My problem is that whenever I try to copy a large file from a client machine to a
fat32 partition (ext3 works fine) mounted under samba, the host linux machine will
lock up completely. I can, however, copy small files to the fat32 partition just fine
(ie. 1 KB to 1 MB size file), it's only
On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 04:14:37AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My problem is that whenever I try to copy a large file from a client machine to a
fat32 partition (ext3 works fine) mounted under samba, the host linux machine will
lock up completely. I can, however, copy small files to the
You do not mention the size of your network. Here I have 12 WinNT
Workstations, 51 Win2K workstations, 3 RH Workstations and 3 RH Servers and
instead of using samba to do that job I use BIND (DNS Server) and DHCP Server
to do the work for me.
I want to be able to resolve windows machine
René Nieuwenhuizen heeft geschreven:
BTW. I've attached the output of nmblookup -S CPB and it seems like
saying that CPB is the logonserver.
I screwed the nmblookup up...again
René Nieuwenhuizen
CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis
--
im having a problem... i cant seem to be able to
clear the archive bit from any on the windows pcs on the network.
When ever i try i get a message box say it is
unable to. All users on the network are part of the same group and the files
they work on our in that group. So how come they cant
Well I'm a bit embarassed. The problem turned out to an old version of
samba running on the server. It's running samba 1.9.18p8.
I'm not a system admin on the main server here. But I tried connecting to
another box running samba 2.2.3a, and found I could type into the
username box just using a
Hi,
How can I send any messages to client windows that logon to Samba PDC?
Thank you.Get a bigger mailbox -- choose a size that fits your needs.
Hi,
We've got a fairly simple samba setup (no ldap/winbind etc) and until
recently everything worked fine (using samba-2.2.5). But after switching
to samba-2.2.6 w2k-clients fail to run the netlogon-scripts. When i look
at the client it says: logonserver=\\workstationname
BTW. The output of
My server's /var/log/syslog file is filled with:
Oct 18 13:07:38 bangkok nmbd[13656]:
Unable to find the Domain Master Browser
name BANGKOK1b for the workgroup BANGKOK.
The network is a bunch of Windows 98 workstations and a Linux server. We have Samba
set to be the WINS server,
René Nieuwenhuizen heeft geschreven:
Hi,
We've got a fairly simple samba setup (no ldap/winbind etc) and until
recently everything worked fine (using samba-2.2.5). But after switching
to samba-2.2.6 w2k-clients fail to run the netlogon-scripts. When i look
at the client it says:
Hi, I am using Cups with HP 2 x LJ2100, LJ4+, DesignJet 600 and 750C+.
Client are Win2k,Win98 and 95. Been bomb proof so far. Touch wood :-
Was easy to set up and is easy to manage.
Mark
On Fri, 2002-10-18 at 06:47, Anders Hagstrom wrote:
I've installed Red Hat 7.3 (2.4.18-3) with Samba 2.2.3a
Hi,
first of all Thanks for any help.
I would like to share with SAMBA a Unix path to Windows clients.
The problem i have is this:
I want that this share would be READONLY for someone (or somewhat TCP/IP address) and
READABLE/WRITABLE for someone else (even if throught a user/passwd
Please help is there any way using samba to map a NT share onto a UNIX
(sun Solaris box) i can do it the other way mapping a unix share to an NT
box
any ideas
a very frustrated
Paul Hewitson
CONFIDENTIALITY : This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and
may be privileged. If you
Makes perfect sense. I should have looked at a trace, thanks guys!
~ Daniel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It does work, but when I enter a wrong password I get this error inlog.winbindd:Plain-text authentication for user jarboed returned NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORDIs
Hi
Just got this quote from the Samba-BDC-HOWTO,
Note that in the latest Samba 2.2.x releases, the machine SID (and
therefore domain SID) is stored in the private/secrets.tdb database
Therefore you might have had a new secrets.tdb generated depending on how
you upgraded. Which probably means you
Original Message -
From: Carlo Corridore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 10:56 AM
Subject: [Samba] Readonly AND Writable share
Hi,
first of all Thanks for any help.
snip
why not just use
read only = yes
write list = allowed_user1,
Chaz wrote:
Hi Andrew
I am also experiencing these problems with 2.2.5, and would like to find a
solution asap!
Chris
Andrew Gaffney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:3DAC9621.9060405;locutus2.yi.org...
