Hello,
Perhaps this post is not directly connected with Samba itself but after
I saw that Samba uses EXOP for LDAP password changing I decided to write
it to this list as well. Here is what I'd like to do:
1) I use openldap-2.3.35 for Samba auth mechanism
2) additionally I use openldap for
Hi all,
is it possible to configure winbind to not ask for the Domain-Users Group ?
All my users should not be member of this primary Group, because i created my
own Unix Group in the AD. Is it possible to change the Group membership to this
Unix Group to get winbind out of asking for
Hi,
Did i understand it correctly that the difference between security=ADS and
security=domain is ADS will use Kerberos and domain will not ?
I configured my winbind with security=ADS. Could i change this to domain ?
How do you think about the security question ?
Andy
-Messaggio originale-
Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
conto di Andreas Ladanyi
Inviato: lunedì 7 maggio 2007 9.31
A: samba@lists.samba.org
Oggetto: [Samba] winbind AD and Kerberos !
Hi,
Did i understand it correctly that the difference between
security=ADS and
Hello list,
I'm testing out smbcacls to handle acls on a linux samba server with
ext3 filesystem(acls enabled).
1. How can I change the rights mask with smbcacls? I.e mask:r-- ?
2. How can I change the permissions for an ACL to none?
/usr/local/samba/bin/smbcacls //192.168.100.1/testshare
Hello
When I perform the net rpc trustdom list command I get the
couldn't enumerate accounts error.
I use LDAP as passdb backend with approximately 3 accounts.
If I run the command, I can see from my LDAP logs that it tries to
list every account on the LDAP server. Therefore the net rpc
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 10:37:03AM +0200, werner maes wrote:
When I perform the net rpc trustdom list command I get the
couldn't enumerate accounts error.
I use LDAP as passdb backend with approximately 3 accounts.
If I run the command, I can see from my LDAP logs that it tries to
list
Hello List,
we are currently looking for a Ubuntu server setup (ideally v. 6.06)
with authentication and authorisation based on OpenLDAP for all
services. The needed services are Samba (PDC), Apache (htaccess), Squid,
OpenXchange, NIS.
Does someone have such a setup and is willing to share?
Hello Folks,
I have a samba server that i use as a file sharing system.
I change the old machine for a new Ahtlon X2.
Everything was perfect but when i did the installation and attribution
; i have the same problem!
The client (WINXP) keeps telling me that he cannot access to my
sharing folder
Hello List
I'm running Samba 3.0.24,1 on a freebsd 6 server
I've joined the unix server to an active directory domain and set up PAM
I've shared directories and users can access them (provided they belong to
the correct group)
the problem is :
if I list the shared directory
mail#
I've seen this problem when the Samba server clock is out of sync with
the AD servers. Come to think of it, lots of problems happen because of
that.
Gianluca Culot wrote:
Hello List
I'm running Samba 3.0.24,1 on a freebsd 6 server
I've joined the unix server to an active directory domain
We have problems with connecting from some xp pcs to our linux fileserver when
using the netbios name of the server,
when i try to connect the authentication error message apears and asks for user
/password,
the problem occurs only when i connect via host names, when i connect via IP it
works
-Messaggio originale-
Da: Aaron Kincer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Inviato: lunedì 7 maggio 2007 14.34
A: Gianluca Culot
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Samba. Org
Oggetto: Re: [Samba] problem listing directories with AD permissions
I've seen this problem when the Samba server clock is out of
On Thu, 03 May 2007 18:24:19 -0400 Felix Miata [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2007/05/03 17:32 (GMT+0100) John G Walker apparently typed:
I installed samba on a PC running SuSE 10.2, using the version from
the SuSE 10.2 repository (3.0.23). All very nice, except smbmount is
missing.
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 01:46:33PM +0100, John G Walker wrote:
As far as I understand it, Windows 98 doesn't use CIFS. Since the
object of using Samba is partly to access a Windows 98 machine, not
having SMBFS available sort of defeats the object of using Samba in the
first place. Maybe they
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John G Walker wrote:
So why is SuSE (or Novell) telling me what I should
or shouldn't use? In any case, this is a bout the world I live
in, not about their or my preferences.
smbfs.kio is unmaintained and no one wants to touch it.
It's not just
Hi,
I have problems with text file busy on a samba file server using
Windows or Linux clients. This server is used to store the working
copy of subversion users and when they try an 'svn update' the 'text
file busy' appears (sometimes). The temporary solution is to kill the
smbd process asigned
Dear all
Im using samba which comes with Solaris 9 , i want to
share unix directory with windows , samba and windows
2003 PDC are on different network ,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] # /usr/sfw/sbin/smbd -V
Version 2.2.12
here are the steps i follow:
-created computer account for solaris box in Windows
On Monday 07 May 2007, John G Walker wrote:
So why is SuSE (or Novell) telling me what I should or shouldn't use?
