On Thu, 27 Feb 2003 09:47:53 -0600
Brad Sagowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
RedHat 7.3 with XFS (using the XFS install disk)
After installation I'd downloaded 2.2.7 src rpm from redhat and
rebuilt it with the --with-acl-support option in the samba.spec file
Did you have acl-dev installed when
For whatever reason, the Makefiles that are generated don't tell gcc to
look in /usr/local/include for header files. You don't need
--libdir=/usr/local/lib and --includedir=/usr/local/include. I believe
that those just tell where you want the libraries and header files
installed when
Hi all
I noticed a pretty strange behaviour regarding file permissions that
sometimes change without any reason. I need to share the following two
directories:
/home/public (owner=root, group=root, perms=0777)
/home/users (owner=root, group=users, perms=0770)
the /home directory is owned
Hi,
I read the changelog, and couldn't help noticing this:
Changes since 2.2.8pre1
---
8) Always use safe_strcpy not pstrcpy for malloc()'d strings
25) Merge from HEAD. Use pstrcpy not safe_strcpy.
Did this change get reverted intentionally ?
regards,
Derkjan de Haan
AlF schrieb:
When a member of group users connects to the [public] or [grp] share
and interacts with them by creating dirs and/or files, something strange
happens because file permissions change to:
/home/public (owner=root, group=root, perms=0755)
/home/users (owner=root, group=users,
Hi.
Im an admin on a small network with about 100 clients running windows 95,
98, 98SE, windows 2000 and XP. Our server is running samba 2.2.5
and sharing one HP Laserjet 5M/MP. Our current setup works fine, but I am
wondering
How do I put windows clients drivers on my samba server to eliminate
Is it possible to allow two Linux computers to browse each other in a
manner similar to the way a winbox and browse a Linux box with Samba? Ya
know, like the network neighborhood thing, not the smbclient get put
thing?
Thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
Is it possible to allow your Liunx box see your winbox, just like the
winbox can see or browse the Linux box with Samba?
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
On Saturday 01 March 2003 09:27 am, pshook wrote:
Is it possible to allow two Linux computers to browse each other in
a
manner similar to the way a winbox and browse a Linux box with
Samba? Ya
know, like the network neighborhood thing, not the smbclient get put
thing?
Check out
Yes, You will need services for unix (~$80) to make it happen. Or another program
such as maestro nfs. We use services for unix and it works fine for us.
-Original Message-
From: pshook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sat 3/1/2003 12:28 PM
To: Samba
I think my previous message didnt reach the list. Therefor a resend.
Hi.
Im an admin on a small network with about 100 clients running windows 95,
98, 98SE, windows 2000 and XP. Our server is running samba 2.2.5
and sharing one HP Laserjet 5M/MP. Our current setup works fine, but I am
wondering
On Sat, 2003-03-01 at 11:56, Tor Bechmann Sørensen wrote:
Also, I am wondering about the legality of the process: That
is, since my users are residents at my dorm, they have their own private
software, and the dorm which is running the server, doesnt have any
windows licenses. I could borrow
On Sat, 2003-03-01 at 12:28, pshook wrote:
Is it possible to allow your Liunx box see your winbox, just like the
winbox can see or browse the Linux box with Samba?
yes
smbclient will do what you want i think
brad
--
Bradley W. Langhorst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe from this list go
On 2003.03.01 17:28 pshook wrote:
Is it possible to allow your Liunx box see your winbox, just like
the
winbox can see or browse the Linux box with Samba?
with gnome2 on my slackware 8.1 box I can use smb:// in the file
manager to view the network. I know that kde also has the ability to
view
Is this without the use of a services on the windows end?
-Original Message-
From: mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2003 1:30 PM
To: pshook
Cc: Samba
Subject: Re: [Samba] Linux to windoze
On 2003.03.01 17:28 pshook wrote:
Is it possible to allow your Liunx box
RH73 samba2.2.7-1.7.3
Just getting a smb server going. Have some users who's login names are
different from windows and Linux. Using a map file to map Linux users
accounts to windows user accounts. When I watch the log.smb I see that the
mapping is taking place however, the authentication
Reason I ask - is because I couldn't get this to work.
-Original Message-
From: mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2003 1:30 PM
To: pshook
Cc: Samba
Subject: Re: [Samba] Linux to windoze
On 2003.03.01 17:28 pshook wrote:
Is it possible to allow your Liunx box
I am having difficulty in try to preserve permissions on Unix files that
are copied from the samba server onto a Windows98 system, and then copied
again via samba back to an 'upload' directory on the samba server.
