I have my Samba PDC running :-)
How do I administer groups from the samba box?
usrmgr.exe runs on the workstation but won't let me see groups
samba 3.0.14a-2 with tdbsam
TIA
Simon
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
Hai All,
how i can synchronise to samba share with out changing any Windows user or
group permission
i tried the following command.. but its keep only the master folder's
permission.. but not for al sub folders.
after synchronise, while i check rsync comand unable to synchronise with
the same
Sascha schrieb:
Hi list,
we are running a samba pdc version 3.0.20pre2-1 on
sles 8. we are using 2 vfs objects (vscan-clamav and
recycle). with vscan-clamav enabled the deleted files
on a samba share are not added to recycle directory.
When i remove the vscan entry the recycle object works
Olivier Houde schrieb:
Hi list
is there any way to specify on wich server a user's home is ? Let me
explain myself... I have a Samba3 PDC here at the head office using
LDAP as an authentication backend. We have offices in other cities and
we would like them to be on the same domain. All
Simon Faulkner wrote:
I have my Samba PDC running :-)
How do I administer groups from the samba box?
usrmgr.exe runs on the workstation but won't let me see groups
have you setup groupmapping?
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
paul kölle wrote:
Simon Faulkner wrote:
I have my Samba PDC running :-)
How do I administer groups from the samba box?
usrmgr.exe runs on the workstation but won't let me see groups
have you setup groupmapping?
Err, not sure! I used the vampire to get the details from the NT4 PDC
I am
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
updatemyself . schrieb:
Hai All,
how i can synchronise to samba share with out changing any Windows user or
group permission
i tried the following command.. but its keep only the master folder's
permission.. but not for al sub folders.
I am wondering where to look for groups etc!
Hmmm, it all seems to be done with net groupmap list
It's great, as you peer down into the murk you understand the next layer
and you realise there are many more layers of voodoo to go!
wish me luck...
Sim
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to
net groupmap list ntgroup=Domain Admins
Domain Admins (S-1-5-21-1065375514-2370838480-4047619883-512) - -1
Does this mean I have no group for Domain Admins?
Do I need to map them to root?
TIA
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
Why would I have some NT domains more than once?
Did I screp up my import with the Vampire?
Should I delete the unmapped ones (Gulp!)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# net groupmap list
System Operators (S-1-5-32-549) - -1
Replicator (S-1-5-32-552) - Replicator
Guests (S-1-5-32-546) - Guests
Recipe
Hello experts,
I've migrated our NT4 domain to sambe 3.0.20b/ldap backend with net rpc
vampire, and nearly everything works as expected. But one big problem
remains: it's not possible to login to the domains member maschines now,
because the domain is not available at the moment (translated
On Sat, 2005-11-12 at 13:28 +, Simon Faulkner wrote:
Why would I have some NT domains more than once?
Did I screp up my import with the Vampire?
Should I delete the unmapped ones (Gulp!)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# net groupmap list
System Operators (S-1-5-32-549) - -1
Replicator
On Sat, 2005-11-12 at 15:32 +0100, Christoph Peus wrote:
Hello experts,
I've migrated our NT4 domain to sambe 3.0.20b/ldap backend with net rpc
vampire, and nearly everything works as expected. But one big problem
remains: it's not possible to login to the domains member maschines now,
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005, Craig White wrote:
of course you can change the SID on the PDC but that isn't gonna work
for the computers that are already joined to the domain that still have
the old SID
ok, my thinking is if e.g. I would need to upgrade my Linux RH 9.0/samba
3.0.5-2 to e.g. FC4/samba
Christoph Peus wrote:
after net rpc vampire migration:
uidNumber: 22693
sambaSID: S-1-5-21-1139895982-289624505-398547282-4370
after the maschine rejoined the domain:
uidNumber: 22694
sambaSID: S-1-5-21-1139895982-289624505-398547282-46388
Hi Christoph, nice to read you :)
What shows
On Saturday 12 November 2005 06:28, Simon Faulkner wrote:
Why would I have some NT domains more than once?
Did I screp up my import with the Vampire?
Should I delete the unmapped ones (Gulp!)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# net groupmap list
System Operators (S-1-5-32-549) - -1
Replicator
I'm trying to setup samba 3 on FC4 to act a PDC and file server. I
created the smb.conf file like I always have in the past but I keep
getting this error.
/home/samba/netlogon' does not exist or is not a directory, when
connecting to [netlogon]
with relevant section from smb.conf [netlogon]
I cannot even start troubleshooting until I buy a clue. What does
Can't become connected user mean?
It shows up fairly often. Aside from happening when I try to access a
share, there's no pattern that I can see.