In any case, this is a bout the world I live in, not about their or my
preferences.
They're not. Nothing is stopping you from compiling your own kernel and adding
modules, or even
Hi,
On 5/1/07, Aaron Kincer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been working at this for a few days now and I can't figure out what
is broken. Google turns up similar issues from years back, but I hope
this is a bug resurfacing. ACL entries are being deleted when files are
saved. Here is an example:
-Original Message-
Hi,
After upgrading samba from 3.0.14(Sarge) to 3.0.24(Etch) I cannot save
file I have edit anymore on home shares, local shares works.
It's possible to create/delete/rename dir/files. But if I try to edit a
file and save it windows complains:
The process cannot
On Mon, 7 May 2007 10:37:37 -0400 Chris Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 07 May 2007, John G Walker wrote:
So why is SuSE (or Novell) telling me what I should or shouldn't
use? In any case, this is a bout the world I live in, not about
their or my preferences.
They're not.
On 5/1/07, Aaron Kincer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been working at this for a few days now and I can't figure out what
is broken. Google turns up similar issues from years back, but I hope
this is a bug resurfacing. ACL entries are being deleted when files are
saved. Here is an example:
On 2007/05/07 13:46 (GMT+0100) John G Walker apparently typed:
On Thu, 03 May 2007 18:24:19 -0400 Felix Miata [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SUSE wants you to use cifs instead of smbfs,
So why is SuSE (or Novell) telling me what I should or shouldn't use?
In any case, this is a bout the world I
I figured it out in general over the weekend. I didn't have all the
right smb.conf entries. Somehow they were removed. I think SWAT did it.
I won't be using it anymore as a result. I'm sure there's good logic
behind it removing smb.conf entries, but I'm not going to try to parse
them out. I'll
OK. I did an upgrade on this server to FC6 so the new options will be available
to me.
The inherit owner option seems to do the trick in keeping users from taking
ownership.
Only one problem left:
When I open, edit and change a file it is changing the file permissions from:
rwxrwx---
to
Got it.
Entered:
force create mode = 0770
in the Global section of my smb.conf file
Cheers,
Travis Bullock
Systems Administrator
Avmax Group Inc.
- Original Message -
From: Travis Bullock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jeremy Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: samba samba@lists.samba.org
Sent:
On Mon, 2007-05-07 at 09:25 -0600, Travis Bullock wrote:
OK. I did an upgrade on this server to FC6 so the new options will be
available to me.
The inherit owner option seems to do the trick in keeping users from taking
ownership.
Only one problem left:
When I open, edit and change
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Felix,
On 2007/05/07 13:46 (GMT+0100) John G Walker apparently typed:
On Thu, 03 May 2007 18:24:19 -0400 Felix Miata [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SUSE wants you to use cifs instead of smbfs,
So why is SuSE (or Novell) telling me what I should
I have installed a Samba 3 server to run as PDC in parallel with the
old NT4 server.
They both use different Domain names and netbios names.
the NT server uses NT-SERVER as netbios name and INTERFACE as workgroup.
The new Samba server uses IFDOMAIN both as workgroup and netbios name.
When I try
I would like to be able to setup shares i n the following manner.
I want a basic root share folder. Let's say it is the /Home directory.
This will be a shared drive for all users on our network. Everyone will
have read access. Under this folder
will be several shared folders that are user
I would like to be able to setup shares i n the following manner.
I want a basic root share folder. Let's say it is the /Home directory.
This will be a shared drive for all users on our network. Everyone will
have read access. Under this folder
will be several shared folders that are user
On the other hand, I would love to be able to use cifs exclusively, but
I have several network drives ( WD and TrendNet ), and neither brand
will mount via cifs with a credentials file. I have to use smbfs if I
am to access them. No amount of googling has provided me with a clue,
and a
There may be another way, but POSIX ACLs will allow you to do what you
want I believe. I use them that way now with one difference--I don't
have shares defined underneath other shares. I'm not sure if that makes
a difference.
Kevin Gutch wrote:
I would like to be able to setup shares i n the
I am trying to map a samba share from a Windows 2003 server. I am mapping
the share as:
\\server-ip-address\proventia
The error message I receive is: The network path could not be found.
I am running using samba-3.0.24-4.fc5
When I run testparm on my smb.conf file, everything looks fine.