Specifically, I am sharing /etc (samba read only) for backup purposes,
and while
the samba howto collection covers the print$ stuff accurately for
all the 2.2 version and the 3.0 branch too
Thank you for your answer Bradley. But Im afraid, that I already looked in
the howto collection, and I didnt find information I could use, and gave
up on that. I was hoping someone here
RH73 samba2.2.7-1.7.3
Just getting a smb server going. Have some users who's login names are
different from windows and Linux. Using a map file to map Linux users
accounts to windows user accounts. When I watch the log.smb I see that the
mapping is taking place however, the authentication
How about a different solution:
( cd / ; tar cvzf /path/to/samba/share/etc-$( date +%Y-%m-%d ).tar.gz etc/ )
Then backup the tarball on your windows box. Now you have all of the file
permissions stored inside the tarball.
The problem is that file permissions on Windows and UNIX don't map
On Sat, 2003-03-01 at 16:05, Tor Bechmann Sørensen wrote:
the samba howto collection covers the print$ stuff accurately for
all the 2.2 version and the 3.0 branch too
Thank you for your answer Bradley. But Im afraid, that I already looked in
the howto collection, and I didnt find
Thanks again for your reply. I did read the part you mention. I did
understand how to make the print$ share. The docs are clear on this part.
I can now specify my question a bit more: what to do from there on to put
the nessecary files in that share?
I am not using windows myself, but my users
On Sat, 2003-03-01 at 17:00, Tor Bechmann Sørensen wrote:
Thanks again for your reply. I did read the part you mention. I did
understand how to make the print$ share. The docs are clear on this part.
I can now specify my question a bit more: what to do from there on to put
the nessecary
I found the cvs repository at
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/librsync/librsync/
The sourceforge project was just setup a couple of days ago. That must have been why
google could not find it yesterday.
I believe the samba cvs site for librsync is now deprecated.
The 0.9.5.1
Thank you for your help, so far.
the docs are equally clear on this part.
Well, maybe if youre an expert, or someone already having experience in
doing this with a NT printer server, but not from my point of view. Also I
dont think the docs are very clear as to that doing this from a windows
On Sat, 1 Mar 2003 01:57:23 + (GMT), John H Terpstra wrote:
On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, Jim Wharton wrote:
Keep in mind however, this only hides the share in Network Neighborhood/My
Network Places/explorer. It is still possible to do a net view command from
the command line and see
On Fri, 28 Feb 2003 09:26:47 -0600, Henrickson, Den wrote:
[sharename$]
[]
The $ creates a hidden Windows share. To access you would have to do
Right, thanks. I did actually forget that trick.
But, uhm... can it be used also with the [netlogon] share? Will it be
still correctly
When trying to add the drivers downloaded extracted from HP
(lj456ps.inf from lj632en.exe) I get the following message:
Unable to install HP LaserJet 5P/5MP Postscript, Windows NT 4.0 or 200,
Intel driver. Operation could not be completed.
I also tried installing win95/98 drivers. In this
I could do that with Red Hat 7.2 Using smb://netbios name/folder. However,
it was apparently removed from Red Hat 8.0. So, it depends on version of
Linux.
Tom
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf
Of Jim
Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2003 5:03 PM
To:
hi marco!
Which, in turn, leaves the share still visible in Network Neighborhood
etc, as I initially reported.
Go figure. :)
i don't understand your question. - we're using browsable = no over
years. but i did not find, where u'll see the share. i can't see the
share with 'net view' and not
Unable to install HP LaserJet 5P/5MP Postscript, Windows NT 4.0 or 200,
Intel driver. Operation could not be completed.
maybe it's this:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;158042
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
Third problem is locally stored profiles. How I could make such set up that when
user logs out from WS , then WS
would copy changed profile back to server and delete it from WS ?
It's question of security and hard disk space..
you can do that with a setting in gpedit.msc
don't remember
On Fri, 2003-02-28 at 13:09, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[netlogon] share is like that:
[netlogon]
comment = Network Logon Service
path = /home/samba/netlogon
guest ok = no
writable = no
browseable = yes
public = yes
this is what i'm using ...
[netlogon]
path =
Hello
I just compiled Samba-2.2.8pre2 on 4 different systems:
1) Solaris 7 + cc: WorkShop Compilers 5.0 98/12/15 C 5.0
2) Solaris 9 + cc: WorkShop Compilers 5.0 98/12/15 C 5.0
3) Solaris 9 + cc: Forte Developer 7 C 5.4 2002/03/09
4) IRIX 6.5 + MIPSpro Compilers: Version 7.30
It compiled OK on
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Christopher R. Hertel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am interested in looking into this, but I won't have time until the
weekend.
