Hi
i am trying to install on my Redhat 9 samba-3.0alpha24-1.i386.rpm
[root]# rpm -Uvh /usr/src/samba-3.0alpha24-1.i386.rpm
warning: /usr/src/samba-3.0alpha24-1.i386.rpm: V3 DSA signature: NOKEY,
key ID 2f87af6f
error: Failed dependencies:
perl(Net::LDAP::LDIF) is needed by
Hi,
I've been trying to do this compile as well (but on Debian) however it seems
that some of the acl functions have been moved from the acl libs to attr. I
can get Samba to compile by adding -lattr to the places in configure where
-lacl occur.
Regards,
Matt
PS. I haven't actually got samba
google: Net::LDAP::LDIF +rpm
result: perl-ldap-0.20-1.noarch RPM
Yeri Swamy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
i am trying to install on my Redhat 9 samba-3.0alpha24-1.i386.rpm
[root]# rpm -Uvh /usr/src/samba-3.0alpha24-1.i386.rpm
warning:
google: Net::LDAP::LDIF +rpm
result: perl-ldap-0.20-1.noarch RPM
Yeri Swamy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
i am trying to install on my Redhat 9 samba-3.0alpha24-1.i386.rpm
[root]# rpm -Uvh /usr/src/samba-3.0alpha24-1.i386.rpm
warning:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alceu R. de Freitas Jr. wrote:
| You can check for another antivirus program to run on
| the Samba server, but all them are comercial too, as
| Mcafee. But the best solution is to keep the
| workstations running an antivirus program.
|
| If you´re
--- David Morel [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alceu R. de Freitas Jr. wrote:
| You can check for another antivirus program to run
on
| the Samba server, but all them are comercial too,
as
| Mcafee. But the best solution is to keep the
|
Hello All,
so lets summarize a bit the trouble which is out there with Samba and
WinXP Pro using Samba as PDC. (Also something for the howto for John :-)
Trouble
---
* very unsatisfactory performace when clients log on
* trouble with no domain controller even because WinXP client didnt
Hi All,
I tried to apply server=domain for a samba server domain member with
samba-3.0alpha23 and samba-3.0alpha24. In each cases, ads_connect:
Connection refused .. message appeared when trying to join the domain. But
net rpc testjoin says ok.
The main point of this mail is that
I have a small problem that when a shared database gets saved by someone
in the group it sets the wrx bits to 700 or 766. This prevents the next
person to use the database from having read access to the file or some
such. Is there any way that I can set this share folder to save with
the owner
Ok, I installed the devel packages and Samba was able to compile correctly:
./configure --with-acl-support
make
make install
That seemed to work perfectly
However, I am still having the same problem.
I took some screen shots to show you.
http://bharris.f2o.org/win.html
Any other ideas?
Hi Again,
Same old same old. Here's a different spin on the question, though. Now I'm
wondering if there's a way to run login scripts automatically on a 2000 machine. I've
got Samba set up properly (I think). It's running as a PDC, without password
encryption (due to the way the rest of
Hi,
I have a domain server with Windows Server 2003 y i cannot access to
shared resources from Linux. I have used both Samba 2.2 and Samba 3.0,
but logging in with Administrator account it show me follow error:
NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED
Why?
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the
Hi,
Now ACL's work I'm up against another hurdle, I've got UMFD connected to my
Samba 3 PDC. I have the following lines in my smb.conf. The adding user's
works perfectly.
add user script = /usr/sbin/useradd -m -g 100 -s /bin/bash %u
add machine script = /usr/sbin/useradd -d /dev/null -g 100 -s
On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 06:28:17AM -0400, Joel Hammer wrote:
Do oplocks serve any purpose?
Yes, they are one of the major features of this protocol.
Why not disable them.
That is a useful idea.
Jeremy.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 11:35:20AM +0100, Louis Sabet wrote:
Hi all,
Having a very specific problem here:
I have a working RedHat9 server running Samba 2.2.7 (the release that comes
with RH9), acting as a PDC/File Server to around 15 WinXP Pro client
workstations.