If I
Hello,
I'm working with the samba-3.0.23c version currently released for use
with RHEL-5. I'm trying to switch into ADS security from DOMAIN
security and I'm having trouble with account mapping. Currently the
mapping happens because the unix account name matches the windows
account name. That
On Mon, 07 May 2007 11:27:44 -0400 Felix Miata [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This isn't directly related, but I think it's indirectly related in a
major way. W98 is so horribly insecure that developers don't want to
mess with it, which means testing CIFS with it is a logistical
problem. The
On Mon, 07 May 2007 12:11:31 -0400 Kevin Gutch
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to be able to setup shares i n the following manner.
I want a basic root share folder. Let's say it is the /Home
directory. This will be a shared drive for all users on our network.
Everyone will have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dale Schroeder wrote:
On the other hand, I would love to be able to use cifs exclusively, but
I have several network drives ( WD and TrendNet ), and neither brand
will mount via cifs with a credentials file. I have to use smbfs if I
am to access
On Mon, 07 May 2007 09:00:31 -0500 Gerald (Jerry) Carter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As far as I understand it, Windows 98 doesn't use CIFS.
Support for netbios transport was added in cifs.ko I think around
2.6.15
So this would mean that I can access W98 files via CIFS? Felix says not.
On 2007/05/07 10:44 (GMT-0500) Gerald (Jerry) Carter apparently typed:
On 2007/05/07 13:46 (GMT+0100) John G Walker apparently typed:
I think SUSE is saying the same thing as other distros. They
prefer to give you maintained but dysfunctional CIFS over
functional but unmaintained networking
Hi list, i have a problem, i have a samba server that is a member of a
AD domain, i can check the users with wbinfo -u and all is working...
But, in the samba machine i have a openldap server that i need to user
the users of openldap in samba!
How my samba machine is member of the AD domain, it
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 01:36:26PM -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
I don't file bugs on samba because it's all over my head. I'm not a
developer.
Just to assure you: Over my head is just a false
assumption. We might ask you to provide log files and
network traces, and we might ask you to update to
No offense, but it sounds like you are venting about something that
wasn't enabled for the packages in your particular distro of choice. If
so, it seems to me that this is the wrong venue to vent. I would suggest
contacting the vendor, distro maintainer and/or package maintainer with
your
On Monday 07 May 2007, John G Walker wrote:
I have a W98 machine that I need to share files with
other machines on the network, and no amount of wishful thinking will
change that.
Maybe useful thinking can. Like how about transferring the files that are on
the W98 system to a CD or
Anyone has a clue ?
I don't even know where to start
Thanks you
Franck
On 5/7/07, Franck Y [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Folks,
I have a samba server that i use as a file sharing system.
I change the old machine for a new Ahtlon X2.
Everything was perfect but when i did the installation
One of the servers we admin has countless such errors in log.smbd:
[2007/05/07 14:17:08, 0] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(783)
tdb(/var/cache/samba/printing/HPLJ3600.tdb): rec_read bad magic 0x443810ec at
offset=28412
The only thread I saw regarding rec_read stated:
If this really happens often to
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 02:33:33PM -0400, Michael Lueck wrote:
One of the servers we admin has countless such errors in log.smbd:
[2007/05/07 14:17:08, 0] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(783)
tdb(/var/cache/samba/printing/HPLJ3600.tdb): rec_read bad magic
0x443810ec at offset=28412
The only
On 2007/05/07 18:21 (GMT+0100) John G Walker apparently typed:
On Mon, 07 May 2007 09:00:31 -0500 Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
As far as I understand it, Windows 98 doesn't use CIFS.
Support for netbios transport was added in cifs.ko I think around
2.6.15
So this would mean that I can
Jeremy Allison wrote:
No, I'd run memcheck on that server :-).
Is that basically Memtest86? I have that downloaded.
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 02:43:15PM -0400, Michael Lueck wrote:
Jeremy Allison wrote:
No, I'd run memcheck on that server :-).
Is that basically Memtest86? I have that downloaded.
Yep, that's what I meant.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
Jeremy Allison wrote:
No, I'd run memcheck on that server :-).
Is that basically Memtest86? I have that downloaded.
Yep, that's what I meant.
All right, I may even get Memtest86 run this evening. Will report pass/fail to
this thread.
Thanks!
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
On Mon, 7 May 2007 14:19:29 -0400 Chris Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 07 May 2007, John G Walker wrote:
I have a W98 machine that I need to share files with
other machines on the network, and no amount of wishful thinking
will change that.
Maybe useful thinking can. Like
All right, I may even get Memtest86 run this evening. Will report pass/fail to
this thread.
