Re: your mail

2000-01-07 Thread Ian Collier
On Thu, Jan 06, 2000 at 07:33:14PM -, David L wrote: A Z380 or Z280 machine would, I would imagine, be remotely of interest to some people on the list. Quite possibly. However, you neglected to mention that this was what your post was about, and didn't give proper directions to it. imc

Re: your mail

2000-01-07 Thread David L
- Original Message - From: Ian Collier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: sam-users@nvg.ntnu.no Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2000 11:02 PM Subject: Re: your mail On Thu, Jan 06, 2000 at 07:33:14PM -, David L wrote: A Z380 or Z280 machine would, I would imagine, be remotely of interest

Re: your mail

2000-01-07 Thread Simon Cooke
To be honest... I couldn't find it either... I followed your directions, and couldn't understand anything that was there (it was all in Russian). I nosied around, couldn't find anything in English, looked at the pretty picture, and moved on. Remind me to copy a roadmap next time ;) Anyone with

RE: your mail

2000-01-07 Thread Si Owen
Simon Cooke wrote: To be honest... I couldn't find it either... I followed your directions, and couldn't understand anything that was there (it was all in Russian). I nosied around, couldn't find anything in English, Clicking on the British flag seems to make it worse! If you click straight

Re: your mail

2000-01-06 Thread Ian Collier
On Mon, Jan 03, 2000 at 09:05:09PM -, David L wrote: Anyone still actually interested in their Sam - try this site... click on the Union Flag tho ;) http://virtuals.atlant.ru/peters/e-index.htm Normally I ignore people who just post URLs without saying why I should go to them. You could

Re: your mail

2000-01-06 Thread David L
Dont be pedantic A Z380 or Z280 machine would, I would imagine, be remotely of interest to some people on the list. Obviously not. Oh well. - Original Message - From: Ian Collier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: sam-users@nvg.ntnu.no Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2000 4:11 PM Subject: Re: your mail

Re: your mail

2000-01-06 Thread Martin Fitzpatrick
David L wrote: Dont be pedantic A Z380 or Z280 machine would, I would imagine, be remotely of interest to some people on the list. I thought the point you were making was about its method of emulating a speccy right?.. About having a card in the pc's isa?.. If thats not what it said,

Re: your mail

2000-01-06 Thread Gavin Smith
David L wrote: Dont be pedantic A Z380 or Z280 machine would, I would imagine, be remotely of interest to some people on the list. Obviously not. Oh well. Don't worry David, it was interesting, thank you for pointing the URL out to us. Some people just like to complain about things

Re: your mail

2000-01-06 Thread Gordon Wallis
Martin Fitzpatrick wrote: David L wrote: Dont be pedantic A Z380 or Z280 machine would, I would imagine, be remotely of interest to some people on the list. [snip] well, it interested me... perhaps people here should eat more winegums? ;) Well, I second _that_! -- The

Re: your mail

2000-01-06 Thread Martin Fitzpatrick
Gordon Wallis wrote: Martin Fitzpatrick wrote: David L wrote: Dont be pedantic A Z380 or Z280 machine would, I would imagine, be remotely of interest to some people on the list. [snip] well, it interested me... perhaps people here should eat more winegums? ;)

Re: your mail

1999-08-30 Thread Ian Collier
On Mon, Aug 30, 1999 at 09:02:58AM +0100, Me wrote: test Er, yes. Thank you for that fascinating insight... imc

Re: your mail

1999-07-10 Thread Diggory Gray
Hi di ho Andrew Gale wrote: internet, but teleporting is still not possible (and will NOT, never ever). Are you sure about that? Thought I heard some stuff recently about quantum entangled teleportation using photons... Straying off the subject? :-) Diggory

Re: your mail

1999-07-10 Thread Jonathan Bristow
hmmm I also heard that some scientists have managed to teleport a single Atom. Respect Another Stranger -Original Message- From: Diggory Gray [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: sam-users@nvg.ntnu.no sam-users@nvg.ntnu.no Date: 10 July 1999 01:32 Subject: Re: your mail Hi di ho Andrew Gale wrote