This all works
On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 03:31:29PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 06:28:17AM -0400, Joel Hammer wrote:
Do oplocks serve any purpose?
Yes, they are one of the major features of this protocol.
Why not disable them.
That is a useful idea.
Doh ! (Too early in
On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 03:33:01PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 11:35:20AM +0100, Louis Sabet wrote:
Hi all,
Having a very specific problem here:
I have a working RedHat9 server running Samba 2.2.7 (the release that comes
with RH9), acting as a PDC/File
I meant to say, do oplocks have any good purpose on a print share?
Joel
On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 03:31:29PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 06:28:17AM -0400, Joel Hammer wrote:
Do oplocks serve any purpose?
Yes, they are one of the major features of this protocol.
i don't need encryption. what parts of win2k support would cause a
problem, and can those part of win2k be changed/disabled?
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Novosielski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 15:18
To: Samba List (E-mail)
Subject: Re: [Samba] UNIX passwords
thanks. problem solved
-Original Message-
From: Ron Bombard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 13:35
To: Erik Soderquist
Subject: RE: [Samba] UNIX passwords
I use my unix /etc/passwd file for auth. I've never used smbpasswd.
I just set security = user, and encrypt
Hi everyone,
I need a little help. I have compiled samba(2.2.8a) on aix 4.3.3 oslevel 9.
Everything seems to run fine until you try and transfer a file from a windows station
to Samba that is 1GB. Then it starts spitting out errors like there is not enough
space for the file even though
what was the last binary built for this platform? I have been unable to
get a compiler to work on this machine due to licensing problems but
would like to update. currently at v. 2.2.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
I dowloaded from samba.org samba-3.0alpha24..
I refered http://samba.org/~jht/NT4migration/Samba-HOWTO-Collection.pdf
chapter 31
it also mentioned in the how chapter 31 that it is a rough explanation
but i decided to follow this and started doing things as i explaned below
i looked google and
On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 07:06:02PM +0200, Honza Houstek wrote:
On Thu, 5 Jun 2003, Mal Beaton wrote:
[...]
This was identified in an article sent to the samb lists about samba not
recognising win xp logoffs
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;316740
I have been getting spam through the samba list. Is anyone able to post
to the list without subscribing?
--
Jerry Sloan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
fP Technologies, Inc
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
this is a test to see if someone not suscribed can still post.
_
Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL
i just tested, yes, an email address that has not subscribed can post to
the list.
-Original Message-
From: Jerry Sloan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 14:28
To: Samba List
Subject: [Samba] Spam to the list, plus the Nigerian Scam
I have been getting spam through
We have replaced an NT 4.0 server (PDC) at a customer site with a new
server running Windows 2000. Now we cannot map to the Samba share on our
HP UX machine. I am sure is some kind of permission thing but not sure
where to look. I did not do the original Samba install and I know little
to nothing
Unfortuneately, with the way that the samba list is set up, our email
addresses show up on google. So... we have all been harvested and sold.
I, for one, like to hit reply and get the list address instead of just the
person who I am helping. I have to retrain myself to hit reply to all (do
you
Another thing that is rude is for list members to set a vacation
auto-reply to a mailing list...
--
Jerry Sloan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
fP Technologies, Inc
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
You know, I was thinking the same thing. Okay thanks for letting me know you
are gone... did you forget that you are subscribed to a high traffic mailing
list? You may get 1 or 2 or 80 emails while you are gone.
I know, I'm a complainer.
Jim Wharton
Network Administrator
Alachua County Property
The problem is that the messages from this list come addressed From: each person
instead of the list. There's no way to set up the vacation message to know that the
message is from a list (at least on our server).
Dan
-- Original Message --
From: Jim
Dan Shadix said on Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 01:22:54PM -0600:
The problem is that the messages from this list come addressed From: each person
instead of the list. There's no way to set up the vacation message to know that the
message is from a list (at least on our server).
Then your server is
Please see the attached file.--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
I have an open samba share right now that anyone can get to and
read/write, I want to make it only readable so I don't get viruses
trying to infect the machine (not like it would do anything anyway).