Thanks!
Being that I have used this type of software countless times I just
wanted to say a few things about memtest86 (and memory testing in
general). The first thing is memtest86 can not prove that
John Drescher wrote:
If you get a single
failure you have some type of hardware problem
It is always possible...
which may include a
problem with the electricity (1/2 second power outage...).
The systems at this client are powered via a UPS, so I am not suspecting
trouble there.
I have
On Monday 07 May 2007, John G Walker wrote:
The files are on a W98 system for historical reasons and they are
being slowly migrated off. However, the reason I can't just move them
is because I'm using Windows programs on the legacy systems. Some I
wrote myself, in Visual Basic, so I can't
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 07:55:26PM +0100, John G Walker wrote:
But thanks all the same for taking an interest. I suppose there's
always a chance that off-the-wall suggestions will work, and I'd rather
hear a hundred suggestions that won't work than miss one that will,
File concrete bug reports
On 2007/05/07 23:28 (GMT+0200) Volker Lendecke apparently typed:
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 07:55:26PM +0100, John G Walker wrote:
But thanks all the same for taking an interest. I suppose there's
always a chance that off-the-wall suggestions will work, and I'd rather
hear a hundred suggestions
we are currently looking for a Ubuntu server setup (ideally v. 6.06)
with authentication and authorisation based on OpenLDAP for all
services. The needed services are Samba (PDC), Apache (htaccess), Squid,
OpenXchange, NIS.
Does someone have such a setup and is willing to share?
We don´t
On Mon, 7 May 2007 23:28:10 +0200 Volker Lendecke
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 07:55:26PM +0100, John G Walker wrote:
But thanks all the same for taking an interest. I suppose there's
always a chance that off-the-wall suggestions will work, and I'd
rather hear a
On Mon, 7 May 2007 15:42:16 -0400 Chris Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 07 May 2007, John G Walker wrote:
The files are on a W98 system for historical reasons and they are
being slowly migrated off. However, the reason I can't just move
them is because I'm using Windows programs
First some background -
We got an old, tired PII, 233 server running NT 4.0
We have a Compaq Proliant that is a quad 550 Xeon CPU, 4 GB, 320 GB of
HD, a tape drive etc. It formerly was an Oracle Server that had SCO
UnixWare 7 on it. Currently it is having a problem - bad controller
card,
On Tue, 08 May 2007 01:41:42 +0100, John G Walker wrote:
Basically, W98 is so primitive that the only practical solution is to let
the complexities of the situation be handled by Linux. I'm beginning to
feel that restricting sharing the W98 data to the SuSE 10.0 machine is the
best solution.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Author: derrell
Date: 2007-05-07 03:02:24 + (Mon, 07 May 2007)
New Revision: 22731
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=22731
Log:
- Fix bug #4594.
configure.in
Author: vlendec
Date: 2007-05-07 09:35:35 + (Mon, 07 May 2007)
New Revision: 22736
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=22736
Log:
Start to merge the low-hanging fruit from the now 7000-line cluster patch.
This changes struct process_id to struct
Author: gd
Date: 2007-05-07 10:14:32 + (Mon, 07 May 2007)
New Revision: 22737
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=22737
Log:
Fix crash bug (info3 is now talloced).
Guenther
Modified:
branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/nsswitch/winbindd_ads.c
Author: kseeger
Date: 2007-05-07 10:40:00 + (Mon, 07 May 2007)
New Revision: 1108
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=samba-docsrev=1108
Log:
Clarify the description of inherit acls in smb.conf manpage (hopefully fixing
bugs #1806 and #1809)
Modified:
Author: vlendec
Date: 2007-05-07 11:04:38 + (Mon, 07 May 2007)
New Revision: 22738
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=22738
Log:
Fix a debug message.
G?\195?\188nther, please check this!
Thanks,
Volker
Modified:
Author: obnox
Date: 2007-05-07 11:25:00 + (Mon, 07 May 2007)
New Revision: 22739
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=22739
Log:
Make prototypes in include/util_tdb.h of some functions from
lib/util_tdb.c exactly match the definitions. (There were
some
Author: vlendec
Date: 2007-05-07 12:15:11 + (Mon, 07 May 2007)
New Revision: 22740
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=22740
Log:
Move debug_*_user_token to token_utils.c
Modified:
branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/auth/auth_util.c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: gd
Date: 2007-05-07 10:14:32 + (Mon, 07 May 2007)
New Revision: 22737
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=22737
Log:
Fix crash bug (info3 is now talloced).
