[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not being a programmer, I really do need to leave the list,
and just keep in touch via the mag.
This is a worry for me: this is meant to be the sam users list and if
our discussion topics have gone so off-base that people are thinking of
leaving then we should
I dont think the discussions need to change, it is any sam related issues
are discussed here. There are often non-programming related ones.
I trust and hope people wont leave the list just because there were a few
programming question.
My views anyway - take em, leave em :)
A.
-Original
I like the fact that messages come round with all different subjects: Sim
Coupe; Vector Graphics; SAM Surveys; User Group ideas. Let's face it, the
list was quiet for so long and it is great to see such enthusiasm.
Luke
-Original Message-
From: Geoff Winkless [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Righty, it seems
to me that there are a lot more deserving owners of a SAM on this list than
myself (ie, people who'll actually use one even
if it's just cannibalised and used for surgery). So, I'm giving
mine up for adoption (even if the adopters do rip it apart and bury the rest in
the
Although i would love it, im not going to be anywhere near there for a
while. What price do you want? Would you be able to just stick it all in a
box that i can get a courier to collect?
A.
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Graham
I would love it too. I am in the
Warwickshire area and could also pick it up.
Luke
-Original
Message-
From: Graham Goring
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 17
January 2003 10:12
To: 'sam-users@nvg.ntnu.no'
Subject: Free SAM Coupé (he's
innocent)
Righty, it seems to me that
Then
you are more worthy of it - although if there is any duplicate software when you
get it, let me know :) they may fill some of my holes :D
A.
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Luke
TrevorrowSent: 17 January 2003 10:26To:
Righty, well I'll have to arrange a
time and date when I'm at my mum's ideally for you to grab it (or
maybe thereafter if my mum doesn't mind me leaving it somewhere
accessable). You're welcome to my stupidly huge collection of discs, too,
though I'm not sure that they'll still work. Just
Kool. You can e-mail me off list to
discuss. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Luke
-Original
Message-
From: Graham Goring
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 17
January 2003 10:37
To: 'sam-users@nvg.ntnu.no'
Subject: RE: Free SAM Coupé (he's
innocent)
Righty,
well I'll have to arrange a
Will do mate. That is very kind of you,
although I do feel like we have bothed jumped the gun seeing as most people
seem to e-mail in the evenings. Ho hum.
Luke
-Original
Message-
From: Adrian Brown
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 17 January 2003 10:25
To:
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003 10:51:09 - Luke Trevorrow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a great idea. It would be nice if you could bolt on different high
level languages on top of the IDE, like C that could be compiled to Z80.
This would attract more people to develop and test for the SAM.
When did they add SAM support? The last time I looked at this I am sure they
didn't support it?!
Luke
-Original Message-
From: Frode Tenneboe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 17 January 2003 11:24
To: sam-users@nvg.ntnu.no
Subject: RE: a thought (was RE: Moment of truth)
On Thu, 16 Jan
Frode wrote:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/z88dk/
C cross-compiler to Z80. SAM Support included. No IDE and no debugger,
but I guess SimCoupe could be used as a debugger?
The problem is that without an IDE, then a debugger is pretty useless.
You need something which will allow you to track
On Fri, 17 Jan 2003 12:07:17 - Geoff Winkless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frode wrote:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/z88dk/
C cross-compiler to Z80. SAM Support included. No IDE and no debugger,
but I guess SimCoupe could be used as a debugger?
The problem is that without an IDE,
On Fri, 17 Jan 2003 11:53:34 - Luke Trevorrow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When did they add SAM support? The last time I looked at this I am sure they
didn't support it?!
I added it a year ago with ansi just in (well, since sourceforge
CVS is down't I haven't been able to check that it's
Frode wrote:
You don't NEED that. I have no problems whatsoever having
source code in one window and the debugger/simulator in
another. Compiling in a third. Actually, I prefer it.
You -prefer- it? Why? It simply increases the amount of time and effort
you need to take.
I know. And tight
The problem is that without an IDE, then a debugger is pretty useless.
You need something
which will allow you to track the current position of code and refer it
back to a particular section of source, and automatically take you to
that source.
But this could be taken the route SN Systems did
But tight integration = faster development = more software.
It's an initial time investment which brings significant long-term
benefits.
Geoff
But I have to disagree here, the coding mostly takes less time than the
GFX/Presentation etc, how will intergration help you with that ?
By this I mean
On Fri, 17 Jan 2003 12:20:06 - Geoff Winkless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frode wrote:
You don't NEED that. I have no problems whatsoever having
source code in one window and the debugger/simulator in
another. Compiling in a third. Actually, I prefer it.
You -prefer- it? Why? It
Frode wrote:
This is a claim I have never seen substantiated.
What's to substantiate?
With separate systems I need to compile, upload the file somehow to the
emulator, run the emulator, run the code. I then need to set up the
debugger within the emulator to do exactly what I need (and depending
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 12:18:26AM -, Adrian Brown wrote:
Lets run a little poll. Can people fill in the following and reply
Sure.
1) Do you have an actual Sam Coupe:
Yes.
2) Does it work?
Yes, although I am worried about the disk drive.
3) Do you still use it?
A little; I really need
Hi Graham
I have been trying to get hold of a SAM for years, and refuse to pay stupid
Ebay prices..
I live in Coventry, and therefore can pick it up whenever it
is ready. I would also be willing to slip you a note for your nice generosity,
and also offer you first refusal on a batch of
Title: RE: Free SAM Coupé (he's innocent)
I'm afraid it's already spoken-for by Luke. Sorry.
-Original Message-
From: Matt Shaw [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17 January 2003 16:13
To: sam-users@nvg.ntnu.no
Subject: Re: Free SAM Coupé (he's innocent)
Hi Graham
I have been trying
Title: RE: Free SAM Coupé (he's innocent)
Matt,
do you already have a sam?
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Graham
GoringSent: 17 January 2003 16:15To:
'sam-users@nvg.ntnu.no'Subject: RE: Free SAM Coupé (he's
innocent)
I'm
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 10:11:53PM +, Nev Young wrote:
8) Would you develop a title for the sam still?
A non games title perhaps.
Would you mind expanding on this, please? I'm struggling to find tasks
that the SAM would be particularly good at doing.
--
Stuart Brady
Hi, Franz,
Both, at any rate certainly the ZX, and if I can find the darn thing the NEC. Now whilst I beleive the
ZX works OK, I've only ever had the NEC to put its red light on. I have no discs for the NEC, but
I think the manuals are around somewhere.
are you intrerested?
Stafford
- Original Message -
From: Luke Trevorrow
To: 'sam-users@nvg.ntnu.no'
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 11:10 AM
Subject: RE: Free SAM Coupé (he's innocent)
Will do mate. That is very kind of you, although I do feel like we have
bothed jumped the gun seeing as most people seem to e-mail in
27 matches
Mail list logo