What I want to do is set up a share that is writable so I can copy the
files over to the
Hi there
I'm running a samba cvs server in a windows domain with a W2K PDC. I want to
authenticate windows users through ssh. I'm able to login with a windows user to the
server on the server himself but when I want to login via a windows client It doesn't
work. The connection is refused.
Jim Wharton wrote on Friday, 6 June 2003 6:59 a.m.:
I, for one, like to hit reply and get the list address instead of
just the person who I am helping. I have to retrain myself to hit
reply to all (do you hear a violin?)
I'm afraid this is a highly religious issue when it comes to mailing
Does anyone know if samba uses the ulimits(/etc/security/limits) of a box(AIX/Linux)?
If so is there any way to disable that?
Thanks...
Neil
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
I did once reply to a Nigerian spammer. Hundreds of times.
The neat thing was I can change my address since I run sendmail, so he
couldn't just screen me out.
He wrote me and asked me to stop.
Which, BTW, is how we could easily stop all spamming. If we all respond to
the spammers, that would
On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 04:07:38PM +0200, Daniel Zeiss wrote:
Hello All,
so lets summarize a bit the trouble which is out there with Samba and
WinXP Pro using Samba as PDC. (Also something for the howto for John :-)
OK, thanks for that, perhaps a document could be created for the docs
dir
Unfortunately, many people set their MUA's (Outlook/Express) mail rules
filter to provide the vacation message, then leave it running when they're
gone. Others set the rule and close Outlook, then when they get back from
vacation and download all their messages everyone gets a vacation message
Actually, some people have already fought back, getting them in their
own game - see http://www.reversescam.com
Back to Samba now... :-)
On Thu, 2003-06-05 at 15:46, Joel Hammer wrote:
I did once reply to a Nigerian spammer. Hundreds of times.
The neat thing was I can change my address
Hi,
OK, thanks for that, perhaps a document could be created for the docs
dir for the 2.2 series, assuming one won't be needed for 3.0 release.
Most of it is Windows stuff, so 3.0 will still need some of the patching
(tweaking)
But as for the rest, where did you find
out about it? Is it
Joel Hammer wrote on Friday, 6 June 2003 8:46 a.m.:
Which, BTW, is how we could easily stop all spamming. If we all
respond to the spammers, that would but them out of business in one
day. So, all of us on this list should agree to respond to the
spammer hitting us, telling him we are
Admin please remove this person. he keeps spamming the list
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 4:53 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Samba] Re: Submited (004756-3463)
Please see the attached file.
--
To unsubscribe from
Actually, a proper vacation code is very simple.
If the recipient's email address is not listed in the To: or Cc: lines of the
message, don't reply.
A bit more considerate vacation program adds the condition:
If I have sent a notice to this sender already, don't reply.
Jonathan Johnson wrote:
Dear Sirs,
we're having some inconviniences on files used in a private system,
developed to suit the company.
this system's files are located in /var/wsystems and permissions are
granted 4777 acordingly to all files.
When we start up and work in this system with ONE user alone, we have no
thanks
-Original Message-
From: [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 16:05
To: Erik Soderquist
Subject: Re: [Samba] SCO OpenServer 5
Erik,
ftp://ftp2.caldera.com/pub/skunkware/osr5/vols
has 2.2.6
HTH
Matt Flaig
Elysian Fields Software L.L.C.
what was the last
Hello Brandon!
On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 10:27:12AM -0500, Brandon Lederer wrote:
Admin please remove this person. he keeps spamming the list
You cannot conlude that tino is the author of this email just because
his email-addres appears in the From: field in the mail's header. This
can be
I am running samba version 2.2.5 on Redhat.
I am using a windows 2000 computer to try to join a samba domain.
I have created the appropriate accounts, and workgroup file sharing is
working.
I get the following errors in the log file when I attempt to join the
domain:
[2003/06/05 17:59:26, 0]
The way we have it setup is as follows:
Each machine is populated with a local startup and shutdown
scripts, and the local Group Policy is modified to activate this.
