On Wednesday 28 February 2007 11:21, "Rahul Tidke" wrote:
> Feb 28 09:16:10 espl nmbd[3086]: process_local_master_announce: Server
> VINAY at IP 192.168.10.50 is announcing itself as a local master browser for
> workgroup EXCELIZE and we think we are master. Forcing election.
Server VINAY powe
Hello!
Can anybody tell me what is the meaning of following logs
(/var/log/messages).
Feb 28 09:16:10 espl nmbd[3086]: process_local_master_announce: Server
VINAY at IP 192.168.10.50 is announcing itself as a local master browser for
workgroup EXCELIZE and we think we are master. Forcing
On Tuesday 27 February 2007 20:15, Roman Bigler wrote:
> SYMPTOMS
>
> 1) Invoked "kinit", no error messages are generated, verbose mode
> says "Authenticated to Kerberos v5".
> 2) "klist" thereafter returns a valid ticket.
> 3) Trying to join the AD with "net ads join" et cetera however
Am Mittwoch, 28. Februar 2007 03:24 schrieb Frank Gruman:
> Hello all,
>
> I've been peacefully using Samba 3 for about 3 years now, and it has done a
> wonderful job in my little world as domain member servers for file and print
> serving. Much bettetrver farms that some of my peers in the com
>From: Frank Gruman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: 2007/02/27 Tue PM 08:24:45 CST
>To: samba@lists.samba.org
>Subject: [Samba] Building Samba 4 - Includes.c missing?
>Hello all,
>
>I've been peacefully using Samba 3 for about 3 years now, and it has done a
>wonderful job in my little world as domain
Hello all,
I've been peacefully using Samba 3 for about 3 years now, and it has done a
wonderful job in my little world as domain member servers for file and print
serving. Much bettetrver farms that some of my peers in the company are using.
So I want to try Samba 4 and see if I can play with
Hi Ben,
One way of doing it is to use a policy file - NTConfig.pol which is
loaded by each user when they login to the domain from your [netlogon]
share. The login banner is created with a standard option - check out
http://www.pcc-services.com/articles/implement_sys_policies.html for
details
Thank you for your answer.
I actually did not point out exactly enough what i want to do, sorry
for that ...
I read these postings and also some sections in the samba howto and
several descriptions on the net, but i understand all these in that
way, that the samba server is reconfigured to
Short: Yes, it's possible.
Long: The "How" depends on your situation however, and since you
don't state much information in this direction...
You can achieve almost anything with Batchfiles on Windows,
especially in conjunction with WSH. Google is your friend for this.
Ben Natala wrote:
I am i
Hello All,
I have Samba 3.0.23a setup on a HP-UX box. I have also configured Kerberos.
The samba system talks to an Active Directory 2003 system for
authentication. I get the following error message when the smbd service
tries to start. The nmbd and winbindd services start without any errors. I
I am interested in creating a logon message to be delivered to users
when they logon. Is this possible? And if so, how can this be done?
With logon scripts? The majority of my clients are connecting from
Windows XP Pro, SAMBA is running on Debian Etch.
Thank You
--
To unsubscribe from this
Hi,
I am receiving the following error message on Samba domain member
(SLES9/3.0.24). Both PDC and BDC are Samba (smbldap) (SUSE 10.1 Samba
3.0.22):
"User nobody with invalid SID
S-1-5-21-3838309271-3077283710-20730714-2998 in passdb"
This message is new having upgraded to current version from
On Tuesday 27 February 2007, Schaefer Jr, Thomas R. wrote:
> I'm not using Samba as a domain controller, I'm using it as a member
> server in Windows Server 2003 controlled domains.
Isn't "security = ads" proper in this case?
Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and rea
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
You mean by rereading the xinetd.d ?
I do not know what to do than in the worsed case restartx, or end
current session, and call upon localhost:904 (in this case..
Do i miss something?
Gary Dale schreef:
> Have you re/started the SWAT service?
>
> M
Have you re/started the SWAT service?
M9. wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Well that was clear enough, i changed the port in the xinetd.d also, but
i am not able to invoke swat.
when trying to call localhost:904 (unassigned port) i get the message:
can not connect to server
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Well that was clear enough, i changed the port in the xinetd.d also, but
i am not able to invoke swat.
when trying to call localhost:904 (unassigned port) i get the message:
can not connect to server on localhost 904
Gary Dale schreef:
> Sorry if
On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 15:14:04 -0800
Greg J Zartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What fails? Vista *should* work against us even without
>
> It does. I've been authenticating Vista machines for some time
against
> a Samba PDC.
>
I'm not using Samba as a domain controller, I'm using it as a me
Ladies and genttlemen, today I realized my Samba server has a problem. I
had to create some new users and recieved this message after every try:
[2007/02/27 10:56:52, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic(1599)
PANIC (pid 31987): pdb_get_methods_reload: failed to get pdb methods
for backend tdbsam smbpassw
Sorry if that's not clear. You need to edit /etc/services to give SWAT a
different port number - see man swat and man services for information.
Change it to an unassigned port.
