I have a number of linux hosts (4+) that I wish to mount from a a common
server. Currently we are using MSW2003R2 as a domain controller and are
using Active Directory for centralised authentication. I was planning
on using the inbuilt NFS server to server unix home directories across
all
Hello,
although this should not occur on W2k client machines, please take a
look at the Windows XP SP2 slow printing solution thread.
http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2004-November/096146.html
and http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2004-November/096492.html
The symptoms are the same
Hi
I have samba 3.0.14a (debian/stable) and wonder where the problem is
that running this command:
# net groupmap add ntgroup=Domain Admins unixgroup=ntadmins rid=512
type=d
gives:
adding entry for group Domain Admins failed!
but (note changed rid)
# net groupmap add ntgroup=Domain Admins
Scott Armstrong wrote:
First thing - I'd like to say a big THANK YOU to the developers.
I just upgraded to samba-3.0.23 and I've noticed an alarming issue with
respect to my configuration.
I've been using the built-in keytab management and it looks like the updated
code no longer creates the
Hi Piotr
I had all these problems too... and posted here, but no solution. The only
solution I found was to delete the group/user entirely, and specify the RID
at the same time as you create the group/user. It's ok then. However, once
I had the error (although the RID changed), I had a
Dear List Members
We are currently using samba-3.0.10-1.4E.2-x86_64 on RedHat AS 4. And
it seems that we are suffering of the same problems reported here:
http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2005-April/104335.html
problems with the service pack 1 for windows 2003
[2005/04/25 02:06:33,
I found a bug in nsswitch/pam_winbind.c which I reported to
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3916
I submitted shortly a patch which solves the issue.
In _pam_parse (pam_winbind.c) there are two for statements which consume the
parameters argc and argv. The first loop decrements argc
Martin Zielinski writes:
although this should not occur on W2k client machines, please take a
look at the Windows XP SP2 slow printing solution thread.
http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2004-November/096146.html
and http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2004-November/096492.html
The
On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 09:04:22AM -0700, M. D. Parker wrote:
Ok...ok...I'll appologize to the everybody. And yes I do understand that
bugs unreported cannot be fixed, but on a 'beta' you cannot be very sure
that maybe what you built was not quite right. I remember this because I
tried one
Hi all,
Are these still the best ways to automate software installs and
updates via a Samba/LDAP Domain?
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=sambam=111598734205575w=2
Thanks,
Paul.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
Hi List,
One particular user is kicked quite often (espescially during the usage
of Outlook). When she tries to login she isn't very succesfull. The
serverlog show this:
Jul 13 10:41:14 server smbd[12277]: [2006/07/13 10:41:14, 0]
lib/util_sock.c:write_data(554)
Jul 13 10:41:14 server
zdennis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jamrock,
Thanks for your reply. I just got my windows xp client to join the domain.
After some alterations that Robert had me make in
another thread, I believe that fixed my samba
Hello: I'm away on holidays right now!
If this is an Urgent ticket please submit a repair ticket
herehttp://ts.sd57.bc.ca
I will be checking my mail still every few days
Or Page #613-4732
Thanks
Benny.nerd
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
Piotr Legiecki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi
I have samba 3.0.14a (debian/stable) and wonder where the problem is
that running this command:
# net groupmap add ntgroup=Domain Admins unixgroup=ntadmins rid=512
type=d
gives:
adding entry for group Domain
we use http://www.wpkg.org
i would suggest you check it out.
Paul Henry wrote:
Hi all,
Are these still the best ways to automate software installs and
updates via a Samba/LDAP Domain?
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=sambam=111598734205575w=2
Thanks,
Paul.
--
To unsubscribe from this list
we use http://www.wpkg.org
i would suggest you check it out.
Excellent! Thanks.
Paul Henry wrote:
Hi all,
Are these still the best ways to automate software installs and
updates via a Samba/LDAP Domain?
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=sambam=111598734205575w=2
Thanks,
Paul.
--
Hello List,
is there any documentation of pam_winbind.conf for pam_winbind.so in
samba-3.0.23.
Especially what value is necessary for krb5_ccache_type to create a
ticket file for the user in /tmp?