(Even though I found the registry changes which happen, they alone
are not enough. So I could not automate this with a VBScript or
What does wbinfo -u, wbinfo -g, getent passwd, getent group say?
- Original Message -
From: Christophe Reynders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 5:22 PM
Subject: [Samba] CVS over SSH
Hi there
I'm running a samba cvs server in a windows domain
Here is my smb.conf file which works one one machine but not on another. Please help.
**
This message is intended for the addressee named and may contain
privileged information or confidential information or both. If you
are not
Dear Sir,
I have a doubt regarding samba log format. I have gone through the
smb.conf file.. I have a few queries regarding samba log.
1. Is there any specific format log for samba log
2. I have the samba source 2.2 which c file i have to modify..
3. Is there any specific tool for samba log
4.
when trying to log on to my samba server (3.0a24 with LDAP) I get a
message about the domain not being available or the machine account is
not available. In the event log this is what the Netlogon service
reports about the error.
---
The domain of this computer, MEANSPC has been downgraded
Please see the attached file.--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Jeffrey D. Means wrote:
when trying to log on to my samba server (3.0a24 with LDAP) I get a
message about the domain not being available or the machine account is
not available. In the event log this is what the Netlogon service
reports about the error.
---
The domain of this computer,
I just downloaded Samba ver2.2.8a onto my RH server and I'm unsure on
how to properly configure samba. I've seen documentation online for the
older versions which contain instructions for running ./configure, make,
and make install. I don't see ./configure in my samba-2.2.8a directory
so I'm
| Ok, I installed the devel packages and Samba was
| able to compile correctly:
|
| ./configure --with-acl-support
| make
| make install
|
| That seemed to work perfectly
|
| However, I am still having the same problem.
|
| I took some screen shots to show you.
| http://bharris.f2o.org/win.html
What type of file did you download?
Maybe its all set to run? Maybe you don't have to configure it?
Joel
On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 08:52:31PM -0400, marvc wrote:
I just downloaded Samba ver2.2.8a onto my RH server and I'm unsure on
how to properly configure samba. I've seen documentation online
I am trying to move the lock directory to another location. In my smb.conf I have the
below line.
lock directory = /usr/local/samba/machine_name/var/locks
However when I try to start samba I get the following error.
[2003/06/06 16:03:13, 2] lib/interface.c:add_interface(81)
added interface
This is my pam config for ssh:
#%PAM-1.0
auth required pam_nologin.so
auth sufficient pam_winbind.so
auth required pam_unix.so use_first_pass shadow
auth required pam_env.so # [1]
accountsufficient pam_winbind.so
accountrequired pam_unix.so
On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 05:59:51PM -0500, ganapathy murali krishnan wrote:
The way we have it setup is as follows:
Each machine is populated with a local startup and shutdown
I guess you are doing this to get around the problem of the logoff not
completing properly and leaving connections
Hi all,
I have a problem with the file permissions on our Samba server
(Version 2.2.8) with a program that we're using. This program want's to
save some configuration into the homedirectory of it's user. The problem
is that this program is opening this file read only, so it can't save the
My original email said most..you have to customise the script in
/etc/mgetty-sendfax/ which is called when a fax is recieved...sorry
forgot its name, I haven't touched this server in ages!
I haven't actually got around to sending faxes with this setup; most of
our users need to sign them anyway so
--On Thursday, June 05, 2003 15:33:01 + [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 11:35:20AM +0100, Louis Sabet wrote:
Hi all,
Having a very specific problem here:
I have a working RedHat9 server running Samba 2.2.7 (the release that
comes with RH9), acting as a PDC/File Server to
I must have made a mistake and clicked on a different
file then I thought in windows. I was just trying to
illustrate how the uid's and gid's show up under the
windows security tab and not the domain mappings.
If you check the acl's under linux it correctly maps
domain names and groups from
Your EMail with subject 'Approved', sent to the recipient(s)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
contains a file attachment of type '[pif]'. Our organization does not accept files of
this type by email. The message has NOT been delivered to the recipients.
