RE: SAM 2000?

2000-10-23 Thread Justin . Skists
interesting idea... I remember mentioning something like this (though, in a lot less detail) back in the old days when we were talking about something called the SamSon... Unfortunately, I don't think anyone is going to stamp up the money for the actual computer design. But PC bits and bobs will

Re: SAM 2000?

2000-10-23 Thread Aley Keprt
interesting idea... I remember mentioning something like this (though, in a lot less detail) back in the old days when we were talking about something called the SamSon... Unfortunately, I don't think anyone is going to stamp up the money for the actual computer design. But PC bits and

Re: SAM 2000?

2000-10-23 Thread Aley Keprt
Hello some users (ocassionally Sam users), I've put out of temper, as I read the mail below. Please don't read the rest, when you don't like my rude mails. Whis might be too much for you... Although somebody may want to kick me out Sam-users, after reading this mail, I had to write it, since it

RE: SAM 2000?

2000-10-23 Thread Justin . Skists
OK, Aley. bulky stuff is probably an exaggeration. I was talking about streamlining the distribution for efficiency, taking out stuff that probably won't be needed for the proposed SAM2000 OS. Otherwise, we might aswell just have the emulator running on Linux and be done with it... -Original

Re: SAM 2000?

2000-10-23 Thread Aley Keprt
OK, Aley. bulky stuff is probably an exaggeration. I was talking about streamlining the distribution for efficiency, taking out stuff that probably won't be needed for the proposed SAM2000 OS. Otherwise, we might aswell just have the emulator running on Linux and be done with it... Winux or

RE: SAM 2000?

2000-10-23 Thread Howard Price
I'm afraid I side with Aley. I wouldn't say it's impossible, or even that hard, if you know what you're doing, but there are loads of drawbacks. People who want to use the SAM in its own box don't need Ethernet etc etc. They want a cheap copy of the SAM, no Rage, no 600MHz (what would the point

RE: FRED Web Pages

2000-10-23 Thread dan
Slow day in the office :) Fred Web pages updated with contents info up to issue 69 and screenshots up to issue 50. Dan.

Re: SAM 2000?

2000-10-23 Thread Aley Keprt
I'm afraid I side with Aley. I wouldn't say it's impossible, or even that hard, if you know what you're doing, but there are loads of drawbacks. People who want to use the SAM in its own box don't need Ethernet etc etc. They want a cheap copy of the SAM, no Rage, no 600MHz (what would the

RE: SAM 2000?

2000-10-23 Thread Justin . Skists
I do understand DirectX... I don't see it as additional weight in general use... What I am saying is this: If we were to make an operating system with the look and feel of the SAM Coupe, DirectX would probably not be needed IF AND ONLY IF we were to replace it with a scheme to access the

RE: SAM 2000?

2000-10-23 Thread Justin . Skists
I was thinking out loud about a modern PC-based operating system with the look and feel of the SAM - with it designed to accomodate the SAM emulator as efficiently as possible. -Original Message- From: Howard Price [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 23, 2000 2:27 PM To:

Re: Progress

2000-10-23 Thread Howard Price
Downgrading for the SAM is complicated, because it has 7-bit colour. 2 bits for each of RGB, and the Spectrum handed down its 'half-brightness' bit. I knew there was a reason I shouldnt go down this road! [rr][gg][bb][x] is the layout? Actually it works as [0][R][G][B][h][r][g][b]. As you

Re: SAM 2000?

2000-10-23 Thread Stuart Brady
On Mon, 23 Oct 2000, Aley Keprt wrote: I've put out of temper, as I read the mail below. In my opinion, the sad thing is that you actually care about this, Aley. Dave posts a few bad ideas to sam-users - big deal, eh? I just deleted it. [snip] Then we can use SimCoupe. Since SimCoupe is

Re: SAM 2000?

2000-10-23 Thread Aley Keprt
Then we can use SimCoupe. Since SimCoupe is portable and free (source), it is available on any op.system. (At least op.systems which are used by some programmers, who can make the port.) IIRC, SimCoupe has forked into ports for Windows, DOS, Mac, and UNIX. This is turning into a major

RE: SAM 2000?

2000-10-23 Thread Justin . Skists
Because one port isn't being kept up with the others... -Original Message- From: Aley Keprt [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 23, 2000 5:08 PM To: sam-users@nvg.ntnu.no Subject: Re: SAM 2000? Then we can use SimCoupe. Since SimCoupe is portable and free

Re: SAM 2000?

2000-10-23 Thread Aley Keprt
Because one port isn't being kept up with the others... -Original Message- From: Aley Keprt [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 23, 2000 5:08 PM To: sam-users@nvg.ntnu.no Subject: Re: SAM 2000? Then we can use SimCoupe. Since SimCoupe is portable and free

RE: SAM 2000?

2000-10-23 Thread Stuart Brady
On Mon, 23 Oct 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Because one port isn't being kept up with the others... Exactly. Source code is useful for this, too, BTW. Also, there's no need to keep the development for each platform seperate: Mozilla is a full blown web browser that compiles for Windows, OS/2,

Re: SAM 2000?

2000-10-23 Thread Aley Keprt
On Mon, 23 Oct 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Because one port isn't being kept up with the others... Exactly. Source code is useful for this, too, BTW. Also, there's no need to keep the development for each platform seperate: Mozilla is a full blown web browser that compiles for Windows,

Re: SAM 2000?

2000-10-23 Thread Andrew Collier
Hello some users (ocassionally Sam users), I've put out of temper, as I read the mail below. Please don't read the rest, when you don't like my rude mails. Aley, why do you keep doing this sort of thing? I mean, I actually do agree with most of the points you raised but why on earth do you feel

Re: SAM 2000?

2000-10-23 Thread Aley Keprt
Hello some users (ocassionally Sam users), I've put out of temper, as I read the mail below. Please don't read the rest, when you don't like my rude mails. Aley, why do you keep doing this sort of thing? I mean, I actually do agree with most of the points you raised but why on earth do

Re: SAM 2000?

2000-10-23 Thread David L
- Original Message - From: Andrew Collier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: sam-users@nvg.ntnu.no Sent: Monday, October 23, 2000 7:58 PM Subject: Re: SAM 2000? Hello some users (ocassionally Sam users), I've put out of temper, as I read the mail below. Please don't read the rest, when you