> On 07-Dec-10 13:38, Tennebø Frode wrote:
> >> Just looking at http://sdcc.sourceforge.net/ , a Small Device C
> >> Compiler. Was there a reason why it can't be used to
> compile to SAM?
> > Not really. z88dk (http://www.z88dk.org/) already has a
> working SAM mode, and sdcc and z88dk is i
On 07-Dec-10 13:38, Tennebø Frode wrote:
Just looking at http://sdcc.sourceforge.net/ , a Small Device C
Compiler. Was there a reason why it can't be used to compile to SAM?
Not really. z88dk (http://www.z88dk.org/) already has a working SAM mode, and
sdcc and z88dk is in some sort of c
>
> Just looking at http://sdcc.sourceforge.net/ , a Small Device C
> Compiler. Was there a reason why it can't be used to compile to SAM?
Not really. z88dk (http://www.z88dk.org/) already has a working SAM mode, and
sdcc and z88dk is in some sort of coop mode these days, trying to adapt
Hello everyone
Just looking at http://sdcc.sourceforge.net/ , a Small Device C
Compiler. Was there a reason why it can't be used to compile to SAM?
Hope you're all doing well! I've spent a couple of days trawling
through my 20-year-old SAM floppy collection to see what's salvageable.