If you have further questions, please contact the IT
My smb.conf at present is devoid of oplocks-related entries as
I'm having a
bit of a tough time deciding exactly how to use them. I have however
already tried disabling them, having followed a bunch of googled
newsgroup
threads, but nothing I do seems to change the behaviour I described
I tryed to decrease users number but it didn't help. In order to check a
network printer connected to a workstation I had to leave at least 2
workstations. I meant the network printers not connected to the server
but ones connected to workstations.
Thomas Wong wrote:
What happens when you go
Hi,
I start to use Samba with difficulties for now but I just blame me
I have the following problem when I change my smb.conf I reload or
restart Samba but most of the time my changes are not available
I have to reboot my server
is there anything special to do?
Thanks
Raymond
--
To unsubscribe
Dude, it's UNIX/Linux. You should never reboot ;)
That's not normal. Did you try to stop the service and start it again, like so:
samba stop
samba start
and not
samba restart
Are you sure the daemons are dead after issueing a samba stop.
Raymond Gree [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello List-
I have a question:
I have several Samba 2.0.9 servers on HPUX 11.00 in one domain (domain A),
and users running Win XP that exist an Active Directory domain (Domain B).
The Samba servers are running user level authentication. I have some of the
users in Domain B that cannot
Hi
Just wondering if anyone could help with regarding the following. I have a
number of Linux servers within an NT domain and I can access all of them.
But I have a linux server behind our (raptor) firewall - samba has been
configured on it and appears to be running. What I want to know is how
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 28 May 2003, Paul Eggleton wrote:
Hi there,
I am trying to debug a problem with winbind crashing, but the panic
action I have set in smb.conf doesn't seem to be working.
This is probably a bug then, but for the meantime just run
If samba and xntpd are running, you're done! Samba is a time server.
Setting the smb.conf parameter time server = yes will cause Samba to
advertise itself as a time server in the browse list through nmbd.
Regardless of this setting, clients can still set their time with the net
time command.
Unless I'm forgetting something, you should just need to open up your firewall for UDP
on ports 135, 137, and 138, and TCP on ports 135, 139, and 445. That might even be
overkill for your setup - you might not need 445 open.
Greg Hirsch
Product Support/IT Specialist
LOGICARE Corporation
(800)
This mail is probably spam. The original message has been attached
along with this report, so you can recognize or block similar unwanted
mail in future. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
Content preview: This is a multipart message in MIME format Please see
the attached
Hello,
I have a problem regarding samba-3.0 (alpha24 on RedHat 9) and Windows XP
professional clients.
Samba is in PDC mode with LDAP backend. All other windows clients (incl.
2000) working properly.
I can join the domain with XP client successfully (says welcome to
domain), but when I try to
log
I've gotten winbind and pam_mount to play nice, only to run into a bug in
glibc that hangs the smbmount...
http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82820
From the author of pam_mount:
I did find some behavior in pam_mount that was non-conducive to local
accounts.
That is now fixed
Well... it depends upon how you want your machines to see each other. Gregis
close. But you don't need 135 UDP or TCP 445. TCP 137 138 need to be
opened to allow the machines on the other side through.
But make sure that you ONLY open those ports for the machine to machine
traffic. And write a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 4 Jun 2003, patti c. wrote:
- Both XP and Linux are able to ping each other by ip and hostname
- ifconfig on Linux shows 10.0.1.255 as the broadcast address, mask as
255.255.255.0
- ipconfig on XP shows NodeType = broadcast, subnet mask
Hello,
I'm running Samba 2.2.2 on a Solaris 7 machine and we are just now
deploying Win2K to our desktops. We have discovered that on the Win2K
boxes that mapped Samba drives will need to be remapped after a user
logs out and logs back in. I've done a google search and seen the
question listed
Hello all,
I was wondering if anyone had any docs on authenticating windoze clients
to an SMB share.
Thanks!
Alainna C. Wonders
Systems Analyst
Glenelg Country School
--
perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5, (41*2), sqrt(7056), (unpack(c,H)-2),
oct(115), 10);' - Anthony Placilla,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 5 Jun 2003, Badia Tejedor Alvaro wrote:
[2003/06/05 10:02:16, 0] smbd/server.c:main(741)
smbd version 3.0alpha24-SuSE started.
Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2003
[2003/06/05 10:03:24, 0] lib/module.c:smb_load_module(40)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, Dan Am wrote:
Hi folks,
trying to get up-to-date here. Anyone know of a concise
doc listing the main news (from an admin/user perspective)
of 3.0 to 2.2
I'm assuming you mean from 2.2 - 3.0. Will be in the release
notes
--On Friday, June 06, 2003 11:07:25 +0200 David Morel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Louis Sabet wrote:
| --On Thursday, June 05, 2003 15:33:01 + [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|
| On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 11:35:20AM +0100, Louis Sabet wrote:
|
| Hi all,
|
|
Yes,
You can either use the include directive to include a configuration file
on the fly, based on the server name the client connects to.
e.g. include = %L.conf
Better yet, and what works for me currently (not just theory) is to
runmultiple smbd / nmbd processes on the same machine, a smbd
We have 2 segments of the corporate network,
which are connected by a unstable(~90% uptime) 2Mbps link.
This link cannot be made better.
So, we are to use 2 WINS servers(both Samba 2.2.8a) - one server in one segment.
However, if 2 clients register on 2 different WINS servers,
they can't mount
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Stier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If the recipient's email address is not listed in the To: or
Cc: lines of the
message, don't reply.
Unfortunately Outlook doesn't offer this capability, as far as I know.
A bit more considerate vacation program
-Original Message-
From: Paul Eggleton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The problem with this is a lot of spammers use false return
addresses or impersonate real addresses.
Yes. This is highly annoying because bounce messages to those idiots stack
up in the mail queue of our mail
The error on the windows side when opening this particular shared
document in Word is speaks of the document path and name being wrong.
the Document name or path is not valid
even copying the document (linux side) to a simpler, short name has not
resolved the issue.
adding :
mangled
I am still getting the error about the domain not being available.
including logs and win event log...
--- samba.log at debug 10
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# cat /var/log/samba/samba.log
[2003/06/06 10:29:56, 3, pid=14390, effective(0, 2147483404), real(0,
0)] lib/util.c:unix_clean_name(580)
What about having two samba boxes, one running as a
wins proxy and the other as wins server?
You could use a tool to check the link avaliability
(there are some of them already) with a tool, and when
the link is download, you can stop samba and restart
it with a different configuration file (and
I'm having problems when I restart the smb server with it not coming back
up. As near as I can tell it's actually NMBD that's having the issue. I'm
running RedHat 9.0 on a Compaq ML-370 with Dual 1.2GHz P3s and I just
upgraded Samba to 2.2.8a-1 after having this same problem with 2.2.7a
When I
[ Read the recent posts to
SUMMARY: [Samba] Samba asPDC with WinXP Clients - headache thread
first. Changed the subject line so this becomes a new thread.]
Each machine is populated with a local startup and shutdown
scripts, and the local Group Policy is modified to activate this.
Where do I
Are you sure that all of the nmbd processes are actually stopping the first time you
issue the command. I had to change the killproc command to killall on one system so
that nmbd would actually be completely stopped.
Dan
-- Original Message --
From: D.
Hello. I am looking to setup a domain server. i have tried and tried. This is the
closest I have gotten so far. I am getting an error that I need some help with.
I am running Caldera 3.1.1
I compiled samba with the makerpms for Caldera (I pray this will always work; as for
the build with I
I am trying to test Samba3 in our environment. I used to use smbpasswd -j
domain to join the machine to the domain. Now I need to do net join
something, but I am having difficulty figuring out what exactly I need to do
to make it work.
Thanks
Brandon
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the
Thanks for the hints.
I've just implemented the second way you've mentioned. It work's (not as I
wanted), but I think there's a small problem. When you use bind interfaces
only = yes you have to set up what interfaces you would like to bind. So,
you must set loopback interface in interfaces
1 - 100 of 294 matches
Mail list logo
