Miles,
Poor show on my part to reply twice, but I should also have reminded you
to turn off the WebClient. That also can destroy network browsing.
- John T.
On Mon, 15 Sep 2003, Miles Bintz wrote:
I'm also experiencing this problem.
I'm running Samba version 2.2.7 with the security rollup
Hi,
I´m currently testing samba-3.0.0rc4 as a pdc with acl-support.
The box runs with debian-linux and a xfs-enabled 2.4.22-kernel.
I have defined a share which is located on a xfs-partition.
(changing acls with setfacl works well)
I activated the flag : nt acl support = yes
If I now
Hi:
Im sorry I didnt answer before, but I just couldnt, I was too busy at my
job.
Tom, I did as you suggest me but it was a surprise, I dont have acccess
to that web site!! I was not prompted for a password or any thing alike but
it was prohibited from my server. Nevertheless my workstation
I upgraded to 2.2.8a a week ago and all hell broke loose with my roaming
profiles.
What I eventually found I had to do to get them them working again was (some
of this is probably overkill as I was dumb enough not to save my server's
SID before upgrading):
1) Load sp3 on all my w2k machines.
2)
Hi Mark,
I run Samba 2.2.8 on my Red Hat 9.
Both smbd and nmbd are running OK. ps -aux | grep mbd
shows the 2 processes, plus, smbclient works fine,
thanks to Christopher.
The Samba server resides on a host with IP 10.10.6.31.
I got this from the smbclient run below:
[EMAIL
Hi !
On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 08:31:39AM +0200, Christopher Odenbach wrote:
I don't know about samba 3, but in samba 2.2.x acl support was an option
to be set at configure time (before compiling).
The smb.conf option nt acl support only maps the ordinary unix
permissions to acl-like
Hi,
I'm using debian woody with samba (2.2.3a-12.3). After installing
2.2.8a everything that worked, still works. What didn't work, still
doesn't work.
Sharing files works properly.
I'd like to share a printer via the samba server. When I go to the
printersfaxes share in explorer, no
Hi,
I'm using debian woody with samba (2.2.3a-12.3). After installing
2.2.8a everything that worked, still works. What didn't work, still
doesn't work.
Hereunder is my smb.conf, /etc/lprng/printcap, and the logfile that
contains errors in relation to the printers (i get them when i go to
Hi!
I have set up my Linux clients to authorise against a win2k pdc, I'm
using Winbindd to the job. I have edited /etc/nsswitch.conf and
/etc/pam.d/system-auth and added/modified the parameters as described
here:
http://www.isomedia.com/homes/kpuckett/Windows_Domain_Logins_from_RH7.3.htm
It
Hi again,
I tried all you said, but now I found the problem, I think.
It has nothing to do with wins or not. My dns works very good and is
definetly not missconfigured. But when I change in smb.conf security =
domain to user, as described in the how-to's, the windows xp
professional boxes (not
Christopher Odenbach wrote:
Hi,
I'm using debian woody with samba (2.2.3a-12.3). After installing
2.2.8a everything that worked, still works. What didn't work, still
doesn't work.
Hereunder is my smb.conf, /etc/lprng/printcap, and the logfile that
contains errors in relation to the printers (i
Christopher Odenbach wrote:
Hi,
I'm using debian woody with samba (2.2.3a-12.3). After installing
2.2.8a everything that worked, still works. What didn't work, still
doesn't work.
Hereunder is my smb.conf, /etc/lprng/printcap, and the logfile that
contains errors in relation to the printers
do a strings or nm to see if the symbol is in there, if it is, check
your library search path. My experience is to always link statically,
that way, if it runs, it runs even after installing buggy quality
patches from HP.
I have installed the rc3 on several machines, but it only runs on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi list,
I just installed samba-2.2.8 and cups-1.1.19. Everthing went fine,
except for the point'n'print feature. I can successfully upload the
driver, but after if I try to view the printer properties after that. I
get a nice windows on my xp box
On Mon, 2003-09-15 at 13:45, Kevin Anderson wrote:
I'm finding our employees' roaming profiles are not being updated. They were
initially created correctly, they copy down onto a new machine, but updates are not
put back onto the server. I've also noticed that smbstatus does not show any
Oh, it's fixed in 3.0?
