Re: Sam -year 2000-The Secretary

1999-07-08 Thread Dave Whitmore
On Tue, 6 Jul 1999 20:51:23 +0100 Wed, 7 Jul 99 20:02:34 BST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | I think it is MasterDOS that needs a patch. | | Waste of time anyway. Who the hell would want to use that crap in this | day and age? Are we talking MasterDos or Secretary? The Secretary. Do you think

Re: Sam -year 2000-The Secretary

1999-07-06 Thread Dave Whitmore
On Sat, 3 Jul 1999 16:30:22 +0100 Sat, 3 Jul 99 17:04:50 BST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | Has anyone got a fix for the Secretary wordprocessor to make understand the | year 2000 I think it is MasterDOS that needs a patch. Waste of time anyway. Who the hell would want to use that crap in

Re: Sam -year 2000-The Secretary

1999-07-06 Thread Samsboss
| On Sat, 3 Jul 1999 16:30:22 +0100 Sat, 3 Jul 99 17:04:50 BST, | [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | | | | | | Has anyone got a fix for the Secretary wordprocessor to make understand the | | year 2000 | | | I think it is MasterDOS that needs a patch. | | Waste of time anyway. Who the hell would

Re: Sam -year 2000-The Secretary

1999-07-03 Thread Samsboss
| Has anyone got a fix for the Secretary wordprocessor to make understand the | year 2000 I think it is MasterDOS that needs a patch. -- Samsboss - The One And Only. Accept No Others.