M9. wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Some things are not fine, like swat uses port 901/tcp..
wh
Forrest,
First you will need a [print$] share (which is where the drivers reside)
as described here:
http://us4.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/classicalprinting.html#id358044
/var/spool/samba is for the print jobs, not the drivers.
Move "printing = cups" to global. Add to gl
Change it to an unassigned port.
M9. wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Some things are not fine, like swat uses port 901/tcp..
what if this port allready has been taken?
omginitialrefs 900/udp# OMG Initial Refs
# Christian Callsen <[EMAIL PR
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Some things are not fine, like swat uses port 901/tcp..
what if this port allready has been taken?
> omginitialrefs 900/udp# OMG Initial Refs
> #Christian Callsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> swat 901/tcp# CONFLICT,
I have found a fixed my previous problems (two typos that were hard to
find) and now the smbldap-tools all work as expected if I run them as
root. However when I try to join a domain from a windows machine, the
scripts never run and get an "Access is denied message". Since I am
using 0.10 I do no
FYI.
from the Samba How-To
"The privileges that have been implemented in Samba-3.0.11 are shown
below. It is possible, and likely, that additional privileges may be
implemented in later releases of Samba. It is also likely that any
privileges currently implemented but not used may be removed from
I'm trying to share my HP 5610 on my Samba (3.0.24-1 fc6 x86_64) machine and
am running into a typical HP related SANFU. The XP drivers supplied only
install through the installation program. (ie. I can't use device manager
to point XP to the driver and install it) So I installed the printer on
Hello list,
I'm writing some scripts that executes the net command.
I have noticed that sometimes when things goes wrong the net command
asks for input i.e a password which results in a hanging script.
Is there some way to avoid this?
I've looked at the different flags fro net command but have
I have recently done it with no problems:
my config.log
$ ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/samba3024 --without-ads
--with-libiconv=/usr
/local --with-acl-support --with-ldap
## - ##
## Platform. ##
## - ##
hostname = myhost
uname -m = sun4u
uname -r = 5.9
uname -s = SunOS
un
Gerald (Jerry) Carter napisał(a):
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dave Abouav wrote:
Any idea why the 8.3 names are so weird? Is this typical
for Samba now?
It is by design.You might want to look at the
mangling method option in smb.conf(5).
so to use:
magling
Anyone
Travis Knabe wrote:
I'm currently running samba 3.0.20a
I can configure and make 3.0.20a with no problem
I run the same configure command on the 3.0.24 source, configure works
fine, but make returns the following.
( and just to test if a patch screwed me up I tested configuring a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Correct, the executable is present there, thnx ;)
Roman Bigler schreef:
> Ok, still not completely sure what you mean, but this might help you:
> http://us1.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/SWAT.html#xinetd
>
> The location of the execu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yes that is what the manual at:
http://us4.samba.org/samba/docs/using_samba/ch02.html
says, only the location were swat should be is not correct for X86_64...
Gary Dale schreef:
> You need to update your inetd / xinetd config to start SWAT.
>
>
> M9.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Well, to invoke swat, you have to specify its location, this location i
need to know..
Roman Bigler schreef:
>
> You have to specify which files you mean. We don't have
> magic crystal balls, unfortunately.
>
>
> Hi,
>
> As a result of not being able
You need to update your inetd / xinetd config to start SWAT.
M9. wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
As a result of not being able to control the shares, (invisible
network), i wanted to enable swat, but the files are not were they
supposed to be
Can anyone help me?
Hi List,
this is gonna be a really funky/interesting/uncommon error you're
going to deal with (if you do).
Developer(s): I'd be really happy if you can point me at the right
source files or describe at which
stage of the "discussion" between my servers fail. This might be of
some use..
You have to specify which files you mean. We don't have
magic crystal balls, unfortunately.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
As a result of not being able to control the shares, (invisible
network), i wanted to enable swat, but the files are not were they
supposed to be
My original message did not seem to come through, so I'm including it
in this message.
Update to the Symptoms: It does not matter which user or password
(wrong/correct) I use for
"net ads join", it fails in any case.
This is really confusing.
Begin forwarded message:
Hi List,
this is gon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
As a result of not being able to control the shares, (invisible
network), i wanted to enable swat, but the files are not were they
supposed to be
Can anyone help me?
- --
Have a nice day,
M9. Now, is the only time that exists
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/27/2007 08:17 AM, Daniel Müller wrote:
> Hello to all,
> I got samba3 PDC working with ldap. But I' m still wondering
> how to set important things about the users passwords.