But in the previous post, I didn't describe my situation in a very clear
way, let me say it more clear here
see if it's the exact same problem you recalled.
When the folder I want to delete is being opened or the subfolder
is being opened in the Windows Explorer, then
Hi,
yesterday i've downloaded Samba 3.0.0rc4 and installed it. The
integration with Squid works fine(with NTLM). Now i would grant access
only those useres who are in a specific Windows Group. Where can i find
the helper, that allows this?
Thanks
Myrko Leitner
Hi !
Is there the need for a root account when using samba-3.0+ldap ?
I'm asking this because I cannot add XP workstations to the domain (I
made the registry changes), I get an access denied. Under NT, there's
no problem, it does not even ask for a login/password as long as the
workstation
Hi,
I am migrating from WinNT 4 to Samba 3 beta3 in a production
environment.
It would be nice to have some advice, because I don't know if Samba is
ready for assuming this ;-)
I never heard about any one that had something like this.
This is kind of a big network so it will be 1 PDC (Samba) , 4
Yes you must, use it to add workstation in domain. SambaSid =
siddom-1001 (uid=0 )
Jean-marc
-Message d'origine-
De :
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.org] De la part de Antoine Jacoutot
Envoyé : mardi 16 septembre 2003 13:49
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : [Samba] need of a
On Tue, 2003-09-16 at 21:54, Fernando Ribeiro wrote:
Hi,
I am migrating from WinNT 4 to Samba 3 beta3 in a production
environment.
It would be nice to have some advice, because I don't know if Samba is
ready for assuming this ;-)
I never heard about any one that had something like this.
On Tue, 2003-09-16 at 21:57, jean-marc pouchoulon wrote:
Yes you must, use it to add workstation in domain. SambaSid =
siddom-1001 (uid=0 )
That really should be -500, for 'administrator'. But otherwise, this
is quite correct.
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartlett
On Tue, 2003-09-16 at 11:38, Jim Mintha wrote:
I'm having a problem authenticating to Active Directory. I can join
the machine to the domain, wbinfo -g/-u will list the groups and users
and I can map a drive using: smbclient -k //s-lorentz.s-res.uva.nl/c\$
However when I try to get the linux
On Tue, 2003-09-16 at 05:24, Raymond wrote:
Utilizing Redhat 8.0. and the current SAMBA 2.x RPM.
Clients are Win2K and XP
Will be tunneling smb through ssh.
Would like to utilize port 445 and get away from UDP, LMHOSTS, and the like.
Please advise on how this can be accomplished with
I'm trying to compile Samba 2.2.8a with the --with-ldapsam flag on
Solaris 9 for x86 with latest Sun patches.
Running 'make' fails with the output below. I've checked all the
resources I can find online, but can't find what I'm doing wrong.
I have OpenLDAP installed and my LD_LIBRARY_PATH set
jean-marc pouchoulon wrote:
Yes you must, use it to add workstation in domain. SambaSid =
siddom-1001 (uid=0 )
Jean-marc
Well, I still get the same error message... :(
Acces denied... It is strange.
Why do we need login/passwd to add XP workstation to the samba domain,
can't I just tweak the
Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Tue, 2003-09-16 at 21:57, jean-marc pouchoulon wrote:
Yes you must, use it to add workstation in domain. SambaSid =
siddom-1001 (uid=0 )
That really should be -500, for 'administrator'. But otherwise, this
is quite correct.
What should be -500 ? The sambaSID ?
On Tue, 2003-09-16 at 22:14, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Tue, 2003-09-16 at 21:57, jean-marc pouchoulon wrote:
Yes you must, use it to add workstation in domain. SambaSid =
siddom-1001 (uid=0 )
That really should be -500, for 'administrator'. But
Hi,
And I can't find a solution for using account policy to block the user
account after bad logins, pdbedit doesn't seem to work.
