On a lan with a linux samba server and several win XP pro machines,
how can I make the samba server always be the `Master Browser'?
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
On Friday 06 July 2007, Darin wrote:
> [backup2$]
> path = /archive
> read only = No
> guest only = Yes
> guest ok = Yes
>
> [backup$]
> path = /archive
> read only = No
> guest only = Yes
> guest ok = Yes
Don't know if it matters or
I found a solution for this, but I don't understand why this made a
difference.
First, here's output from testparm:
testparm
Load smb config files from /usr/local/etc/smb.conf
Processing section "[backup2$]"
Processing section "[backup$]"
Loa
> Links?
http://freshmeat.net/projects/gosa/
> Linux Guy wrote:
> > Any comments on gosa for management?
> > Looks pretty.. Haven't tried it yet though. :)
You'd probably get more by asking on the gosa mailing list.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instru
Links?
Linux Guy wrote:
Any comments on gosa for management?
Looks pretty.. Haven't tried it yet though. :)
--
Oliver Schulze L. | http://tinymailto.com/oliver
Asuncion - Paraguay | http://www.solojuegos.mobi
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alan Hodgson wrote:
> On Friday 06 July 2007 07:24, "Gerald (Jerry) Carter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> Alan Hodgson wrote:
>>> However, when I try to Connect to the printer from the Vista 64 bit
>>> machine, all I get is "Windows cannot connect t
On Friday 06 July 2007 07:24, "Gerald (Jerry) Carter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Alan Hodgson wrote:
> > However, when I try to Connect to the printer from the Vista 64 bit
> > machine, all I get is "Windows cannot connect to the printer.
> > Operation could not be completed (error 0x06f7)".
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
> Nope. You haven't looked at how much trouble this would
> be in the code. For example, Lookupsid() *always* returns
> the sAMAcountName but LookupName() will resolve a UPN to
> the same SID.
>
> So The conversion is a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jerome Haltom wrote:
> Okay, I agree then. There are a set of standard ways of representing a
> user name on a domain. There is 'NT\username', there is
> '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'. And there is 'username'.
>
> Is it so bad to think that [EMAIL PROTECTED] sh
Okay, I agree then. There are a set of standard ways of representing a
user name on a domain. There is 'NT\username', there is
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'. And there is 'username'.
Is it so bad to think that [EMAIL PROTECTED] should be desired? I desire it
because I have non-Windows related things that us
Le Wednesday 04 July 2007 09:30:29 Francesco Tonucci, vous avez écrit :
> Hello,
> I'm trying to join a samba server to a w2k domain.
> Now I have removed all samba and kerberos software from the machine to
> reset configuration.
> Then I have executed "net ads testjoin" to see what happened (I hav
Thanks! That did the trick!
On Thu, 5 Jul 2007 23:42:36 +0200
Guenter Kukkukk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 5. Juli 2007 22:38 schrieb Michael Powell:
> > [...snip...]
> > As for the problem... on the OS/2 box, the shares on the debian box are
> > displayed (just as the shares on
On Fri, 2007-07-06 at 21:05 +0200, Bernd Schubert wrote:
> Hello Rune,
>
> On Friday 06 July 2007 20:41:05 Rune Tønnesen wrote:
> > Bernd Schubert skrev:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> >
> > Hi Bernd
> >
> > mc (Midnight Commander) most likely caches usernames and groups. mc
> > needs the usernames when tje us
On Friday 06 July 2007 21:43:36 simo wrote:
> winbindd enum users = no
> winbindd enum groups = no
Ah, thats enumeration, thanks a lot, that did the trick. Though, the manpage
suggests that it might cause strange effects to some programs. I disabled it
for now, lets see if it has side effects.
On Friday 06 July 2007 21:41:54 Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
> Bernd Schubert wrote:
> > Hello Rune,
> >
> > On Friday 06 July 2007 20:41:05 Rune Tønnesen wrote:
> >> Bernd Schubert skrev:
> >>> Hi,
> >>
> >> Hi Bernd
> >>
> >> mc (Midnight Commander) most likely caches usernames and groups. mc
> >
On Fri, 2007-07-06 at 14:40 -0500, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Jerome Haltom wrote:
> > Would it be much work to add some sort of format string policy to
> > smb.conf to govern this mapping?
> >
> > winbind user name = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bernd Schubert wrote:
> Hello Rune,
>
> On Friday 06 July 2007 20:41:05 Rune Tønnesen wrote:
>> Bernd Schubert skrev:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>> Hi Bernd
>>
>> mc (Midnight Commander) most likely caches usernames and groups. mc
>> needs the usernames when tje use
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jerome Haltom wrote:
> Would it be much work to add some sort of format string policy to
> smb.conf to govern this mapping?
>
> winbind user name = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> winbind group name = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> This would ideally allow lookups for al
Hello Rune,
On Friday 06 July 2007 20:41:05 Rune Tønnesen wrote:
> Bernd Schubert skrev:
> > Hi,
> >
>
> Hi Bernd
>
> mc (Midnight Commander) most likely caches usernames and groups. mc
> needs the usernames when tje user wants to change ownership of files and
> directories. You can properly get t
Would it be much work to add some sort of format string policy to
smb.conf to govern this mapping?
winbind user name = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
winbind group name = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This would ideally allow lookups for all of the various possibilities to
resolve to the single canonical name.