I set up Samba 2.2.6rc3 (also tried 2.2.4 and 2.2.5 with same effect) as
every time a cron job runs I get this in my log.winbindd
[2002/10/17 13:45:00, 1] nsswitch/winbindd_group.c:winbindd_getgroups(815)
user 'root' does not exist
the three important lines in my /etc/nsswitch.conf is:
passwd: files winbind nisplus
shadow: files nisplus
group: files
Dear SAmba
Sorry to trouble you again but here is my problem.
I want to have a directory writeable only for users in a unix group
accounts
so i need to do two things.
1. Create the group and user in linux
2. Create the relevant masks for the samba share for this directory
so i do this:
1 #
Hi,
we still have some trouble running a MS Access-database on Samba. We now
tried it with v.2.2.6 on RH 7.3 but still we either get no acces on the
database simultanously or we run in problems with updating the database.
The problem is that we make some changes on one of the clients but the
Not sure if this has anything to do with Samba:
I try and stay away from Access but a few years ago we had similar problems
with Access on a Novell server. It kept corrupting and looking at the
Access documentation it seems that Access is not a multiuser database unless
you program it to be. So
Dear Friends,
I am working in the LAN having Windows 98 and RHL 8.0 as the Clients.
From the Linux client when I tried to access the windows shared folders
through :
smb://winpc/
It immediatly shows the list of shared folders, but when I try to go
into any folder, browser became mum
Try mounting the windows PC onto a directory for example /mnt/winpc
using smbmount.
If you do this, then you will actually see any error messages if they
occur, and if it mounts ok, then it could be a problem with the way the
browser is doing network stuff. If you do get an error, you can work
-[ on 10/18/02 01:55:53 PM +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
]-
Has anyone ever get an Access-db running on more than 2 clients
simultaneously and if yes, could you please give us some helpfull hints ?
I have 2 Samba servers. One on a RedHat 6.2 (kernel 2.2x) and one on a
RedHat7.2
Hi,
I need to migrate a Windows 2000 Server PDC to a Linux/Samba, and I readed
a lot searching for an answer.
My problem is with Roaming Profiles. The user can log on but the
configuration isn't the correctly one. The wallpaper, the mail storge, the
shortcuts, etc. are wrong.
May be is the
On Fri, 2002-10-18 at 13:55, Oliver Krehan wrote:
Has anyone ever get an Access-db running on more than 2 clients
simultaneously and if yes, could you please give us some helpfull hints ?
Like the other poster said: It seems to depend on the application. The
Access engine (JET?) is used by at
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 18 Oct 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My problem is that whenever I try to copy a large file from a client
machine to a fat32 partition (ext3 works fine) mounted under samba, the
host linux machine will lock up completely. I can, however,
40 workstations, 1 Win2k server, 1WinNT server, 2 Linux servers
The libnss_wins is working (now that I've upgraded to Samba 2.2.5), but
I'd rather be using DNS. Can we take this convesation off the samba
mailing list (since it now longer relates to samaba) and can you
describe your
I develop large laboratory databases with MS Access. All my back end
servers are Samba 2.2.4 on FreeBSD. The key to multi-user success lies
in these configuration points:
1. Always run the Access database application, (Forms, code,
queries, ...) on a client workstation and have the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 17 Oct 2002, Beau Sapach wrote:
Not sure what the problem is here, running Samba 2.2.2 on Solaris 8 as
an NT domain controller for NT4 workstations. When I leave NT
workstations and Samba processes running for a while logins work fine,
1. Are you using the Windows native drivers? If so, update them to
more current drivers from HP. I'm using either NT/Win2k v4.3.2.38 or
Win2k/XP v02.12.02 of the PCL 5E drivers. The MS-Supplied HP LJ4 drivers
(and Lexmark Optra S and more...) have a host of problems. Including
missing
On Fri, 18 Oct 2002, Oliver Krehan wrote:
Hi,
we still have some trouble running a MS Access-database on Samba. We now
tried it with v.2.2.6 on RH 7.3 but still we either get no acces on the
database simultanously or we run in problems with updating the database.