I've just posted a patch concerning this functionnality on
samba-technical mailing list which can be fould here :
Andrew Bartlett wrote:
yes. Ie:
S-1-5-21-3798260358-3805881088-2864210895-500
Thanks a lot, it works now :)
But I still have one problem. When logging from Windows XP stations with
my username, I get the following error:
The procedure number is out of range.
Contact your administrator.
What
Anyone else use this? I can get the SAMBA 2.2.8 shares out now, I can even
mount them to a WIN2K3 server. Here's the weird part. I can drag and drop
from the share to the win box, but I can't run backups. I says I don't have
access. Any ideas where I should be looking first? I've opened up
How many levels are there, and what verbosity to they provide?
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Hi Jeremy,
First of all, thanks for your answer!
One more question:
Are there any old Samba version that can solve this Samba/DOS hash
incompatibility?
Are there any patch from Samba Server to solve this incompatibility?
Regards
Rodrigo N C Fernandes
Jeremy Allison wrote:
First, many thanks for all who have already help me.
I finally success to connect to a share from another computer after
searching a lot. Arg isn't this marvellous? ;-)
However, i succeed this while removing my account from the valid user in
the share declaration.
In the following example,
# Try to authenticate a user
% wbinfo -a [EMAIL PROTECTED]
plaintext password authentication failed
error code was NT_STATUS_NO_LOGON_SERVERS (0xc05e)
error messsage was: No logon servers
Could not authenticate user [EMAIL PROTECTED] with plaintext
password
challenge/response password
Sorry, there was a typo in my percedent mail on the second connect attempt:
What i tried :
wks01:/home# smbclient //172.26.123.121/myshare -U mylogon -W MYAD
Password:
smb: \ quit
wks01:/home# smbclient //172.26.123.121/secondshare -U mylogon -W MYAD
Password:
tree connect failed:
Hello!
Running the new Samba 3.0 with all users in an LDAP directory with the
new objectClass sambaSamAccount there seems to be a problem with
multiple domains.
I have some users that are in more than one domain. Previously this was
no problem, because all domains had access to the same LDAP user
On Tue, 2003-09-16 at 23:16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
# Try to authenticate a user
% wbinfo -a [EMAIL PROTECTED]
plaintext password authentication failed
error code was NT_STATUS_NO_LOGON_SERVERS (0xc05e)
error messsage was: No logon servers
Your message is No logon servers, and there
On Tue, 2003-09-16 at 23:48, Markus Schabel wrote:
Hello!
Running the new Samba 3.0 with all users in an LDAP directory with the
new objectClass sambaSamAccount there seems to be a problem with
multiple domains.
I have some users that are in more than one domain. Previously this was
no
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
Hi !
Is there the need for a root account when using samba-3.0+ldap ?
I'm asking this because I cannot add XP workstations to the domain (I
made the registry changes), I get an access denied. Under NT, there's
no problem, it does not even ask for
On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 12:05:44AM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Tue, 2003-09-16 at 23:16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
# Try to authenticate a user
% wbinfo -a [EMAIL PROTECTED]
plaintext password authentication failed
error code was NT_STATUS_NO_LOGON_SERVERS (0xc05e)
error
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, Fernando Ribeiro wrote:
Hi,
I am migrating from WinNT 4 to Samba 3 beta3 in a production
environment.
It would be nice to have some advice, because I don't know if Samba is
ready for assuming this ;-)
Samba has not been written to act as a psychiatrist - it does not
Hi !
I was just wondering if that piece of code was important (for security
and such), because I had to comment it in smbldap.c before compiling
samba-3.0; otherwise, I would have errors like:
(Insufficient access)smbldap_open: cannot access LDAP when not root
#ifndef NO_LDAP_SECURITY
On Mon, 2003-09-15 at 15:44, Michael Heironimus wrote:
On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 10:34:22AM -0500, Matt Schillinger wrote:
I have to admit that I don't see why you can't live live one PDC and X
BDCs. You would have construct your LDAP servers this way anyway. If a
PDC goes down (or the
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
jean-marc pouchoulon wrote:
Yes you must, use it to add workstation in domain. SambaSid =
siddom-1001 (uid=0 )
Jean-marc
Well, I still get the same error message... :(
Acces denied... It is strange.
