Andrew Collier wrote:
> Unfortunately, the GPL does not clearly define its use of the term
> "distribution". I would say that if Simon does not make the binary
> generally available, then there is no requirement to make the source
> generally available.
>
> Like I said, give him time. I'm sure tha
On Mon, 7 Jun 1999, Aley Keprt wrote:
> Since Si Owen doesn't want to release his sources (I hate him for this),
Probably just for the same reason I haven't yet released Hurricane source
- it's not ready.
> In addition I'd like to ask this: Why Linux users don't make their version
> first and
>
On Mon, 7 Jun 1999, Simon Cooke wrote:
> > Hey, Sim Coupe was distributed under the GPL license. If Si doesn't
> > want to surrender the modified source then he is breaking the law, and
> > many people within the GPL sphere are perfectly happy to help fight if
> > this is the case.
> >
>
> Intere
Well - it's getting toward the end of my third year at Selwyn College,
Cambridge; that means carou.sel.cam.ac.uk will shortly be going offline,
permanently.
Fortunately, I've been able to organise a new home for my Sam-related
content, so why not browse to the following URL:
http://mnemotech.ucam
>> Point 1: Oh no he hasn't.
>>
>> He has modified GPL source to produce the development version of SimCoupe
>> Win32. But since he is not distributing a binary of SimCoupe Win32, he is
>> under *no* obligation to release his modifications to the source.
>
> Actually I am told there is a bina