Thank you for your help.
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Dietrich Streifert
Visionet GmbH
--
To
Hi,
Brief history:
Ive got a domain controller with domain logons, users and
passwords are kept in a normal smbpasswd file.
Normally users can log in, but only those, who previously could
log in to the domain.
New users cannot log to domain on the client machines.
Hello,
I have a minor problem wherein Samba is creating roaming profiles for users
who logon to our lab's domain. I don't want roaming profiles. Since I'm
not using the logon path command in my smb.conf, and I don't have a
[profile] share in my smb.conf either, I cant' figure out why Samba
On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 11:44:05AM +0200, Marc Petitmermet wrote:
I was wondering if samba-3.0.10-1.4E.6-x86_64, which is now available
through the RedHat Network channel, includes the necessary patches or
not.
This is something which you should ask RedHat.
Volker
pgpxKTm2Z7RXd.pgp
On Wed, 12 Jul 2006 18:53:56 -0300
Ethy H. Brito [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi again
Can anyone help me with this, please?
Any doc, FAQ, whatever? I am not afraid reading these.
Google was not my friend this time (or maybe I did not know how to ask).
Regards
Ethy
Hi all
I trying to sync
Hi,
I am in the process of upgrading from v3.0.20a to v3.0.23 with our
local passdb plugin. The plugin complies without any issues.
Our User DataBase contains all our users accounts but not system
accounts. With Samba v3.0.20a this wasn't a problem.
Why th change between v3.0.20a and v3.0.23 ?
CentOS4 RPMS for x86-64 would be awesome.
---
Tony Hoover, Network Administrator
KSU - Salina, College of Technology and Aviation
(785) 826-2660
Don't Blend in...
On Thu, 2006-07-13 at 10:40 -0400, Eric Evans wrote:
Hello,
I have a minor problem wherein Samba is creating roaming profiles for users
who logon to our lab's domain. I don't want roaming profiles. Since I'm
not using the logon path command in my smb.conf, and I don't have a
[profile]
I am subscribed to another list for the Exim MTA.
I have been experiencing a similar problem to it for quite a long time.
I believe the patch supplied by Alain Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
his discussion on the list mail could be quote relevant to Samba.
Here is the start of the thread.
Serious apologies if this has been discussed before, but my search
didn't turn up much:
I have samba (kept up-to-date with latest) running on several CentOS 3
and 4 boxes as part of a Win2k3 domain. On one particular box,
winbind dies on a regular basis (all the other installations run
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
M. D. Parker wrote:
Just for the record, I did find a workaround that
seemed to work after looking at the debug files a
little more closely.
In the smbusers file (mapping account names to local
names), I put in the line
DOMAIN\user =
Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
o Winbind IDMAP integration with RFC2307 schema objects supported
by Windows 2003 R2.
Is there any documentation on this feature. I currently use Sun's ISW
sync to sync my LDAP source with my ADS source outside of the scope of
Samba. So my all my users
On Thu, 2006-07-13 at 12:14 -0300, Ethy H. Brito wrote:
On Wed, 12 Jul 2006 18:53:56 -0300
Ethy H. Brito [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi again
Can anyone help me with this, please?
Any doc, FAQ, whatever? I am not afraid reading these.
Google was not my friend this time (or maybe I did not
Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
o Winbind IDMAP integration with RFC2307 schema objects supported
by Windows 2003 R2.
Is there any documentation on this feature. I currently use Sun's ISW
sync to sync my LDAP source with my ADS source outside of the scope of
Samba. So my all my users
Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
o Winbind IDMAP integration with RFC2307 schema objects supported
by Windows 2003 R2.
Is there any documentation on this feature. I currently use Sun's ISW
sync to sync my LDAP source with my ADS source outside of the scope of
Samba. So my all my users
Dietrich Streifert wrote:
I found a bug in nsswitch/pam_winbind.c which I reported to
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3916
I submitted shortly a patch which solves the issue.
I can confirm that patch works as advertised, and fixes the issue for me.
Many thanks Dietrich.
-- Rex
Following up again to see if anyone can point me in the right direction.
Thanks,
Toan
Ngo, Toan wrote:
Winbind appears to lose connections every once in a while.