--
6 11:34:40 badlands smbd[20524]: [2005/11/06 11:34:40, 0]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Barry Johnson wrote:
| I'm trying to setup samba 3 on FC4 to act a PDC and file server. I
| created the smb.conf file like I always have in the past but I keep
| getting this error.
|
| /home/samba/netlogon' does not exist or is not a directory,
I did check the permissions of the directory and everything looks good.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] home]# ls -l
total 413528
drwxr-xr-x 2 baj baj 4096 Nov 12 10:35 baj
drwxrwxrwx 4 root root 4096 Nov 12 11:35 samba
It also isn't mounting my home dir on the windows xp
I've applied all the optimizations you mention in that URL in my own
smb.conf but my problem persists. The first user of the database
opens it very fast, but the next users that try to open it, do it very
slowly. Do you know what option (locking option?) might cause this
behaviour? I've also
Hi,
First, excuse me if this post is a bit offtopic, maybe this should be
posted in the debian-users maillist, but I just wanted to read your
experiences with this kind of setup, since I've migrated the server
to Debian Sarge using LDAP Backend to serve clients using WinXP and
Win98, and I've
FC4 Samba 3 joining Windows 2003 Domain.
I have to manually join the Domain after rebooting. If I set samba to
start when booting it doesn't join the domain. I have to smb stop, net
join ..., smb start from the command line and then it will join the
domain and work fine. Is there something in
We're into our new server build. We have built Samba / LDAP servers
before, but never a PDC. I'm not sure that this question is
PDC-specific though.
What is the difference between smbldap-useradd, and adding a user to the
LDAP database normally e.g. with cpu useradd?
Are smbldap-tools needed
On Sat, 2005-11-12 at 15:48 +, Simon Faulkner wrote:
Craig White wrote:
On Sat, 2005-11-12 at 13:28 +, Simon Faulkner wrote:
Why would I have some NT domains more than once?
Did I screp up my import with the Vampire?
Should I delete the unmapped ones (Gulp!)
[EMAIL
This follows on from the previous questions. I noticed that
smbldap-tools With lines like
ldap user suffix = ou=Users
in smb.conf, should we change Users to People if that's how our LDAP
database was set up, or do Users and People generally mean different
things in LDAP?
--
To unsubscribe from
On Sat, 2005-11-12 at 12:35 -0500, Jorge Santiago wrote:
Hi,
First, excuse me if this post is a bit offtopic, maybe this should be
posted in the debian-users maillist, but I just wanted to read your
experiences with this kind of setup, since I've migrated the server
to Debian Sarge using
On Sat, 2005-11-12 at 18:56 +, Antony Gelberg wrote:
This follows on from the previous questions. I noticed that
smbldap-tools With lines like
ldap user suffix = ou=Users
in smb.conf, should we change Users to People if that's how our LDAP
database was set up, or do Users and People
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
==
I'm a great big boot in a world of toes.
-- David Mullen
On Nov 10, 2005, at 4:58 AM, Michael Lueck wrote:
Michael Lueck wrote:
So close to working that this is annoying. Upon looking into the
Windows DHCP client, one can request specific DHCP options be
mapped to specific places in the registry, so I cooked up the
following:
REGEDIT4
I have /etc/auto.master and /etc/auto.smb such that
ls /smb/name of system
works for the two Win98 machines on my network (the machines get
automatically mounted and the directory contains C). When I try the same
command on the Windows XP machine, I get
No such file or directory
The
On Sat, 2005-11-12 at 15:49 -0700, Jeffrey Barish wrote:
I have /etc/auto.master and /etc/auto.smb such that
ls /smb/name of system
works for the two Win98 machines on my network (the machines get
automatically mounted and the directory contains C). When I try the same
command on the
Howdy y'all, I have a new partition, /dev/hdc1 that's ext3 formatted.
# mkfs.ext3 -L /backup /dev/hdc1
Then added it to /etc/fstab
LABEL=/backup /backup ext3defaults1 2
As you can see I'm mounting the file system into directory /backup
My smb.conf file has
On Sat, 2005-11-12 at 17:33 -0600, Mike Hanby wrote:
Howdy y'all, I have a new partition, /dev/hdc1 that's ext3 formatted.
# mkfs.ext3 -L /backup /dev/hdc1
Then added it to /etc/fstab
LABEL=/backup /backup ext3defaults1 2
As you can see I'm mounting
On Sat, 2005-11-12 at 16:42 -0700, Craig White wrote:
On Sat, 2005-11-12 at 17:33 -0600, Mike Hanby wrote:
Howdy y'all, I have a new partition, /dev/hdc1 that's ext3 formatted.
# mkfs.ext3 -L /backup /dev/hdc1
Then added it to /etc/fstab
LABEL=/backup /backup
Craig White wrote:
On Sat, 2005-11-12 at 15:49 -0700, Jeffrey Barish wrote:
I have /etc/auto.master and /etc/auto.smb such that
ls /smb/name of system
works for the two Win98 machines on my network (the machines get
automatically mounted and the directory contains C). When I try the
On Sat, 2005-11-12 at 16:57 -0700, Jeffrey Barish wrote:
Craig White wrote:
If everyone gets those shares, then how does everyone get auto.smb to work?
