On Sun, 29 Apr 2001 23:43:49 +0100, Paul Walker
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 09:13:35PM +0100, Nev Young wrote:
AFAIK Format died a death last century g
It's been over a year since I last thought of SAM stuff, from memory. :)
Bob is still alive and ripping people
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Nev Young [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aan: sam-users@nvg.ntnu.no sam-users@nvg.ntnu.no
Datum: dinsdag 1 mei 2001 8:00
Onderwerp: Re: GoodSAMC
He still terrorises alt.rec.cats and uk.legal and a few other
newsfroups.
You DO abuse your cats, you keep cats indoors all
On Tue, 1 May 2001 08:26:20 +0200, Robert van der Veeke
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Nev Young [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aan: sam-users@nvg.ntnu.no sam-users@nvg.ntnu.no
Datum: dinsdag 1 mei 2001 8:00
Onderwerp: Re: GoodSAMC
He still terrorises alt.rec.cats
On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 09:13:35PM +0100, Nev Young wrote:
AFAIK Format died a death last century g
It's been over a year since I last thought of SAM stuff, from memory. :)
Bob is still alive and ripping people off erm I mean providing a valuable
service to the PC community.
I'm strangely
On Fri, 27 Apr 2001 00:09:37 +0100, David Ledbury
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What? You mean he actually *did* have some copyrights???!!
No, I mean he actually claimed to have :-)
--
Nev - no longer at [EMAIL PROTECTED] and getting no spam at all (yet)
Webpage under construction at
On Fri, 27 Apr 2001 23:56:29 +0100, David Ledbury
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And what happened to the Sam clocks
Sh. But just between me and you, they didn't work.
You had to set the time every time you turned the SAM on cos the
battery couldn't do the job.
--
Nev - no longer at
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 08:02:07AM +0200, Robert van der Veeke wrote:
No he only had the rights to distribute them, that is something completely
different from holding the copyright. But Bob being Bob tried to explain in
such a way that it looks like he rights where just as important as those
- Original Message -
From: Paul Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: sam-users@nvg.ntnu.no
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 11:31 PM
Subject: Re: GoodSAMC
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 08:02:07AM +0200, Robert van der Veeke wrote:
No he only had the rights to distribute them, that is something
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 11:56:29PM +0100, David Ledbury wrote:
And what happened to the Sam clocks
Good grief, I'd forgotten all about those. People still haven't received
them?
--
Paul
Some of us don't have cable. Me, for instance. I don't have it because I'm
afraid that if I did, I'd
- Original Message -
From: Paul Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: sam-users@nvg.ntnu.no
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 11:58 PM
Subject: Re: GoodSAMC
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 11:56:29PM +0100, David Ledbury wrote:
And what happened to the Sam clocks
Good grief, I'd forgotten all about
On Wed, 25 Apr 2001 14:44:21 +0100, Luke Trevorrow
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a dark and distant memory of Andy posting on the list that the SAM
ROMs are PD. This was so that they could be distributed with SimCoupe.
Luke
I have an archive that says
What? You mean he actually *did* have some copyrights???!!
- Original Message -
From: Nev Young [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: sam-users@nvg.ntnu.no
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 11:04 PM
Subject: Re: GoodSAMC
On Wed, 25 Apr 2001 14:44:21 +0100, Luke Trevorrow
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: David Ledbury [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aan: sam-users@nvg.ntnu.no sam-users@nvg.ntnu.no
Datum: vrijdag 27 april 2001 1:08
Onderwerp: Re: GoodSAMC
What? You mean he actually *did* have some copyrights???!!
No he only had the rights to distribute them
Hi Simon (and all),
I have the mail from Andy Wright giving permission to distribute the Sam
Rom binary in SimCoupe field away on my PC at home. I will dig it out
and post it to the list.
BTW Simon, SimCoupe and SDL is a great idea. I'm sure someone here can
port the Windows UI to UNIX, either
But I doubt he would have made the PD - only that he'd allow Allan to
distribute them with the emulator - if i recall.