Thanks
Author: jelmer
Date: 2007-05-07 12:31:42 + (Mon, 07 May 2007)
New Revision: 22741
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=22741
Log:
Add MSVC-specific pragma's for Wireshark. Patch from Ronnie.
Modified:
Author: jelmer
Date: 2007-05-07 12:41:23 + (Mon, 07 May 2007)
New Revision: 22742
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=22742
Log:
Fix tests.
Modified:
branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/pidl/lib/Parse/Pidl/Wireshark/NDR.pm
Changeset:
Modified:
Author: metze
Date: 2007-05-07 13:32:34 + (Mon, 07 May 2007)
New Revision: 22743
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=22743
Log:
set the talloc name to the string...
metze
Modified:
branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/lib/charset/util_unistr.c
Changeset:
Author: vlendec
Date: 2007-05-07 13:39:25 + (Mon, 07 May 2007)
New Revision: 22744
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=22744
Log:
Fix a valgrind error. parse_domain_username does not necessarily fill in
the domain.
Modified:
Author: vlendec
Date: 2007-05-07 13:56:57 + (Mon, 07 May 2007)
New Revision: 22745
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=22745
Log:
Add local groups to the --required-membership-sid test. This needs
merging to 3_0_26 once Michael's net conf changes have
Author: metze
Date: 2007-05-07 15:05:04 + (Mon, 07 May 2007)
New Revision: 22746
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=22746
Log:
fix the build of the sqlite module
metze
Modified:
branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/lib/ldb/ldb_sqlite3/ldb_sqlite3.c
Author: vlendec
Date: 2007-05-07 15:07:49 + (Mon, 07 May 2007)
New Revision: 22747
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=22747
Log:
Fix some C++ warnings
Modified:
branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/librpc/ndr/ndr.c
Author: metze
Date: 2007-05-07 15:19:53 + (Mon, 07 May 2007)
New Revision: 22748
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=22748
Log:
fix memleaks by passing an mem_ctx to
irpc_servers_byname()
metze
Modified:
branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/auth/auth_winbind.c
Author: metze
Date: 2007-05-07 15:27:50 + (Mon, 07 May 2007)
New Revision: 22749
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=22749
Log:
fix memory leak of nbt_name_request structure which are used to send replies
and never have an async callback that could free
Author: jelmer
Date: 2007-05-07 15:29:25 + (Mon, 07 May 2007)
New Revision: 22750
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=22750
Log:
dlopen() is always available now (and returns a correct error if not supported
by the system), thanks to libreplace.
Author: vlendec
Date: 2007-05-07 15:31:12 + (Mon, 07 May 2007)
New Revision: 22751
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=22751
Log:
Next step for the cluster merge: sessionid.tdb should contain a 'struct
server_id' instead of a 'uint32 pid'
Modified:
Author: metze
Date: 2007-05-07 15:43:40 + (Mon, 07 May 2007)
New Revision: 22752
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=22752
Log:
bail out on talloc failure
metze
Modified:
branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/wrepl_server/wrepl_scavenging.c
Changeset:
Author: jelmer
Date: 2007-05-07 16:15:59 + (Mon, 07 May 2007)
New Revision: 22753
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=22753
Log:
Ignore generated files
Modified:
branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/lib/ldb/man/
Changeset:
Property changes on:
Stefan (metze) Metzmacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Author: derrell
Date: 2007-05-07 03:02:24 + (Mon, 07 May 2007)
New Revision: 22731
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=22731
Log:
- Fix bug #4594.
Author: jra
Date: 2007-05-07 19:27:46 + (Mon, 07 May 2007)
New Revision: 22754
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=22754
Log:
When processing a string, ensure we don't write one past
the terminating NULL if we've already processed the null
in iconv.
Author: vlendec
Date: 2007-05-07 20:53:10 + (Mon, 07 May 2007)
New Revision: 22755
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=22755
Log:
Second half of r22754. As it stands now, string_replace expects a
pstring. Give it one, although I hate putting it in :-)
URL: http://build.samba.org/
--- /home/build/master/cache/broken_results.txt.old 2007-05-07
00:00:54.0 +
+++ /home/build/master/cache/broken_results.txt 2007-05-08 00:00:59.0
+
@@ -1,25 +1,25 @@
-Build status as of Mon May 7 00:00:02 2007
+Build status as of Tue May
Author: abartlet
Date: 2007-05-08 04:38:16 + (Tue, 08 May 2007)
New Revision: 22756
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=22756
Log:
Make it easier to setup an LDAP replica. Provision with
--partitions-only (suggestions for a better name welcome) will
89 matches
Mail list logo