The problem is that we make
You may also want to throw in that the average salary for a UNIX/Linux
admin is A LOT MORE than the MSCE admin. ;)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:samba-admin;lists.samba.org]
On Behalf Of John H Terpstra
Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 7:09 PM
To: Joe E. Fieck
Cc:
Hello everyone
I have a quite weird problem, and I've try a lot of possibility without
any success. It's about file transfert beetween a Windows 2000/98/ME and
a Samba PDC. I've made some tests with a Win 2K PDC too.
Oh yes, English isn't my native language, so please excuse me in advance
for my
On Fri, 18 Oct 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My problem is that whenever I try to copy a large file from a client
machine to a fat32 partition (ext3 works fine) mounted under samba,
the host linux machine will lock up completely. I can, however, copy
small files to the fat32 partition just
On Thu, 2002-10-17 at 14:37, Irving Carrion wrote:
Is there anyone on the list that has been able to get Win2k SP3 working
with the 3.0 alpha version?
I'm able to join but I can NOT log in. I can see the machine account
listed in pass.tdb (using pdbedit -l) and it is also in passwd
I don't think that you need the -y
-A input -p tcp -s 0/0 -d 0/0 137:139 -j ACCEPT
-A input -p udp -s 0/0 -d 0/0 137:139 -j ACCEPT
-A input -p tcp -s obi-wan-ip -d luke-ip 137:139 -j ACCEPT
-A input -p udp -s obi-wan-ip -d luke-ip 137:139 -j ACCEPT
James
James Hubbard wrote:
Since you've
When the database is located on a Windows NT4-Server, the changes can be
seen immediatly on the other 3 pcs. There is also a window popping up which
announcing a sql-error but this seems to have no negative effect on the
database. At a test-run under Win2k-Server the same error appears but also
Message: 7
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 12:31:39 -0400
From: Albert E. Whale [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organization: ABS Computer Technology, Inc.
To: Samba [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Samba] NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED - Samba on Mandrake 8.2
I am attempting to integrate a Linux Samba Server with an NT 4.0 PDC.
On Fri, 2002-10-18 at 07:58, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1 # mkdir /dev/accounts
2. # chgrp accounts /dev/accounts
3. # chmod 0770 /dev/accounts ##i think these are right for
Owner group ###
this looks right to me..
except is is weird to have a share in the dev tree...
are you
Thanks for the reply Brad. I just looked at the registry and it is
indeed set to:
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Netlogon\Parameter
s]
requiresignorseal=dword:
I would be glad to submit a log but no developer has asked for it, so
I'm afraid it will just be
We got it working using Samba 3.0 alpha 21 cvs. Configured as a PDC
using LDAP as the passdb. Encountered the same problem of being able to
join the domain and yet not being able to log in. Line in smb.conf looks
like this :
passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://ldap.internal.avlsi.com, unixsam
I posted the url because it has smbfs patches for
receive timeout
..avoiding D state for offline servers which seemed
your problem.
Don't know the answer to you questions. But, if you
rephrase them to use
smbfs in place of smbmount (which is an helper),
I'd say
1. with patch
2. no
--
On Fri, 2002-10-18 at 10:43, Irving Carrion wrote:
Thanks for the reply Brad. I just looked at the registry and it is
indeed set to:
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Netlogon\Parameter
s]
requiresignorseal=dword:
there should be more than one copy of that key
Hi,
I have a Win2K with Kerberos turned on, acting as PDC on one side (ZEUS).
And a RedHat 7.2 box on another.
I've manage to set Kerberos correctly (found with kdbg that I need to
specify -U in net ads join).
I've tryed everything, with no success.
After that, I have passed some of the tests
On Fri, 18 Oct 2002 08:09:21 -0700 (PDT), Richard Duran [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Thank you for clearing that up. Since we are running
kernel 2.4.18, and this patch appears to apply to
2.4.4, is it safe to assume that this patch need not
be applied?
No. I briefly looked at an 2.4.18something Red
I'm trying to understand odd behavior in my LAN. I'm running Samba
2.2.5 and trying to run it as a PDC.
I have 1-2 win98 clients, 1 XPSP1 client, and 1 Win2kSP3 client.
I've managed to add the XP and 2K machines to the domain successfully,
but
still haven't finished configuring logins to work
On Fri, 18 Oct 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please help is there any way using samba to map a NT share onto a UNIX
(sun Solaris box) i can do it the other way mapping a unix share to an NT
box
Suggest you check out: http://www.obdev.at/products/sharity/
Another way on Sun is to use smbsh.