Why do we need login/passwd to add XP
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, Potts, Ross A. wrote:
How many levels are there, and what verbosity to they provide?
Valid values are from 0 - 255.
We tend to use 1 - 10, and 100 for assenine level debugging alone.
For most things debug level 3 or 5 is sufficient, for nitty things 10.
- John T.
--
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, OPSC Service wrote:
Hi Jeremy,
First of all, thanks for your answer!
One more question:
Are there any old Samba version that can solve this Samba/DOS hash
incompatibility?
Are there any patch from Samba Server to solve this incompatibility?
Not that I
Hi again... :)
Is there a way to tell samba to automatically create and set a SID for
its domain if it does not have one ?
Because, after installing a samba PDC, I have to create a user for samba
to create the domain SID, and if I issue the command net getlocalsid
before creating a user, it
John H Terpstra wrote:
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
Hi !
Is there the need for a root account when using samba-3.0+ldap ?
I'm asking this because I cannot add XP workstations to the domain (I
made the registry changes), I get an access denied. Under NT, there's
no problem, it
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, Matt Schillinger wrote:
On Mon, 2003-09-15 at 15:44, Michael Heironimus wrote:
On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 10:34:22AM -0500, Matt Schillinger wrote:
I have to admit that I don't see why you can't live live one PDC and X
BDCs. You would have construct your LDAP servers
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, Markus Schabel wrote:
John H Terpstra wrote:
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
Hi !
Is there the need for a root account when using samba-3.0+ldap ?
I'm asking this because I cannot add XP workstations to the domain (I
made the registry changes), I get
We ran into a hanging smbfs now several times:
Client: Linux 2.4.18
Server: Solaris 8; running Samba 2.2.2
If the problem occurs we are not able to access or umount the filesystem any longer.
Is that a known bug I am not aware of or has anyone experienced something similar?
Thanks a lot,
Roman
Markus Schabel wrote:
Is this *really* needed if the machine accounts are stored in LDAP? For
writing /etc/passwd you need to be root, but for writing LDAP you
usually don't need to be root... You only need to have execute
permissions for the machine-add script...
As Andrew said, you have to be
John H Terpstra wrote:
As Andrew says, Try it, why ask? Let us know ow it goes.
OK, so here it goes:
- adding samba user root in LDAP SID-500 -- does NOT work
- adding posix user+samba user root in LDAP SID-500, uidNumber=0 -- WORKS
- adding posix user+samba user anyusername in LDAP SID-500,
Hi All,
I am using solaris9 x86 installed this packages and then installed
samba rc4 booms out with errors
libiconv-1.9.1
BerkeleyDB.4.1
openldap-stable-20030709
samba-3.0.0rc4
./configure --prefix=/data5/samba --with-libiconv=/usr/local/lib --with-krb5=/us
r/local/sbin --with-ldap
So, my question is: why do I have to create a posix user root since
my
system (/etc/passwd) already has one root ? I though just creating the
samba user would be enough...
samba reads backend nor /etc/passwd, isn't it ? So root can be
in /etc/passwd and he must be in a backend.
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, jean-marc pouchoulon wrote:
So, my question is: why do I have to create a posix user root since
my
system (/etc/passwd) already has one root ? I though just creating the
samba user would be enough...
samba reads backend nor /etc/passwd, isn't it ? So root can
John H Terpstra wrote:
In passdb backend, the account can be called root or Administrator.
If root is not called Administrator, then it is good policy to add in
smb.conf [globals]:
username map = /etc/samba/smbusers
Then in /etc/samba/smbusers:
root = Administrator
This effectively means that
Thanks! 255 sounds good; my wife says I can be pretty assenine.
;-)
-Original Message-
From: John H Terpstra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 10:31 AM
To: Potts, Ross A.
Cc: Samba (E-mail)
Subject: Re: [Samba] Debug levels
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, Potts, Ross A.
I've got a Samba 2.2.7a domain with an LDAP backend. It's been working for
nearly 3 months now without much bother.
By the way: Great work and thanks for all of the effort!
