Here is the essence of it.
sage: QQbar(e^(4/3*I*pi)*e^(2/3*I*pi).conjugate())
-0.500? + 0.866025403784439?*I
QQbar is not exactly a symbolic ring. In fact, in its documentation
we have
sage: QQbar.zeta(3)
-0.500? + 0.866025403784439?*I
I'm not quite sure how to fix
On Jun 22, 11:13 am, cjung cjun...@gmx.de wrote:
My question is now, if this is a bug or just a mistake in my code?
I suspect that you create your roots of unity using exponents that are
floats. In that case it may be a bug in Sage that it doesn't throw an
error. It may be what you are
On Jun 22, 2010, at 1:02 PM, Nils Bruin wrote:
On Jun 22, 11:13 am, cjung cjun...@gmx.de wrote:
My question is now, if this is a bug or just a mistake in my code?
I suspect that you create your roots of unity using exponents that
are floats.
If m and n are integers, m/n shouldn't be a
On Jun 22, 2:13 pm, cjung cjun...@gmx.de wrote:
Dear all,
Here's my problem: I've written a function (the scource code below),
which should compute the scalarproduct of two classfunction of a group
G. But there is a little problem with that, the values of the
classfunction are just given as a
Hello Guys,
thank you for your suggestions.
s.simplify_full()
s.simplify_rational()
s.exactify()
All these solve the problem. I choosed s.exactify, because it seems to
be faster for big groups, so thanks all
best regards
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