...
In the mean time, I have modified smbw_dir.c to include a new function
smbw_browse_workgroup_alternate() with the following patch.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Christopher R. Hertel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am interested in looking into this, but I won't have time until the
weekend.
...
In the mean time, I have modified smbw_dir.c to include a new function
Christopher R. Hertel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Derrell,
Can you give me a better idea of what you are trying to do?
Above, you say you are trying to find all hosts that are members of a given
workgroup. The question is: why? What is it that you are actually trying
to accomplish?
I'm
As some of you may have noticed, the UL builds on the farm don't work. The
culprit is the pre- 0.5 heimdal that is installed, as it doesn't have
AP_OPTS_USE_SUBKEY, which is needed to do password changes. Unless someone
knows how to accomplish password changes to a win KDC without it, we
Hi,
The scenario I am testing is this:
- Open an MS word file from windows client A
- Disconnect the network cable from that windows client (emulate client
failure)
- Try to open the file from windows client B - file is locked.
- Wait a few minutes (see below - the exact time is the issue here)
Jim McDonough [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As some of you may have noticed, the UL builds on the farm don't work. The
culprit is the pre- 0.5 heimdal that is installed, as it doesn't have
AP_OPTS_USE_SUBKEY, which is needed to do password changes. Unless someone
knows how to accomplish
On Sat, 1 Mar 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Christopher R. Hertel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm working on providing a tree-style view of the network in a fashion similar
to what Windows Explorer does. The top level of an SMB/CIFS network is
something like Microsoft Windows Network. The
Okay, I understand the problem now.
The problem is that W/9x boxes do not recognize the generic *SMBSERVER
name in the NBT Session Setup Request. Also, W/9x boxes will send back an
error if the called name is not correct in the NBT Session Setup Request.
You should get a NEGATIVE SESSION
On Sat, 1 Mar 2003, Christopher R. Hertel wrote:
Okay, I understand the problem now.
The problem is that W/9x boxes do not recognize the generic *SMBSERVER
name in the NBT Session Setup Request. Also, W/9x boxes will send back an
error if the called name is not correct in the NBT Session
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 01:44:22AM +0100, Love wrote:
- Using a keytab file would solve the problem below. Using /etc/krb5.keytab
is bad idea, how about a own keytab for samba ? Doing hoops of strace stuff
seems, well, strange.
Why is using /etc/krb5.keytab a bad idea? The only reason
What is it that limit samba to root ? When I use samba with afs beeing root
will certenly not help samba access files, what else do samba need.
SAMBA does need to bind to privileged ports.
-- Luke
--
Luke Howard | PADL Software Pty Ltd | www.padl.com
Luke Howard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What is it that limit samba to root ? When I use samba with afs beeing root
will certenly not help samba access files, what else do samba need.
SAMBA does need to bind to privileged ports.
Ok, sure. Now concentrate on the other issues :)
Its not that
Charles Bueche wrote:
Hi,
OK, I understand why this fix wasn't implemented as such, but still, my
problem remain. Here is a copy of my post to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject is
Samba doesn't free network resource with XP clients, and the previous
post, on 21.2.03, title 2.2.7a breaks on ATM
On Fri, 2003-02-28 at 13:09, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[netlogon] share is like that:
[netlogon]
comment = Network Logon Service
path = /home/samba/netlogon
guest ok = no
writable = no
browseable = yes
public = yes
this is what i'm using ...
[netlogon]
path =
Maruyama, Kazutoshi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I have a question.
I am try to setting up SAMBA 1.9.17p4.
(I am using OpenVMS 6.2, so I guess I cannot use the other samba version.)
My windows cliant is Windows 2000.
As I pointed out in my previous message, for that to work, you really
need
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Carl Gunnar Linden, MSL Stockholm Sweden.) wrote:
I am running OpenVMS V7.3 and
Compaq TCP/IP Services for OpenVMS Alpha Version V5.3 - ECO 1
I try to run SAMBA 2.2.4 or 2.2.7a. It works with TCPIP V5.3-18 but
I think it stopped working since I applied the
Date: Sat Mar 1 10:47:38 2003
Author: tridge
Update of /home/cvs/samba/source/smbd
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv28920
Modified Files:
server.c
Log Message:
i forgot to commit the privilege db init call
Revisions:
server.c1.409 = 1.410
52 matches
Mail list logo