Re: your mail

1999-07-10 Thread Stuart Brady
Jonathan Bristow wrote: hmmm I also heard that some scientists have managed to teleport a single Atom. How far? And how many floppies have the teleported? -- Stuart Brady

Re: your mail

1999-07-08 Thread Aley Keprt
On Wed, 30 Jun 1999, Rob Smith wrote: Hello Sam Users, I recently rediscovered my Spectrum and Sam and have since been transferring Specy games to Sam disc via a Messenger. I have to get rid of quite a few specy game as I have little space to keep them all (although I am keeping a

Re: your mail

1999-07-08 Thread Robert van der Veeke
Van: Aley Keprt [EMAIL PROTECTED] Aan: sam-users@nvg.ntnu.no Onderwerp: Re: your mail Datum: donderdag, juli 08, 1999 2:00 2, Does anyone want any Spectrum games? (there are about one hundred)Although I can't afford to post the games so they would have to be collected. ftp.nvg

Re: your mail

1999-07-08 Thread Andrew Gale
internet, but teleporting is still not possible (and will NOT, never ever). Are you sure about that?

RE: your mail

1999-02-28 Thread Si Owen
Graham Goring wrote: Ugh! N! I think quotes should always follow the part of the message that they are replying too. Makes more sense, especially when replying to several different sections in a message, like: Are we saying the same thing? I prefer the text for the reply to be below what

Re: your mail

1999-02-28 Thread Graham Goring
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Si Owen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes Graham Goring wrote: Ugh! N! I think quotes should always follow the part of the message that they are replying too. Makes more sense, especially when replying to several different sections in a message, like: Are we saying the

Re: your mail

1999-02-27 Thread Graham Goring
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Si Owen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes Lee Willis wrote: And if it is necessary the quote should be at the top. I think most people prefer it that way, it's more intuitive as you have a context to read the reply in! Ugh! N! I think quotes should always follow the

Re: your mail

1999-02-26 Thread Dave Hooper
... i must've missed something ... in-joke, right? dave On Fri, 26 Feb 1999, Martin Krammer wrote: help

Re: your mail

1999-02-26 Thread Ian Collier
On Fri, Feb 26, 1999 at 01:49:26PM +, Dave Hooper wrote: ... i must've missed something ... in-joke, right? On Fri, 26 Feb 1999, Martin Krammer wrote: help No, it just means Frode hasn't got administrivia turned on in the list config. :-) (Why is your quoting upside down?) imc

Re: your mail

1999-02-26 Thread Dave Hooper
On Fri, 26 Feb 1999, Ian Collier wrote: (Why is your quoting upside down?) quoting? upside down? how'd'you mean, guv? i'm using pine, it's not clever, i just reply to the message and put my own additions absolutely wherever i like. is it more preferable to have the additions below the

Re: your mail

1999-02-26 Thread Ian Collier
On Fri, Feb 26, 1999 at 02:20:19PM +, Dave Hooper wrote: is it more preferable to have the additions below the quote? Yes. HTH. imc

Re: your mail

1999-02-26 Thread Dave Hooper
Fair enough On Fri, 26 Feb 1999, Ian Collier wrote: Yes. HTH. imc

Re: your mail

1999-02-26 Thread Ian Collier
On Fri, Feb 26, 1999 at 02:40:52PM +, Dave Hooper wrote: Fair enough On Fri, 26 Feb 1999, Ian Collier wrote: Yes. HTH. imc Pred. imc

Re: your mail

1999-02-26 Thread Lee Willis
Dave Hooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: is it more preferable to have the additions below the quote? i only ever do that when it's necessary to follow the sense of the thread. i often just type above the quote because i think it's better (and sometimes it isn't - like now) If it's not

RE: your mail

1999-02-26 Thread Si Owen
Lee Willis wrote: And if it is necessary the quote should be at the top. I think most people prefer it that way, it's more intuitive as you have a context to read the reply in! There's one guy at our company that still puts his comments BELOW blocks of code, which is most irritating to read!!

Re: your mail

1999-02-18 Thread Ian Collier
On Thu, Feb 18, 1999 at 12:01:24PM -, Chris White wrote: unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] No. You can't. We refuse to let you go. imc