called sage.py. Is there a way to
prevent that?
On May 29, 9:45 am, davidloeffler dave.loeff...@gmail.com wrote:
Another alternative: if you call your file test.sage rather than
test.py,
davidloeffler ha scritto:
Another alternative: if you call your file test.sage rather than
test.py, and then do sage test.sage from the command line, it will
be run as if you had typed all the corresponding commands in a Sage
session, so you don't need the from sage.all import * line in
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 7:03 AM, Laurent moky.m...@gmail.com wrote:
davidloeffler ha scritto:
Another alternative: if you call your file test.sage rather than
test.py, and then do sage test.sage from the command line, it will
be run as if you had typed all the corresponding commands in a
14 matches
Mail list logo
