On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 11:48:42PM +0200, xavier wrote:
> I've tried this day to put veto oplocks in (global) section onto .DAT
> and .POL files
> and into netlogon and profiles section I've put : "locking = No"
> seems better in my logs now.
locking=no is not a good idea for general use, this mi
"EHines" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I eventually cleared the problem by rebooting the Samba
server--everything is running properly, now. However, rebooting seems
excessive. In future, what sorts of things typically go wrong to produce
this type of failure? For what
it seems to be that the path \home\staff\fran is invalid
on the target server. Can you verify that the full
directory path does in fact exist ?
Yep, it is definitely there. I have also made a significant new
discovery, the older smbclient 3.0.1 can do the operation no problem:
[EMAIL PROT
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 04:25:50PM -0400, Simon Renshaw wrote:
> OK, I'll try to upgrade it.
>
> I just downloaded MIT Kerberos 1.4.3.
>
> I ran rpm -qa|grep krb and got:
>
> krb5-server-1.3.4-27
> krb5-auth-dialog-0.2-1
> krb5-libs-1.3.4-27
> krbafs-1.2.2-6
> krb5-devel-1.3.4-27
> krbafs-devel-
On Fri, 2006-04-14 at 13:38 -0700, jasmine mary wrote:
> Thank u Jelmer ..It started to compile once i updated with the new release of
> GCC(3.4.2). But still it is giving errors. Please help me out of this.
> Compiling heimdal/lib/vers/print_version.c with host compiler
> In file included from h
Absolutely! Checking it out and building now.
news ASAP.
Thanks alot,
Greg
On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 11:20 -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 01:05:43PM -0400, Greg Dickie wrote:
> >
> > Hey Jeremy,
> >
> > I think that just means 3 runs 1 reads, 1 writes and one 50-50. I
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Fran Fabrizio wrote:
> dos_clean_name [\home\staff\fran\2005 LRF\2004 LRF Summary FINAL.doc]
> NT_STATUS_OBJECT_PATH_NOT_FOUND opening remote file
> \home\staff\fran\2005 LRF\2004 LRF Summary FINAL.doc
> (\home\staff\fran\2005 LRF\)
it seems to be th
hi,
My NTconfig.pol file into \\netlogon share seems to be good...
in the logs the file is readed with no problem at my user logon.
The strange think I have is that the policy I've made is applied if my
user loggon onto a windows 2003 server we have for testing purpose ! (If
I loggon first onto
Thanks Volker,
I've tried this day to put veto oplocks in (global) section onto .DAT
and .POL files
and into netlogon and profiles section I've put : "locking = No"
seems better in my logs now.
I just still have antothers little pb. that I will post a mail in this
list next to this one.
Xavi
OK, I'll try to upgrade it.
I just downloaded MIT Kerberos 1.4.3.
I ran rpm -qa|grep krb and got:
krb5-server-1.3.4-27
krb5-auth-dialog-0.2-1
krb5-libs-1.3.4-27
krbafs-1.2.2-6
krb5-devel-1.3.4-27
krbafs-devel-1.2.2-6
krbafs-utils-1.2.2-6
krb5-workstation-1.3.4-27
pam_krb5-2.1.8-1
Should I unins
I've got several dozen Windows XP Pro computers in a Samba/Windows
Domain. The problem is that with them being in the domain, automatic
updates does not work on these computers. I think its because the
people log into the computers with the default windows domain
restrictions (you know, can't
Are the directories in \\dapper\dfs in fact dfs
referrals?
Everything under \\dapper\dfs is all part of the same shared folder,
which is F:\dfs on dapper. My deep knowledge of dfs is lacking, but our
dfs setup is very simple - just one share in fact (so dfs probably
overkill, but the previ
Hi - I'm having some problems with network browsing using a Samba PDC
(3.0.22) and I'd appreciate any hints that might push me in the right
direction. One of the problems is that I am on a very crowded subnet
that is being used by several different groups. There are a two
separate WinNT/200
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 03:14:02PM -0400, Simon Renshaw wrote:
> Hi,
>
> An update on my work to integrate my Linux server (CentOS 4.3) in AD
> 2003.
>
> Sorry about the long post :)
>
> Found this page
> (http://www.enterprisenetworkingplanet.com/netos/article.php/3487081)
> and followed the in
Hi,
An update on my work to integrate my Linux server (CentOS 4.3) in AD
2003.
Sorry about the long post :)
Found this page
(http://www.enterprisenetworkingplanet.com/netos/article.php/3487081)
and followed the instructions on it.
First, I made sure that the Samba installation is supporting Ker
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 01:05:43PM -0400, Greg Dickie wrote:
>
> Hey Jeremy,
>
> I think that just means 3 runs 1 reads, 1 writes and one 50-50. I
> could have sworn I sent the config file already but here it is again
> along with the binaries.
>
> Thanks alot,
> Greg
Greg - is it possible fo
Hello, I am having trouble joining Samba to my ADS domain. I am using Samba
3 and krb5. I have configured and tested krb5 and know that it is
functioning as it should be. I can successfully authenticate users using
kinit. I've also configured winbindd. When I exicute net ads joing -U and enter the
I will be out of the office starting 18/04/2006 and will not return until
24/04/2006.
Ik antwoord op uw bericht wanneer ik terug ben.
Voor dringende zaken kunt u contact opnemen met:
I will respond to your message when I’m back from holiday.
For imported things you can contact:
Paul de Brui
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sbin]# ./smbldap-useradd -m -a test20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sbin]# pdbedit -Lv test20
Unix username:test20
NT username: test20
Account Flags:[UX ]
Perhaps is because that new account is disabled? (without password?)
Pablo
--
Tel: +57 (2) 7314752/3
Thanks, now it works. I have made a comment at only_from 127.0.0.1 and I
have used the ";". That does not work. Now I have used the "#" and it's o.k.
Jerry Westrick wrote:
Check the following:
1) in the file /etc/xinetd.d/swat make sure the there is no restriction
to localhost (only_from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Fran Fabrizio wrote:
>
> [For those on both this and samba-technical - sorry for the duplication.
> I meant to send this here, but I experienced a user error. :-) ]
>
> I'm having a problem related to the NT_STATUS_OBJECT_PATH_NOT_FOUND
> error and
I was hoping to switch from nfs to cifs on my linux systems to get away from
the need to sync uid/gid. I am surprised to find:
uid=arg
sets the uid that will own all files on the mounted filesystem. It may be
specified as either a username or a numeric uid. This parameter is ignored
when the tar
Hello
I have Samba running as AD member. In addition there is a support of
quest user connections to shares, that allow guest connections to
shares, where access is restricted on IP addresses base.
Problem is, that Administrator is not mapped to guest, because
Administrator in AD domain is locke
Jeremy Allison wrote:
I got a message from the organizer, for the
first time the video feed of the Golden Penguin
Bowl is available
So if you never saw me making a complete fool
of myself live, now's your chance to see it
second hand :-) :-).
John Mark Walker wrote :
Hey ho... so the G
24 matches
Mail list logo