- Original Message -
From: Allan Skillman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: sam-users@nvg.ntnu.no
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 8:33 AM
Subject: Re: GoodSAMC
Hi Simon (and all
Aley Keprt wrote:
I had to unpack all my images, since it stupidly doesn't
accept sad.gz / SADv2 images.
Yeah, seems odd that the program uses ZLib, but only for zip files - it
didn't seem to like my .gz files either.
Also, it seemms that it refuses to accept SAD converted to DSK or
vice
-Original Message-
From: Simon Owen [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 25 April 2001 12:25
To: sam-users@nvg.ntnu.no
Subject: Re: GoodSAMC
Aley Keprt wrote:
I had to unpack all my images, since it stupidly doesn't
accept sad.gz / SADv2 images.
Yeah, seems odd
And, finally, it refuses to accept disks with more than 80 tracks
(maybe all except 80, but I have only 80, 82 and 84).
Must be a non-80-track thing, as it also complained about undersize SAD
images - your 'alternative module player' comes on a small SAD image,
and that had to be converted
the existance of the crap in the db, and only
renaming good stuff
- i guess its just easier that way
-Original Message-
From: Aley Keprt [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 25 April 2001 13:55
To: sam-users@nvg.ntnu.no
Subject: Re: GoodSAMC
And, finally, it refuses to accept disks
-users@nvg.ntnu.no'
Subject: RE: GoodSAMC
they'll get to that,
trouble is, they have to filter out the dross first,
if you look at the other good utils, any confirmed good dumps are marked !
thats what will probably happen to goodsamc,
i dont know why the author allows crap to be listed
You never know what is official. It contains tens of spectrum games
collection or demos collection images. That's why I wrote it is a
nonsense to make database of diskettes. I think we should build a
database of ROMs instead. (real roms - MGT Sam Basic version
1,2,3..., SamCo ROM, etc.)
Who
werent they released as PD?
-Original Message-
From: Matthew J Craven [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 25 April 2001 14:26
To: sam-users@nvg.ntnu.no
Subject: RE: GoodSAMC
You never know what is official. It contains tens of spectrum games
collection or demos collection
Dr A Wright (author) / SamCo Recievers / Format
Not sure about PD , infact i haven't seen them anywhere
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Dean Woodyatt
Sent: 25 April 2001 14:32
To: 'sam-users@nvg.ntnu.no'
Subject: RE: GoodSAMC
werent
Aley Keprt wrote:
Really?
It's called Aley's instead of Alternative. I don't know
who the f. wrote the worng name into the database.
Heh - they should have known that there are no other 'A' words! ;-)
And I don't know why it has undersized SAD. Isn't the file
corrupted?
My mistake - the
Subject:RE: GoodSAMC
You never know what is official. It contains tens of spectrum
games collection or demos collection images. That's why I wrote
it is a nonsense to make database of diskettes. I think we should
build a database of ROMs instead. (real roms - MGT Sam Basic
version
Subject: RE: GoodSAMC
werent they released as PD?
No idea! I *thought* that was just Amstrad (even though they retain
copyright). Did Samco, MGT actually do that?
-Original Message-
From: Matthew J Craven [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 25 April 2001 14:26
To: sam-users
I have a dark and distant memory of Andy posting on the list that the
SAM ROMs are PD. This was so that they could be distributed with
SimCoupe.
Luke
Yes. It would be logical. That's good news then!
--Matthew.
Luke Trevorrow wrote:
I have a dark and distant memory of Andy posting on the list
that the SAM ROMs are PD. This was so that they could be
distributed with SimCoupe.
*forms a circle and joins hands*
Allan? Can you hear us out there?
Si
Really?
It's called Aley's instead of Alternative. I don't know
who the f. wrote the worng name into the database.
Heh - they should have known that there are no other 'A' words! ;-)
!!! [EMAIL PROTECTED]@%
They are other words too. I know at least one: Axoft ;-)
I don't know what's wrong
aley, make up a list of the ones your name should be in
I've spoken with cowering before,
i'll make sure it gets done!