I am using unixsam. This is what I have in my smb.conf.
passdb backend = tdbsam unixsam
So If I understand Andrew's response correctly, then I won't need a
guest account, right?
I have samba version 2.999+3.0.alpha20-3 which is the latest from the
debian archives.
Thanks!
-Original
confirm 594184
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos More
http://faith.yahoo.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Have you tried releasing the system from the domain (change it to a
workgroup) and then rejoining it to the domain? I had that with one of
my systems and after that all was well. Also make sure that you're ip
settings are correct. The network assistance does some weird stuff to
your system.
I am having a strange problem. I can't map drives from my linux server to
my W2K domain controller. It keeps asking me for a user id password and
no matter which user id password I use I get a message telling me that
the user id and/or password is invalid. I can map drives from the linux
ping windows_machine_name
I personal use dnsmasq with dhcp, search freshmeat.net. It's almost a
dynamic dns solution, but with alot less head archs ( it took me a long
time to get dhcp+bind to do ddns )
The only thing that is a little differant, is you will have to use the
full hostname or
Message: 19
From: Irving Carrion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'John H Terpstra' [EMAIL PROTECTED],
'Joe E. Fieck' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Samba] Samba proposal document.
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 09:42:38 -0400
Organization: All Interior Supply
You may also want to throw in
Hi,
I would like to do the same (resolve win_pc names in linux) too.
However, all my Win2k machines are simple just PCs in the same workgroup
(LAN).
What do I fill in as the WINS server?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:samba-admin;lists.samba.org]
On Behalf Of John H
Had to modify because the list rejected it because out -- of -- office was
detected in the message,.
Adam Lang
Systems Engineer
Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company
http://www.rutgersinsurance.com
- Original Message -
From: Adam Lang [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday,
On Fri, 18 Oct 2002, darren wrote:
Hi,
I would like to do the same (resolve win_pc names in linux) too.
However, all my Win2k machines are simple just PCs in the same workgroup
(LAN).
What do I fill in as the WINS server?
In the smb.conf file [globals] section add:
wins support =
Seeing someone suggest unjoining/joining a computer from a samba PDC
to correct some weirdities, I decided to try that -- got this
message on the 'unjoin' and was wondering if anyone knew what it meant?
This computer was disjoined from the domain MY_DOM, but the
computer
account could not
Hello,
I have downloaded and compiled 2.2.6 to replace my 2.2.6pre.
I spent a large part of the day debugging the startup script because it
seemed to always be starting two nmbd processes instead of one.
Eventually I tried running just /usr/local/samba/bin/nmbd - and still got
two nmbd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 18 Oct 2002, Noel Kelly wrote:
Hello,
I have downloaded and compiled 2.2.6 to replace my 2.2.6pre.
I spent a large part of the day debugging the startup script because it
seemed to always be starting two nmbd processes instead of one.
Thank you!
Buchan Milne wrote:
Message: 7
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 12:31:39 -0400
From: Albert E. Whale [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organization: ABS Computer Technology, Inc.
To: Samba [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Samba] NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED - Samba on Mandrake 8.2
I am attempting to
Thanks guys - I never knew that! Thinking about it all my Samba stuff
before has been integrated into existing Windows domains.
What a wasted afternoon for me!
Cheers
if wins support is set to yes then two nmbd's are running. if you set it
to no it is only one nmbd..
joerg
---
Outgoing
Speaking of the low answer-to-question ratio, here's a question I posted a week ago
but did not get a single answer. Please help me! Before posting, I've searched lots of
docs (unsuccessfully), and the problem is critical for me.
I have a Win98 machine with Russian file names. As suggested in
Hi,
Today I got my first XP in my network. I installed applied the registry
patch and it logged perfectly in the Samba PDC. After that I started the
Windows Update. I couldn´t install the SP1 but I installed all the hotfix
left and them, after a reboot, the XP took almost 30 minutes to log into
I've noticed the list has pretty low answer:question ratio.
I tend to think that many replies go directly to people who post the
questions and those people never bother to share the answers with the
community. I don't think this is fair so we may want to do something in
this regard. We
I've read the man pdbedit and haven't yet found an answer. I'd like to
change the following:
Logoff time:
Kickoff time:
Password last set:
Password can change:
Password must change:
How can I go about changing these attributes WITHOUT using the GUI from
windows?