I have been missing one minor thing from the setup since I moved away from
NT 4: Password Expiration. In the past I have
Hello,
We have a Redhat 7.2 running as a Samba PDC for a long
time without any problem. All the client are Windows 2000
and WindowsXP. But now we have introduced Linux as
workstations and I want to use the same setting for
authenticating the Linux users (basically both systems
will use the
On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 10:02:18AM -0300, OPSC Service wrote:
Hi Jeremy,
First of all, thanks for your answer!
One more question:
Are there any old Samba version that can solve this Samba/DOS hash
incompatibility?
No. We always used a different hash.
Are there any patch
Hello,
I installed samba 3.0 RC4 on a sun 5.8. I compiled it fine.
When I run /usr/local/samba/bin/smbstatus, i have this message :
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/# /usr/local/samba/bin/smbstatus
Error trying to resolve symbol 'init_module' in /usr/local/samba/lib/charset/CP8
50.so: ld.so.1:
Hi,
You almost got it...
Samba 2 has a weird behaviour, when using LDAP and passwd program. When you
change the password from windows, thnings happen like this:
1) samba reads all the user data from LDAP to memory (doesn't read
userpassword)
2) executes the passwd program to change
Hi,
Well in samba 2.2.8 (in 2.2.4 wasnt) was passdb/pdb_ldap.c check like this:
/* check that the user is in the domain admin group for connecting */
if ( (uid != 0) !user_in_list(pass-pw_name,
lp_domain_admin_group()) ) {
DEBUG(0, (ldap_open_connection: cannot access
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 16 September 2003 21:34, Rauno Tuul wrote:
IMHO groupmapping doesnt fill that hole, because whatever groupmap entry
doesn't give admin rights on LDAP.
So, you think that's ok to remove that piece of code, right ?
Antoine
-BEGIN PGP
John H Terpstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 15 Sep 2003, Bruno Tobias Stella wrote:
Hi !
I'd like to know how does Samba delete files, because I need do
something to instead Samba removes files, it moves the deleted
files to another directory, like a Netware Salvage File or a
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, Bruno Tobias Stella wrote:
John H Terpstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 15 Sep 2003, Bruno Tobias Stella wrote:
Hi !
I'd like to know how does Samba delete files, because I need do
something to instead Samba removes files, it moves the deleted
files
-Original Message-
From: Antoine Jacoutot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tuesday 16 September 2003 21:34, Rauno Tuul wrote:
IMHO groupmapping doesnt fill that hole, because whatever groupmap entry
doesn't give admin rights on LDAP.
So, you think that's ok to remove that piece of code,
I can NOT have a W2KPro computer to reconnect to a RH9 Samba PDC server
domain after initial registration. (I don't have any problems with WXPPro)
NetBios name of the W2KPro computer: PRUEBA
RH9 PDC Samba domain name: SAMBA
When registering the W2KPro computer to the domain for the first time,
Hi all,
another French guy learning, don't bash me too hard... ;-)
In fact, I'm in need of a confirmation : I'm on the way to create a Samba3+LDAP
(new schemas) PDC server (no migration from NT4 nor 2K, only from an old Samba 2.0
with security=user using /etc/passwd, ie. no encrypt password).
This
Forgot to tell you I'm using Samba 2.2.8a
Regards
_
Ricardo Martinezgarza F.
ORIGINAL MESAGE:
I can NOT have a W2KPro computer to reconnect to a RH9 Samba PDC server
domain after initial registration. (I don't have any problems with WXPPro)
NetBios name of the W2KPro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 16 September 2003 22:25, Rauno Tuul wrote:
Honestly said, the parameter domain admin group should come back.
Some say it isn't necessary.
But how can you add PC's to domain with for example 2 users brick and
stone (different passwords),
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 16 September 2003 22:35, Jérôme Fenal wrote:
Hi all,
another French guy learning, don't bash me too hard... ;-)
T'inquiètes, ça fait 2 semaines que je suis dessus :)
In fact, I'm in need of a confirmation : I'm on the way to create a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rauno Tuul wrote:
|
| -Original Message-
| From: Antoine Jacoutot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
| On Tuesday 16 September 2003 21:34, Rauno Tuul wrote:
|
|IMHO groupmapping doesnt fill that hole, because whatever groupmap entry
|doesn't give
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 16 September 2003 23:02, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
|So, you think that's ok to remove that piece of code, right ?
|
| removing isn't the best solution, for security reasons. then can
anyone turn
| the LDAP to a mess...