Is there a way to tell which Domain Controller winbind is making
connections to? I have 3 DCs currently and trying to track down
On Thu, 13 Jul 2006, Dimitri Yioulos wrote:
Serious apologies if this has been discussed before, but my search
didn't turn up much:
just so you dont feel like you're the only one. my winbind also crashes
quite regularly
Not that it is the right thing to do but, I have set up a cron job to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Basso Stefano wrote:
Hello,
I upgrade SAMBA from 3.0.22 to 3.0.23 release
Samba version 3.0.22-0.1.10-SUSE-SL10.0
-rwxrwx---+ 1 test Domain Users 1150816 Apr 19 20:14 snap.bmp
-rwxrwx---+ 1 test Domain Users654096 Apr 19 20:29
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 11:28:29AM -0400, Dimitri Yioulos wrote:
Serious apologies if this has been discussed before, but my search
didn't turn up much:
I have samba (kept up-to-date with latest) running on several CentOS 3
and 4 boxes as part of a Win2k3 domain. On one particular
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 03:39:33PM +0200, Dietrich Streifert wrote:
Hello List,
is there any documentation of pam_winbind.conf for pam_winbind.so in
samba-3.0.23.
Currently not, I should write a manpage for that though.
Especially what value is necessary for krb5_ccache_type to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rex Dieter wrote:
Dietrich Streifert wrote:
I found a bug in nsswitch/pam_winbind.c which I reported to
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3916
I submitted shortly a patch which solves the issue.
I can confirm that patch works as
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
My windows xp clients do not have the groups Domain Users, Domain Groups,
Domain Admins, etc... Are they supposed to have those
groups?
My windows xp laptop has joined my domain, but I cannot login (even though my
LDAP backend is getting queried
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dimitri Yioulos wrote:
Serious apologies if this has been discussed before,
but my search didn't turn up much:
I have samba (kept up-to-date with latest) running on
several CentOS 3 and 4 boxes as part of a Win2k3
domain. On one particular
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ngo, Toan wrote:
Following up again to see if anyone can point me in
the right direction.
netstat.
jerry
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
I was doing a netstat and grepping for winbind so I missed the entry.
Thanks.
Toan
-Original Message-
From: Gerald (Jerry) Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2006 9:40 AM
To: Ngo, Toan
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [SAMBA] winbind: how can I tell which DC
It looks like the latest release does work. Thanks for the help guys!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Trimble, Ronald D
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 3:49 PM
To: Gerald (Jerry) Carter
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul Griffith wrote:
Hi,
I am in the process of upgrading from v3.0.20a to
v3.0.23 with our local passdb plugin. The plugin
complies without any issues.
Have up dated your code? The passdb interface has
modified pretty heavily for 3.0.23.
On Thursday July 13 2006 12:28 pm, you wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 11:28:29AM -0400, Dimitri Yioulos wrote:
Serious apologies if this has been discussed before, but my
search didn't turn up much:
I have samba (kept up-to-date with latest) running on several
CentOS 3 and 4 boxes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Trimble, Ronald D wrote:
It looks like the latest release does work. Thanks
for the help guys!
:-) Great! One less bug :-)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE -
On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 01:01:27PM +0200, Volker Lendecke wrote:
The attached patch adds the S-1-22-1-uid to the user's
token. It is a bit larger than strictly necessary, but the
minimum diff size would have made the code a bit clumsy.
I think the patch was removed, or you forgot to attach it.
Dear all,
Hi. I'm a Samba user from Taiwan. I'm running Samba 3.0.23,
Debian GNU/Linux 3.1r2, Linux kernel 2.6.16.14, gcc 3.4.4. I encounter
the following strange message when using smbmount:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/tmp % smbmount //cotton/share ~/tmp/cotton
added interface ip=192.168.0.1
Upgrading krb5 seems to solve the problem. No more errors and wbinfo
does not seg fault winbind.