On Fri, 2
Bernd Schubert skrev:
Hi,
on a customer system samba/winbindd is used for windows and unix
authentication.
I just tuned searches of the ldap backend to speedup by factor 20-200 and
slapd now doesn't seem to be the bottleneck anymore.
Don't know how well the windows authentication now works, si
Hi,
on a customer system samba/winbindd is used for windows and unix
authentication.
I just tuned searches of the ldap backend to speedup by factor 20-200 and
slapd now doesn't seem to be the bottleneck anymore.
Don't know how well the windows authentication now works, since this is
presently do
Hi
I have got Samba 3.0.20 installed on two AIX servers, one running 5.2
and one running 5.3. I only get a core dump when manipulating users on
the 5.3 machine ? The code install is actually an exact copy that I
tarred up and transferred over. I actually seem to get a lot of errors
on the 5.3 serv
I am having a problem with my samba 3 machine. It is a member of an NT 4
domain. A trust was recently formed between the AD server and the NT4
PDC, and resulted in the NT server rejecting the Samba servers
credentials. When the trust is broken, the samba server works. How do I
fix this proble
Gianluca,
What happens if you use
valid users = DMSWARE\%S
In my setup I have set posix directory permissions to 740, owned by
DOMAIN\:DOMAIN\"Domain Users", and set valid users as shown above.
Dale
Gianluca Culot wrote:
Hello list
I've a problem giving exclusive access to home directory
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jerome Haltom wrote:
> I have a domain member system which has domain users. For instance, ISI
> \jhaltom. This user is a member of a local group "admin", by virtue of
> being in the /etc/group file on the line for admin. If I log into the
> user (usin
On Friday 06 July 2007 04:09, Corey Johnston wrote:
> Anybody have any ideas on what the problem may be?
There are two different versions of drivers for Win2K and XP. Normally these
are referred to as version 2 and version 3. I believe, while Win2K and XP
support both versions, I believe Vista
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jerome Haltom wrote:
> I'd like my canonical Unix names to be of the form [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Is there anyway to accomplish this? I'd also like NSS to lookup all the
> various variations and return that canonical representation.
There's a pending patc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
George Farris wrote:
> What doesn't work.
>
> 1) Local accounts - can't get Samba to authenticate a local account.
>
> Are local accounts possible in this situation?
net use * \\servers\share /user:MACHINE\localusername
cheers, jerry
==
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alexandru Ionut Munteanu wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have the following error when I try to use smbclient with
> windows 2000 & anonymous access :
This is a Windows issue and not an smbclent bug.
Just give smbclient valid credentials.
cheers, jerry
==
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jerome Haltom wrote:
> I would like to have winbind map all of my AD users to their full
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] form on the Linux domain members. I'd like lookups to be
> properly canonical. Is this possible?
No. But I go have a patch pending that does
Hello all,
My Windows XP client successfully logon to Samba server.
The Samba server generates automatically a logon script, but my client does
not download it and run it automatically.
Do I need some special setup of my Windows client or something with Samba
server setup is not OK
[global]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matt Baker wrote:
> It was my hope that the round robin dns would be expanded and Samba
> would retry the other servers in the DNS lookup. I can see now this does
> not work (although I'd like confirmation of this if possible).
IIRC what's happening
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alan Hodgson wrote:
> However, when I try to Connect to the printer from the Vista 64 bit machine,
> all I get is "Windows cannot connect to the printer. Operation could not be
> completed (error 0x06f7)".
>
> Any help would be appreciated.
My
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
smlacc1 leador wrote:
> We have identified a problem joining samba to a windows 2003 rc2 domain.
> Using mit kerberos 1.5, and the latest version of samba (3.0.25b), net join
> ads would throw up the error:
>
> cli_rpc_pipe_open: cli_nt_create failed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Eddie Tse wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Using samba 3.0.25b, testing to join to a Windows 2008 domain using ADS
> security with kerberos and it doesn't seem to work. Anybody else tried
> this combination?
There's a few huckups that we're working on with Longhorn
Hi all,
It seems to have happened again.
Here's some sample log entries:-
[2007/07/06 14:24:33, 1, pid=6128] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(950)
212.219.219.243 (212.219.219.243) connect to service favorites initially as
user tjowett (uid=1860, gid=270) (pid 6128)
[2007/07/06 14:
Andy, you're a genius. I tried it with a different card (VIA Rhine
VT86C100A), and sure enough, it works like a charm.
It appears that I am not the only one who has had this problem with the
ASUS onboard ethernet controller (Realtek RTL8111/8168B PCI Express
Gigabit Ethernet). By now, I have f
Hello there
I've just upgraded our Samba server to 3.0.25b and am still having
problems with Windows Vista clients accessing printers. XP/2000
clients continue to work fine - but Vista refuses to connect to Samba
printers that have drivers hosted on the Samba server.
To clarify, as part of the n
Hello list
I've a problem giving exclusive access to home directory to the user owning
it via Samba 3.0.24
I've setup access and user authentication and setup the share as follow
[Home]
path = /home
#valid users = %S
valid users = "@DMSWARE\domain users"
Each home dir
40 matches
Mail list logo