Removing
On Wed, 2003-09-17 at 00:21, rom wrote:
I m working on a patch for samba 3.0, i ll soon finish it
do you do something like that cause i read that one of us work on bad
password lock ?
i find that samba need this function, the source for this function is
already present in samba 3.0 (part
Almost everyday my FreeBsd 4.8 machine with Samba from ports locks up
with
smb_maperror:Unmapped error 1:158
/kernel: :158
last message repeated 758 times
Machine has to be reset to get it back up and running. Any ideas?
Thanks,
Patrick
--
To unsubscribe from this
Hi,
I'm working on a testbed for a samba cluster. Should total 50 cpus
eventually. Would someone point me towards linux client benchmarking
programs? Anything I should know about tuning samba?
Thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Still having that problem with samba seemingly corrupting files, it seems to be the
same files that are corrupted again and again, yet they are corrupted differently and
sometimes not. I ran my md5 summer against one file ch02.pdf, and it almost
Hi Guys,
I experienced problems with Samba3.0rc4.
1. When I run command wbinfo, follow errors will be seen. It works fine when
CP850.so is deleted. ( While command 'net' will give warning without that
file )
wbinfo: error while loading shared libraries: /usr/lib/charset/CP850.so:
undefined
On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 07:04:48PM -0700, Steve Jr Ramage wrote:
Still having that problem with samba seemingly corrupting files,
This class of problems is usually caused by either by bad network
hardware or bad network drivers. Check the half/full duplex settings
on your switch or try
-Original Message-
From: Gerald (Jerry) Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|IMHO groupmapping doesnt fill that hole, because whatever
groupmap entry
|doesn't give admin rights on LDAP.
You're thinking about this from the wrong perspective.
The 'domain admin group' from 3.0 was a
Date: Tue Sep 16 06:33:16 2003
Author: jra
Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/libsmb
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv21878/libsmb
Modified Files:
Tag: SAMBA_3_0_RELEASE
trusts_util.c
Log Message:
Merge in obviously correct bugfix from Steve Langasek's patch for bug #450.
Date: Tue Sep 16 13:31:17 2003
Author: jelmer
Update of /home/cvs/samba/source/passdb
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv5988/passdb
Modified Files:
pdb_xml.c
Log Message:
Fix typo. Found by Aurelien Degremont
Revisions:
pdb_xml.c 1.9 = 1.10
Date: Tue Sep 16 13:31:41 2003
Author: jelmer
Update of /home/cvs/samba/source/passdb
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv6073/passdb
Modified Files:
Tag: SAMBA_3_0
pdb_xml.c
Log Message:
Fix typo. Found by Aurelien Degremont
Revisions:
pdb_xml.c 1.4.2.10 =
Date: Tue Sep 16 21:11:16 2003
Author: jerry
Update of /data/cvs/samba/packaging/Mandrake
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv24364
Modified Files:
Tag: SAMBA_3_0
samba2.spec.tmpl smb.conf winbind.init
Log Message:
packaging updates from Buchan
Revisions:
samba2.spec.tmpl
Date: Tue Sep 16 21:12:26 2003
Author: jerry
Update of /data/cvs/samba/packaging/Mandrake
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv24471
Modified Files:
Tag: SAMBA_3_0_RELEASE
samba2.spec.tmpl smb.conf winbind.init
Log Message:
packaging updates from Buchan
Revisions:
Date: Tue Sep 16 21:12:44 2003
Author: jerry
Update of /data/cvs/samba/packaging/Mandrake
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv24522
Modified Files:
samba2.spec.tmpl smb.conf winbind.init
Log Message:
packaging updates from Buchan
Revisions:
samba2.spec.tmpl1.9 =
89 matches
Mail list logo