Any help plz?
IRV
--
To
On Thu, 2002-10-17 at 23:06, DJ Busch wrote:
After receiving no response to yesterday's message, I tried some more web
scouring and more tinkering and dinking around with Samba...and I discovered
what may be a major key to my problem...
I have 3 PC's...2 are Windoze and 1 is Linux.
On 10/18 10:24, Yura Pismerov wrote:
should consider setting up reply-to-list option.
I'd like to know what people think about it...
When I hit reply it goes to Yura. There should be a reply-to-list
but I'm not sure how to set that up in mailing lists.
So probably (my theory), people need to
[accounts]
browseable = yes
path = /dev/accounts
read only = no
write list = accounts
create mask = 770
directory mask = 770
--
Try it with with:
read only = yes
It still my not work the way you want, but at least having a write list
will make sense.
Patrick
--
To
Eric wrote:
On 10/18 10:24, Yura Pismerov wrote:
should consider setting up reply-to-list option.
I'd like to know what people think about it...
When I hit reply it goes to Yura. There should be a reply-to-list
but I'm not sure how to set that up in mailing lists.
So probably (my
same here with Lotus Notes R5! must be his mail client
Yura Pismerov
It maybe isn't the problem now, but it may be that your OS has a cron job, utility, or
patch that modifies the permissions of files/directories under /dev. This is
because it may assume that all files/directories there are devices. For that reason
alone, I would definitely find another
Quick run down of my setup:
NT 4.0 PDC, Samba RedHat 8.0 with samba 2.2.5-10 on it.(Also used RedHat 7.2
with 2.2.6 final as well) with the exact same results.
When I run wbinfo -t, I get Secret is bad 0xc18b. I have been trying to
figure this out for a few days now and can't get it working
Reply to all usually works rather well with any and all MUA's Of
course, people who are direct recipients have to suffer receiving two
copies of the message... (And how I feel for their horrible pain and
inconvenience.)
On Fri, 18 Oct 2002, Eric wrote:
On 10/18 10:24, Yura Pismerov wrote:
Hi All
Is smbmount available for Sun Solaris. If not the what equivalent is
available
Thanks
Vikas
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Guess I'll ask again . . .
[Samba] Winbind and groups Bub Slug [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sun Oct 13 02:35:01 2002
Previous message: [Samba] Strictly Private.
Next message: [Samba] Winbind and groups
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi all,
I'm trying to get a samba
I don't know if this is relevant, but try writeable=no and
browseable=no.
Paulo Fonseca Junior wrote:
Hi folks,
I have installed samba 2.2.6 on FreeBSD 4.7 with sharing above:
[printers]
comment = All printers
path = /var/spool/samba
browseable = yes
printable = yes
I never seem to get any feedback but I solved my XP problem by setting the
Local Security Policy - IP Security Policies to 'Permit'.
Noel
-Original Message-
From: Bruno Gimenes Pereti [mailto:pereti;ump.edu.br]
Sent: 18 October 2002 19:47
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Samba]
hello samba gurus:
Well, I didn't hear back from anyone, and I haven't had any luck in my own
trials. Since my original message, I have built 2.2.6 (final release) and
have had the same problem. Does anyone have any ideas, suggestions, pointers
that would help me track down this error and
You all are overlooking his point.
The point he was raising is that he believes a lot of people are NOT hitting
reply all and just doing a reply back to the message sender, so a lot of
answers are not going to the list.
He is not saying he can't reply to the list. he is saying since the default
I need a old version of samba .tgz
file (less than 2.0) for freebsd ?
do you have it ?
thanks!
Paulo.
I guess it is if you compiled samba with the smbfs option
Vikas Gandhi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi AllIs smbmount available for Sun Solaris. If not the what equivalent isavailableThanksVikas-- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read theinstructions:
Bub Slug wrote:
Guess I'll ask again . . .
[Samba] Winbind and groups Bub Slug [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sun Oct 13 02:35:01 2002
Previous message: [Samba] Strictly Private.
Next message: [Samba] Winbind and groups
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi all,
It is something setup in 'majordomo' -- if a list owner wants replies
to go to the list, by default, they can specify the reply-to address
under list configuration.