-Original Message-
From: Aley Keprt [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 25 April 2001 15:23
To: sam-users@nvg.ntnu.no
Subject: Re: GoodSAMC
Really?
It's
Aley Keprt wrote:
I don't know what's wrong on having my name at the beginning
of some programs, jsut to distinguish them from other
software. Other people or companies do it as well. e.g. Corel
Draw, Microsoft Windows, Adobe Acrobat, Norton Commander, etc.
It stands out to me because it's
]
Sent: 25 April 2001 15:33
To: sam-users@nvg.ntnu.no
Subject: RE: GoodSAMC
Aley Keprt wrote:
I don't know what's wrong on having my name at the beginning
of some programs, jsut to distinguish them from other
software. Other people or companies do it as well. e.g. Corel
Draw
Dean Woodyatt wrote:
I think, that given the enthusiast nature of the sam coupe
that people should be given full credit by name in the Db
this wouldnt work for the NES, or Megadrive, but seeming as
most stuff for sam was PD, this would be best!
Yep, agreed (I was only talking about the
@nvg.ntnu.no
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 4:32 PM
Subject: RE: GoodSAMC
Aley Keprt wrote:
I don't know what's wrong on having my name at the beginning
of some programs, jsut to distinguish them from other
software. Other people or companies do it as well. e.g. Corel
Draw, Microsoft Windows, Adobe
I think, that given the enthusiast nature of the sam coupe
that people should be given full credit by name in the Db
this wouldnt work for the NES, or Megadrive, but seeming as
most stuff for sam was PD, this would be best!
Yep, agreed (I was only talking about the program names before).
SiCoupe?
Mmm. ;¬)
-Original Message-
From: Aley Keprt [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 25 April 2001 16:04
To: sam-users@nvg.ntnu.no
Subject: Aley [Was: Re: GoodSAMC]
You should know that Aley is not my real name, it's my nick and I use it
instead of Axoft
At 17:05 25/04/01 +0200, Aley Keprt wrote:
I see I won't release my programs for Sam, otherwise you will put me in the
lowest coders quality cathegory.
Interesting assertion - that PD programs are the lowest quality. Presumably
you also rank people who write software for money as the best
I see I won't release my programs for Sam, otherwise you will put me in
the
lowest coders quality cathegory.
Interesting assertion - that PD programs are the lowest quality.
Presumably
you also rank people who write software for money as the best coders?
Usually people who really can earn
Usually people who really can earn money from *it*, don't do *it* for
free. ;-) Actually, I know my software for Sam, and I know what
cathegory they are. :-( If somebody is going to cathegorize authors by
quality, I will fall into the lowest one, if I upload anything more
than 10% of my
At 18:50 25/04/01 +0200, Aley wrote:
Usually people who really can earn money from *it*, don't do *it* for free.
;-)
I'd be interested to hear what you think of, say, free software, then. (In
the GNU sense.) Or people who both write software for money, and for free...
--
Paul
Usually people who really can earn money from *it*, don't do *it* for
free.
;-)
I'd be interested to hear what you think of, say, free software, then. (In
the GNU sense.) Or people who both write software for money, and for
free...
off topic
At 19:51 25/04/01 +0200, you wrote:
I'd be interested to hear what you think of, say, free software, then. (In
the GNU sense.) Or people who both write software for money, and for
free...
off topic
Private email?
--
Paul
On Tue, 24 Apr 2001 20:12:57 +0100 Chris White [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's complete and being uploaded to Nvg , When the SysOp sorts it into its
own dir anyone who wishes to may grab it from there
I have moved it into temp/from_CW. I have no idea what to do with it.
Should I create a separate
C
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Frode Tenneboe
Sent: 24 April 2001 20:32
To: sam-users@nvg.ntnu.no
Subject: Re: GoodSamC (Was Help Me:) )
On Tue, 24 Apr 2001 20:12:57 +0100 Chris White
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's complete and being
What is your private email :)
45 matches
Mail list logo