krb-1.5.1
Toan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ngo,
Toan
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 1:58 PM
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: RE:
Hi,
During testing I discovered something interesting with different mount
methods. This is the environment:
PDC = RedHat rhel4, 2.6.9-34.0.2ELsmp kernel, samba version 3.0.10-1.4E.6
Client = SuSE sles9, 2.6.5-7244-smp kernel, samba version 3.0.20b-3.4-SUSE
I have a share (shareB) with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Doug,
File a bug report if you believe this to be true. I'm
not at 3.0.23 right now and don't have the time to try it
here. I wouldn't want to lose this. I did see a mention
they dropped support of joins from machines where
the domain differs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/13/2006 01:27 PM, Andreas Hasenack escreveu:
On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 01:01:27PM +0200, Volker Lendecke wrote:
The attached patch adds the S-1-22-1-uid to the user's
token. It is a bit larger than strictly necessary, but the
minimum diff size
On Thursday July 13 2006 12:39 pm, you wrote:
Dimitri Yioulos wrote:
Serious apologies if this has been discussed before,
but my search didn't turn up much:
I have samba (kept up-to-date with latest) running on
several CentOS 3 and 4 boxes as part of a Win2k3
domain. On one
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alan Munter wrote:
I just patched our domain controllers with MS06-035
because it said it was just fixing a couple of memory
leak problems with SMB in srvsvc.
Now, this afternoon, one of my colleagues tried to
join a FC5 machine to our
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Felipe Augusto van de Wiel wrote:
On 07/13/2006 01:27 PM, Andreas Hasenack escreveu:
On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 01:01:27PM +0200, Volker Lendecke wrote:
The attached patch adds the S-1-22-1-uid to the user's
token. It is a bit larger than strictly
On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 12:53:19PM +0200, Thijs Hakkenberg wrote:
Hi List,
One particular user is kicked quite often (espescially during the usage
of Outlook). When she tries to login she isn't very succesfull. The
serverlog show this:
Jul 13 10:41:14 server smbd[12277]: [2006/07/13
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Don Meyer wrote:
Were it up to me, I'd post the RPMs for RHEL with
a prominent disclaimer on the support issue. (But
then I'd probably want to separate builds
for RHEL3/RHEL4...) Many people aren't aware of
the improved ability to build
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Scott Armstrong wrote:
I've been using the built-in keytab management and it looks
like the updated code no longer creates the userPrincipal
in Active Directory.
I'm still working on the keytab code. There will be more
updates. Sorry I couldn't
On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 02:43:31PM -0300, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/13/2006 01:27 PM, Andreas Hasenack escreveu:
On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 01:01:27PM +0200, Volker Lendecke wrote:
The attached patch adds the S-1-22-1-uid to the
Hello: I'm away on holidays right now!
If this is an Urgent ticket please submit a repair ticket
herehttp://ts.sd57.bc.ca
I will be checking my mail still every few days
Or Page #613-4732
Thanks
Benny.nerd
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Scott Armstrong wrote:
Things still worked fine for existing domain members.
I only noticed it because I added a new system to
the domain. Lines 962-964 of utils/net_ads.c have
comments about the upn but it's never being added.
I rarely program
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andreas Hasenack wrote:
I got the following patch (inline) attached from Volker's
original message, hope it helps. Kind regards,
Thanks
I think there is a new one, though:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
M. D. Parker wrote:
No I really mean DOMAIN\user = user
I guess that makes sense... clever. Hmmm
jerry
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 01:49:46PM -0500, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andreas Hasenack wrote:
I got the following patch (inline) attached from Volker's
original message, hope it helps. Kind regards,
Thanks
I think there is a
Hello!
My company makes testing software that, among other things, can be used
to generate file-system traffic. In order to better support Samba, I need
to make a few changes to the way samba mounts file systems:
1) I need to be able to specify the local IP address for the socket connection.
At 01:15 PM 7/13/2006, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Don Meyer wrote:
Were it up to me, I'd post the RPMs for RHEL with
a prominent disclaimer on the support issue. (But
then I'd probably want to separate builds
for RHEL3/RHEL4...) Many
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ok, Here is my samba log. Authentication succeeds but my user still gets The
system could not log you on. Make sure your User
name and domain are correct... Any ideas?
[2006/07/13 15:56:06, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(1194)
Transaction 40 of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Scott Armstrong wrote:
And why can't you use 'kinit -k machine$'?
