[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just a remark - if my last post came to you broken (like only 3 sentences), then ignore it, please. I wrote quite a long one, but it was cutted down and I don't know the reason.Sorry for inconvienence!ellvisYeah, it was only three lines... it seems to say enough though
I can categorically say that it didnt work
-Original Message-
From: Frans van Egmond [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 7:35 PM
To: sam-users@nvg.ntnu.no
Subject: Re: test
David Ledbury wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Frans v. Egmond
Quoting Aley Keprt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
test
I hear you !!!
- Original Message -
From: Frans v. Egmond [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: sam-users@nvg.ntnu.no
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 10:44 PM
Subject: Re: test
Quoting Aley Keprt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
test
I hear you !!!
I hear me as well.
David Ledbury wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Frans v. Egmond [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: sam-users@nvg.ntnu.no
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 10:44 PM
Subject: Re: test
Quoting Aley Keprt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
test
I hear you !!!
I hear me as well.
Then I think its safe
On Tue, May 08, 2001 at 10:51:32PM +0100, David Ledbury wrote:
I hear me as well.
Ah, but can you still hear the Voices?
--
Paul
The good thing about standards is that there are so many to choose from.
-- Andrew S. Tanenbaum
123
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Aley Keprt
Sent: 08 May 2001 14:19
To: Sam Users
Subject: test
test
On Fri, 8 Jan 1999, Chris Pile wrote:
This is a test to see if I've entered the SAM group address in my address
book correctly...
Looks like it.
(someone had too!)
@/
.@/
Unc - Tim Paveley - Moderator of The
On 19 Oct 1998, Lee Willis wrote:
Can't remember. Still seems to work, though.
Erm I thought you said it didn't ...
Did for the other lists, for some strange reason.
On Mon, 19 Oct 1998, Ian Collier wrote:
I thought you started this thread precisely because it doesn't work...
Leave me alone, it was a case of fingers before brain... :/
Paul Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, 19 Oct 1998, Ian Collier wrote:
I thought you started this thread precisely because it doesn't work...
Leave me alone, it was a case of fingers before brain... :/
Ooh my speciality ...
--
I was doing object-oriented assembly at 1 year old
Paul Walker wrote:
'scuse me, just one quick test.
And here's another
On Sun, 18 Oct 1998, David wrote:
'scuse me, just one quick test.
And here's another
Didn't work, unfortunately. :/ Every other list I'm on gets filtered into
the right place by procmail, except sam-users. God knows why.
Paul Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, 18 Oct 1998, David wrote:
Didn't work, unfortunately. :/ Every other list I'm on gets filtered into
the right place by procmail, except sam-users. God knows why.
Well OK, I realise that this is just asking for another mousse type
debate but
On 19 Oct 1998, Lee Willis wrote:
Well OK, I realise that this is just asking for another mousse type
debate but what's your recipe ?
Apologies for non-unix people...
===
MAILDIR=$HOME/Mail
LOGFILE=$MAILDIR/procmail.log
VERBOSE=on
LOGABSTRACT=all
# Back it all up (doesn't work?!)
:O c
backup
On Mon, 19 Oct 1998 12:15:30 +0100 (BST), Paul Walker said:
# Back it all up (doesn't work?!)
:O c
backup
# Mailing list section
# this doesn't work either :/
:O:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sam-users
[snip]
OK, first question... why are you writing :O instead of :0?
The subsidiary
Ian Collier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
OnMon, 19 Oct 1998 12:15:30 +0100 (BST), Paul Walker said:
# Back it all up (doesn't work?!)
:O c
backup
# Mailing list section
# this doesn't work either :/
:O:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sam-users
[snip]
OK, first question... why are
On Mon, 19 Oct 1998, Ian Collier wrote:
OK, first question... why are you writing :O instead of :0?
Can't remember. Still seems to work, though.
The subsidiary question is what character you expect to be matched by
the dot, except for a space.
Just a space.
On 19 Oct 1998, Lee Willis wrote:
OK, first question... why are you writing :O instead of :0?
Yep, problem numero uno ...
I was confused by the fact that all the other lists filtered okay, and
they had a :O there as well. Changed it now and it's working, so.. :)
I'd guess that he just
Paul Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, 19 Oct 1998, Ian Collier wrote:
OK, first question... why are you writing :O instead of :0?
Can't remember. Still seems to work, though.
Erm I thought you said it didn't ...
Lee.
--
I was doing object-oriented assembly at 1 year old ...
On Mon, 19 Oct 1998 14:44:12 +0100 (BST), Paul Walker said:
On Mon, 19 Oct 1998, Ian Collier wrote:
OK, first question... why are you writing :O instead of :0?
Can't remember. Still seems to work, though.
I thought you started this thread precisely because it doesn't work...
imc
On 19 Oct 1998 14:47:57 +0100, Lee Willis said:
I'd guess that he just expects one space to be there, I'd recommend
something along the lines of
^From.*owner-sam-users
which should cover it pretty well
But there's only one From line which ever contains owner-sam-users and
that's the
22 matches
Mail list logo