You can use pdbedit to configure that. Your
sambaDomainName o
Hello all
When a windows xp workstation join a domain, by windows gui parameters, ldap
machine attributes are not filled correctly:
- No attribute sambaprimarygroupsid (before, there was one terminated by 515)
- rid (of sambasid) is not equal a 2*uid+1000
gid attribute is ok (515)
If i create a
A quick suggestion: install and use SWAT to make your server a member
server (it has a wizard for that) and to create your shares. At the very
least, it will remove the comments from your smb.conf file to make it
easier to find the problem. :)
Kevin Gutch wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to create s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
M9. schreef:
>
>
> Volker Lendecke schreef:
>> On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 04:21:59PM +0100, M9. wrote:
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> smbclient -L tribal-sfn2
>>> Password:
>>> Domain=[TRIBAL-SFN2] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.0.23d-19.2-1179-SUSE-SL10.2]
>>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Volker Lendecke schreef:
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 04:21:59PM +0100, M9. wrote:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> smbclient -L tribal-sfn2
>> Password:
>> Domain=[TRIBAL-SFN2] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.0.23d-19.2-1179-SUSE-SL10.2]
>> tree connect failed: NT_ST
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 04:21:59PM +0100, M9. wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> smbclient -L tribal-sfn2
> Password:
> Domain=[TRIBAL-SFN2] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.0.23d-19.2-1179-SUSE-SL10.2]
> tree connect failed: NT_STATUS_BAD_NETWORK_NAME
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~>
Have you done something weird to t
Hi,
I am trying to create shares that are accessible thru Domain
Authentication. I am able to join the domain thru net ads join -U
administrator
All of the following commands work:
net ads join -U administrator
testparm
net ads info
wbinfo -u
wbinfo -g
Everything seems to be w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Volker Lendecke schreef:
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 03:51:36PM +0100, M9. wrote:
>> Now i have:
>>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> smbclient -L//tribal-sfn2
>
> Remove the "//".
>
> Volker
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> smbclient -L tribal-sfn2
Password:
Domain=[TR
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 03:51:36PM +0100, M9. wrote:
> Now i have:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> smbclient -L//tribal-sfn2
Remove the "//".
Volker
pgpS1U26bRWQl.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
CC'ing back to list for archives.
Paul Smith wrote:
> As you can see, everything looks fine except from the two "parts" group
> mappings and the "users" mapping:
>
> parts (S-1-5-21-3597458131-155160113-1223051555-132073) -> parts
> parts (S-1-5-21-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On the machine tribal-sfn2, i have had a normal and useable lan, (after
some difficulties)
Now i have:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> smbclient -L//tribal-sfn2
Password:
Domain=[TRIBAL-SFN2] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.0.23d-19.2-1179-SUSE-SL10.2]
tree conn
Hello,
we want to move our Samba PDC controller from a Solaris (2.8)
machine to
a Linux (CentOS4.4) machine.
We have the following plan (on both servers is Samba installed. We use
the passdb-backend smbpasswd):
1) Stop Samba on the Solaris machine
2) Copy all machine accounts from Solaris /e
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 03:23:48PM +0100, Rainer Traut wrote:
> Solved:
> host msdfs = no
> is needed.
Really? "msdfs root = no" on the profile share is not
enough? I'm asking because I've changed the "msdfs root"
default to no, and if Vista really barfs at "host msdfs = yes"
then we might have t
Solved:
host msdfs = no
is needed.
Rainer
Rainer Traut schrieb:
Hi,
I have problems with our fist Vista machine to create/access the server
profile.
The machine has joined the domain without hitch.
When logging in I am informed by vista the userprofile could not be
retrieved.
Logging in th
Hello,
we want to move our Samba PDC controller from a Solaris (2.8) machine to
a Linux (CentOS4.4) machine.
We have the following plan (on both servers is Samba installed. We use
the passdb-backend smbpasswd):
1) Stop Samba on the Solaris machine
2) Copy all machine accounts from Solaris /etc/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul Smith wrote:
> I'll have a play with the "net groupmap modify" and "net groupmap
> delete" commands after hours and will post back my findings. Thanks for
> your help.
I'm pretty behind on email so I'm just scanning, but you
know about 'net gro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dave Abouav wrote:
> Any idea why the 8.3 names are so weird? Is this typical
> for Samba now?
It is by design.You might want to look at the
mangling method option in smb.conf(5).
cheers, jerry
==
Hello to all,
I got samba3 PDC working with ldap. But I' m still wondering how to set
important things about the users passwords.
The first thing when a user login the first time should be to change his/her
password? Where do I set when the passwords expire and how do I set it to 60
days?
I do n
Hi,
How do I go about creating user specified drives on Win2k and XP clients
i.e. mapping linux directories to different users. I am wondering if you
could specify more then one "logon drive = X" thing.
Could it be done without running logon.bat on client machines?
Ned
--
View this message in c
On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 02:16:17AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hey Everyone...
>
>I'm hoping this is an easy one. I am using the ntlogon scripts that
> come with the samba examples (ntlogon.py and ntlogon.conf). It's working
> fine, except for one thing. I'm trying to set entries up fo
Hello,
change this in your configure line:
--host=i686 --target=arm-linux
This fixes your error (remove the --build=...).
BTW: I pre-set the following variables:
export samba_cv_HAVE_MEMORY_KEYTAB=set
export samba_cv_USE_SETEUID=set
export samba_cv_HAVE_WRFILE_KEYTAB=set
export ac_cv_path_KRB5
Dave Abouav pisze:
I have a Samba server installed on FreeBSD (latest releases of both),
and an old Windows application that uses the 8.3 short names in
directory listings. I have the problem that the 8.3 file names
returned are quite strange, and hardly resemble the originals. Some
examples:
59 matches
Mail list logo