I probably could do that but I had been trying to keep
things as close to the way I had been creating machine
principals when using an MIT KDC - host/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The
Paul Henry skrev:
Hi all,
Are these still the best ways to automate software installs and
updates via a Samba/LDAP Domain?
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=sambam=111598734205575w=2
Thanks,
Paul.
you can try altiris too
http://www.altiris.com/
--
Venlig Hilsen (Best Regards)
Rune Tønnesen
On Thu, 13 Jul 2006 10:18:13 -0500
Adam Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ls -l /tmp/teset results in what? mayve you should comment that out and
uncomment the /ur/bin/passwd %u line.
Mr. Willians
Thank you for your time.
As I said earlier, 'passwd program' is not called!
But answering
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Scott Armstrong wrote:
Or I could add a switch to 'net ads join' that said
create the UPN. I don't really want to make it
default behavior. Would that be acceptable?
That would be fine although if you can allow the format
of the hostname to
zdennis wrote:
Ok, Here is my samba log. Authentication succeeds but my user still
gets The system could not log you on. Make sure your User
name and domain are correct... Any ideas?
same problem here..
--
Regards,
Dariusz Dwornikowski Network Administrator
Cognifide Poland
--
Ethy H. Brito (by way of Ethy H. Brito [EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Thu, 13 Jul 2006 10:18:13 -0500
Adam Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ls -l /tmp/teset results in what? mayve you should comment that out and
uncomment the /ur/bin/passwd %u line.
Mr. Willians
Thank you for your
Hello,
I've seen other folks posting with this problem, but I think my issue is a
bit different (thus the super long subject).
The environment is Solaris 9 09/05, running Samba 3.0.22/Sun DS 5.2/idealx
scripts 0.9.1, but I can translate openldap/linux/samba-ese if you think of
a solution that
Hello,
I'm using SaMBa to share homedirs of a linux server. Since version
3.0.23, when i try to reach the home dir of a user that have the
server's name i have this error:
auth/auth_util.c:create_token_from_username(1059)
[user_name_here] is a Domain, not a user
This happens only with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ben Greear wrote:
While working on adding support for local-binding, I found this piece of
code
in libmsrpc.c. Maybe I'm confused..but should that strcmp maybe be
compared to != 0?
/*change the server name in the server handle if
Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ben Greear wrote:
While working on adding support for local-binding, I found this piece of
code
in libmsrpc.c. Maybe I'm confused..but should that strcmp maybe be
compared to != 0?
/*change the server name in the
On Thu, 13 Jul 2006 14:23:14 -0800
Damien Hull [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And yes, I did it with '/usr/bin/passwd %u' too. No success, no traces.
Maybe the developers have some light the shed on this. (anyone?,please?)
Still waiting for directions...
I'm seeing the same thing. I
No offense intended, but what is the purpose of
adding the variations of case especially with respect to
the FQDN?
Too much guessing IMO.
True. Very true. But I'll chime in with we got there after
numerous authentication failures at different sites.
It always seemed there had to be a
Hi all,
I've setup a samba server that use vfs extd_audit module and I got a
problem with Japense file name and folder name. After being written to
syslog, all those Japanese name are changed to
æ\226°ã\201\227ã\201\204ã\203\225ã\202(c)ã\203«ã\203\200
Is there anyone that have same problem? How
Hello!
Is there tdb format changes between 3.0.22 and 3.0.23?
I get after upgrade from smbstatus:
131209 794911341 unknown-please report ! e-share_access =
0x44b5eb35, e-private_options = 0x2314d
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
Hi,
I was asked to implement logon and logoff control in our network. I read
in the link below that those parameters are no used (unless not yet). Is
there any other way to do it? Or any hope that it will be implemented soon?
Just for the record, I did find a workaround that seemed to work after
looking at the debug files a little more closely.
In the smbusers file (mapping account names to local names), I put in the
line
DOMAIN\user = user
And that seemed to work too. Not really the best solution for me
Jerry,
Things still worked fine for existing domain members. I only noticed it
because I added a new system to the domain. Lines 962-964 of utils/net_ads.c
have comments about the upn but it's never being added. I rarely program in
C so this may not be the best way to do it but I modified line 977
No I really mean DOMAIN\user = user
BTW, the patch provided to me works successfully.