Standard practice is to not set the reply-to field on announce type
lists
and to set the reply-to field to point to the list on
my univeristy uses Sun Solaris machines and I'm pretty sure they have the
whole samba suite installed, infact I remember I downloaded the samba
binairies for a Sun Sparc only last week, so I'm pretty sure it does :)
ftp.samba.org/Binary_Packages/solaris/ (Binaries, best to compile from
source
To whom it may concern:
Our institution, SAAMLanguageCenter,
specializes in teaching Spanishas a Second Language
(SSL)to foreigners worldwide, basically High School,
College, University
students and Corporate professionals, who are looking for a practical
program,
with both quality and
Hello,
I have a Windows 2000 Pro SP3 Laptop, and a RH 7.3 server running Samba 2.2.5.
One day it refused to connect to the domain, said it wasn't available, couldn't access
\\server01\user\profile directory, and refused to browse the samba server. Reboots
didn't work. I unjoined the domain,
Hi all,
RH8.0
When I tried to add user as root
# smbpasswd -a AAA
New SMB password:
Retype new SMB password:
unable to open passdb database.
Added user AAA
AAA is an existing user of RH8.0 with password to login. What is the
problem of unable to open passdb database
# which passdb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
It would be nice to update the samba.schema only once, so we should
now also add the account policy values, etc ... to sambaDomainInfo
(all stuff we'll later use for the SAM system) Also add sambaGroup
now, would be nice.(with the stuff we'll
At 20:26 17.10.2002 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
This patch puts a RID allocator into the passdb backend. The outside interface
are two calls.
pdb_max_used_rid is for net rpc vampire to set the maximum RID that the PDC
gave us.
pdb_allocate_rid_for_gid allocates a new RID for the
A 'make clean' can do wonders...
this was th efirst thing I do :-)
In any case, what do you mean by 'HEAD works'? Is your patch against
3.0 + your passdb patch or .. ?
I mean clean HEAD without my patch :-)
On the patch - the 'wrapper' functions need to include a while loop.
do {
At 21:30 17.10.2002 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+++ /home/vlendec/head/source/passdb/pdb_ldap.c Thu Oct 17 21:26:37 2002
@@ -1445,7 +1445,7 @@
} else {
ldap_msgfree(result);
}
- return NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL;
+ return ret;
}
Hi Volker,
thanks a
Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
!!! a few line above I read 'return NT_STATUS_OK' but it
was 'ret = NT_STATUS_OK' :-(
but now it works! :-)
what I need is to test is the non_unix_account stuff.
I browsed the code and the ldap schema changes... if I don't
misunderstand, the the nextrid is
At 09:42 18.10.2002 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
It would be nice to update the samba.schema only once, so we should
now also add the account policy values, etc ... to sambaDomainInfo
(all stuff we'll later use for the SAM system) Also add
At 10:30 18.10.2002 +0200, Ignacio Coupeau wrote:
Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
!!! a few line above I read 'return NT_STATUS_OK' but it
was 'ret = NT_STATUS_OK' :-(
but now it works! :-)
what I need is to test is the non_unix_account stuff.
Should this mail a responde to the id allocator
Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
At 10:30 18.10.2002 +0200, Ignacio Coupeau wrote:
Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
!!! a few line above I read 'return NT_STATUS_OK' but it
was 'ret = NT_STATUS_OK' :-(
but now it works! :-)
what I need is to test is the non_unix_account stuff.
Should
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 17 Oct 2002, Jon Monroe wrote:
Hi Jerry,
I tried disabling kernel oplocks. I also tried disabling in different
combinations:
oplocks
level2 oplocks
posix locking
locking
All variations seem to produce similar results -- 2 extra
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steve,
Please post general use questions to the [EMAIL PROTECTED]
list (see http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba for details).
The samba-technical mailing is for discussions of Samba
internals and development issues. Thanks.
btwmake sure
Hello list members,
I'm trying to add printerdrivers to a Samba 2.2.6 PDC with the Add Printer
Wizard that comes with Windows XP SP1. On Windows I get an Error Message
saying Operation aborted, log.smbd tells me: couldn't find service
::{2227a280-3aea-1069-a2de-08002b30309d}
Did anyone else
sorry, but I answered about about this (the next rid of course):
+ new_rid = (uint32)atol(old_rid_string);
+ if (rid new_rid) new_rid = rid;
+ /* Try to make the modification atomically by enforcing the
+ old value in the delete mod.
1 - 100 of 143 matches
Mail list logo