Do they replace the standard auto.smb with one that filters out entries for
things that are listed as disks but are not? And does
Howdy, the path statement in the smb.conf file is using Unix pathing.
path = /backup
I tried adding the guest only = yes to the [netfiles] section and it
didn't change anything.
Here's my [netfiles] section again:
[netfiles]
comment = Network file storage space
path = /backup
read only
On Sat, 2005-11-12 at 20:44 -0600, Mike Hanby wrote:
Howdy, the path statement in the smb.conf file is using Unix pathing.
path = /backup
I tried adding the guest only = yes to the [netfiles] section and it
didn't change anything.
Here's my [netfiles] section again:
[netfiles]
I am a newbie to linux. I'm trying to learn everything at once. I chose debian
as my weapon of self destruction. Recently I installed the debian version of
Samba 3.0.20 for x86. It seems to be up and running. I can see it from my
windows xp and win 98 machines which are on the same LAN, and
It's ext3 (In the original post I included the make file system command):
# mkfs.ext3 -L /backup /dev/hdc1
If I do an ls -ld /backup before mounting and after mounting, the
permissions look the same to me, obviously I'm missing something but I can't
find it!
-Original Message-
From:
Couple of corrections to my previous post.
1. My Samba version is 3.0.14a-Debian not 3.0.20
2. It's on i386 not x86, whatever that is.
Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
it does appear that there is a problem with your setup. At this point
you should try a tdbdump of your tdb passdb to see what it looks like
and if it is garbage, delete it and start all over. If it looks good,
you can net setlocalsid and it should take but the results of the other
commands I
set delivery off
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Author: tridge
Date: 2005-11-12 08:18:52 + (Sat, 12 Nov 2005)
New Revision: 11698
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=11698
Log:
added some more level names
Modified:
branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/libcli/smb2/smb2_calls.h
Changeset:
Modified:
Author: tridge
Date: 2005-11-12 08:19:39 + (Sat, 12 Nov 2005)
New Revision: 11699
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=11699
Log:
use create_complex_file() to setup a file with a wide range of
different attributes before running the getinfo level
Author: tridge
Date: 2005-11-12 08:39:36 + (Sat, 12 Nov 2005)
New Revision: 11700
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=11700
Log:
added structure definitions for many of the getinfo structures
Modified:
Author: jerry
Date: 2005-11-12 16:26:57 + (Sat, 12 Nov 2005)
New Revision: 852
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=samba-webrev=852
Log:
announcing 3.0.21rc1
Modified:
trunk/index.html
Changeset:
Modified: trunk/index.html
Author: jerry
Date: 2005-11-12 16:28:54 + (Sat, 12 Nov 2005)
New Revision: 853
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=samba-webrev=853
Log:
fixing typos and broken links
Modified:
trunk/index.html
Changeset:
Modified: trunk/index.html
Author: jerry
Date: 2005-11-12 16:29:59 + (Sat, 12 Nov 2005)
New Revision: 854
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=samba-webrev=854
Log:
doh!one more broken link
Modified:
trunk/index.html
Changeset:
Modified: trunk/index.html
Author: jerry
Date: 2005-11-12 16:53:14 + (Sat, 12 Nov 2005)
New Revision: 11701
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=11701
Log:
tagging 3.0.21rc1
Added:
tags/re/
Changeset:
Copied: tags/re (from rev 11700, branches/SAMBA_3_0_RELEASE)
Author: jerry
Date: 2005-11-12 16:54:11 + (Sat, 12 Nov 2005)
New Revision: 11703
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=11703
Log:
bad tag (cut-n-paste error)
Removed:
tags/re/
Changeset:
Author: vlendec
Date: 2005-11-12 18:22:12 + (Sat, 12 Nov 2005)
New Revision: 11704
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=11704
Log:
methods-alternate_name is not used anymore -- remove it
Modified:
branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/nsswitch/winbindd.h
Author: deryck
Date: 2005-11-12 20:45:13 + (Sat, 12 Nov 2005)
New Revision: 855
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=samba-webrev=855
Log:
Add news item on 3.0.21rc1 release.
Move older release announcements to history.
Update release links and release note
Author: mimir
Date: 2005-11-12 21:44:42 + (Sat, 12 Nov 2005)
New Revision: 11705
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=11705
Log:
Fix segfaulting create user function.
rafal
Modified:
branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/libnet/libnet_user.c
Changeset:
URL: http://build.samba.org/
--- /home/build/master/cache/broken_results.txt.old 2005-11-12
00:00:12.0 +
+++ /home/build/master/cache/broken_results.txt 2005-11-13 00:00:10.0
+
@@ -1,17 +1,17 @@
-Build status as of Sat Nov 12 00:00:01 2005
+Build status as of Sun Nov
56 matches
Mail list logo