==
M. D. Parker
Systems Administrator
General Atomics / Electromagnetic Systems
+1 858 455 2877
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Gerald (Jerry)
I've verified that this patch solves my problem. Although I note that
there are two copies of the patch in the attachment.
==
M. D. Parker
Systems Administrator
General Atomics / Electromagnetic Systems
+1 858 455 2877
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original
Checkout this link
http://forums.us.dell.com/supportforums/board/message?board.id=pv_nasmessage.id=341query.id=16070#M341
_
This mail sent using V-webmail - http://www.v-webmail.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL
Jerry,
I used the convention which I'm accustomed to which is that the host
should be added in fqdn form since I was modifying the code myself.
i.e. host/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Help me understand how you use 'kinit -k' What kind of cron jobs are these?
And why can't you use 'kinit -k machine$'?
If the only reason for the UPN is so its more like MIT, then I'm inclined
to push back and say just precreate
the machine account with a UPN before joining the domain.
Or I could add a switch to 'net ads join' that said create the UPN. I
don't really want to make it default
behavior. Would
On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 12:43:54PM +0500, Dmitry Melekhov wrote:
Hello!
Is there tdb format changes between 3.0.22 and 3.0.23?
I get after upgrade from smbstatus:
Yes the format changed. You must use the new smbstatus
that shipped with 3.0.23.
Jeremy.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go
On Wed, 2006-07-12 at 11:06 +0200, Ulrich Windl wrote:
Hi,
I was trying smbmount (SuSE's samba-client-3.0.20b-3.4). The mount command
replied:
cli_negprot: SMB signing is mandatory and we have disabled it.
9451: protocol negotiation failed
SMB connection failed
No I'd suggest to change
Author: abartlet
Date: 2006-07-13 09:28:35 + (Thu, 13 Jul 2006)
New Revision: 17004
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=17004
Log:
Add a new helper mode to ntlm_auth: ntlm-change-password-1
This mode proxies pre-calculated blobs from a remote (probably
Author: abartlet
Date: 2006-07-13 09:29:25 + (Thu, 13 Jul 2006)
New Revision: 17005
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=17005
Log:
Add a new helper mode to ntlm_auth: ntlm-change-password-1
This mode proxies pre-calculated blobs from a remote (probably
Author: abartlet
Date: 2006-07-13 09:30:37 + (Thu, 13 Jul 2006)
New Revision: 17006
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=17006
Log:
Increment winbindd protocol version number.
Andrew Bartlett
Modified:
trunk/source/nsswitch/winbindd_nss.h
Author: abartlet
Date: 2006-07-13 09:31:04 + (Thu, 13 Jul 2006)
New Revision: 17007
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=17007
Log:
Increment winbind protocol version number.
Andrew Bartlett
Modified:
Author: metze
Date: 2006-07-13 13:51:54 + (Thu, 13 Jul 2006)
New Revision: 17008
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=17008
Log:
on SMB2 Create the delete_on_close flag isn't ignored for
existing opened files as it is for SMB.
metze
Modified:
Author: metze
Date: 2006-07-13 14:31:11 + (Thu, 13 Jul 2006)
New Revision: 17009
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=17009
Log:
set the protocol version correct
metze
Modified:
branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/smb_server/smb2/negprot.c
Changeset:
Author: vlendec
Date: 2006-07-13 15:03:46 + (Thu, 13 Jul 2006)
New Revision: 17010
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=17010
Log:
If winbind is not around, add S-1-22-1-uid to the user's token.
See the comment in the patch for the reason.
Volker
Author: vlendec
Date: 2006-07-13 15:37:58 + (Thu, 13 Jul 2006)
New Revision: 17011
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=17011
Log:
Back out r17010 after talking to Jerry. Another fix pending...
Volker
Modified:
Author: metze
Date: 2006-07-13 15:46:36 + (Thu, 13 Jul 2006)
New Revision: 17012
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=17012
Log:
don't try to send any data when the socket is gone already...
(fixes crash bugs)
metze
Modified:
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
