Quoting Gerald (Jerry) Carter ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
==
==
== Subject: Boundary failure when parsing SMB responses
== can result in a buffer overrun
==
== CVE ID#:
John H Terpstra wrote:
On Wednesday 28 May 2008 16:21:45 Richard Foltyn wrote:
Hi group,
after having read the browsing chapters in both the Samba HOWTO and in
Using Samba, I'm still not sure about browsing and two Samba PDCs on
the same subnet.
If both PDCs are DMBs and LMBs for their
I did just that and it seems to work. WINS has no understanding of the
domain security context, as I see it, and simply maps netbios names
(including service descriptors) to IP addresses.
So having two PDCs in WINS will result in something like
DOMAIN11c
DOMAIN21c
and there is no conflict.
Hello folks,
It seems that I am still having the trust issues I encountered with 3.0.28a
with 3.0.30.
My production servers are running 3.0.28 and that is working very well.
Thanks in advance for any help or advice.
- Franz
Basic setup:
Win NT4 PDC domain trusts an AD-mixed mode accounts
Hi,
Java 1.4 and 1.6 are capable of disabling the java cache.
In windows configuation panel, goto Java.
On the Tab General, click below Temparary Internet Settings on Settings
here you can disable the caching.
Java 1.5 ( aka 5 ) does not have this option.
Louis
-Oorspronkelijk
Small suggestion.
Get this http://www.jam-software.com/freeware/TreeSizeFree.zip
Tree Size, go find out how big your profile on you pc is.
then check the size on the profile folder of the user.
these should be about the same.
if not, Logon the server, cleanup the profile of the users.
backup
Hi,
i have running samba with ldap as a PDC. The PDC works fine, except
adding new computer to the domain. The Computer how was added 2-3 Years
ago works fine, but i cannot add new PCs to the domain.
The samba log says to remove the paramtere 'algorithmic rid base' and
use 'net groupmap
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 07:20:38PM +1000, Evan Koutsandreou wrote:
i was wondering how a ctdb samba (or IBM SOFS) solution provides full NTFS
ACLs support?
Samba can use the NFSv4 ACLs that a filesystem might
provide. These are really close to NTFS ACLs. GPFS does so.
- Is there a specific
Hello Jerry, list,
Could someone please provide a bit more information regarding this
vulnerability, in terms of what configurations are affected?
Everything I could find on Secunia and in the message below tells me that
vulnerable are the cases when smbd acts as a client - what are they?
Hi -
i was wondering how a ctdb samba (or IBM SOFS) solution provides full NTFS
ACLs support?
- Is there a specific vfs module which must be loaded? etc...
I am in the process of designing a very large fileserver within an Active
directory domain.
I have seen a SOFS presentation on the
Hello Jerry, list,
Could someone please provide a bit more information regarding this
vulnerability, in terms of what configurations are affected?
Everything I could find on Secunia and in the message below tells me that
vulnerable are the cases when smbd acts as a client - what are they?
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
My apologies...
I was reporting some spam, and typed too fast, so matched on sam (which
matched this list) instead of 'spam'...
--
Best regards,
Charles
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Hello,
I did join 2 sites using an IPSEC tunnel, and made one domain trust the
other (2 small Samba DC based domains with about 10 users in each)
I first had resolving issues until I decided to keep only one WINS server
for both networks (though this is still an issue to me because if for any
Hi everyone,
since I upgraded to samba 3.0.29 the parameter write list does no longer
work.
Anyone else who has same experience?
Best regards,
Sascha
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Rubin Bennett schrieb:
On Thu, 2008-05-29 at 10:21 +0200, David Böhm wrote:
Hi,
i have running samba with ldap as a PDC. The PDC works fine, except
adding new computer to the domain. The Computer how was added 2-3 Years
ago works fine, but i cannot add new PCs to the domain.
The samba
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 6:34 AM, Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Gerald (Jerry) Carter ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
==
==
== Subject: Boundary failure when parsing SMB responses
== can result in a buffer
On Thu, 2008-05-29 at 15:21 +0200, David Böhm wrote:
Rubin Bennett schrieb:
On Thu, 2008-05-29 at 10:21 +0200, David Böhm wrote:
Hi,
i have running samba with ldap as a PDC. The PDC works fine, except
adding new computer to the domain. The Computer how was added 2-3 Years
ago
Not sure if this is what I'm looking for but if it's possible with samba,
I'd appreciate pointers at the correct documentation.
We've got a bunch of filespace shared out onto our samba server from
a fileserver that doesn't support ACLs, we're stuck using basic rwxr-x
type permissions.
Each
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alexander,
Hello Jerry, list,
Could someone please provide a bit more information
regarding this vulnerability, in terms of what
configurations are affected?
It is in the client SMB response parsing for a specific
SMB op. There are many
On 5/29/2008, L.P.H. van Belle ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Clean up internet cache and temperary files.
These are in the 'Local Settings' folder, which is, by default, NOT part
of a roaming profile, so is irrelevant...
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
Yeah, I'm baffled by the relationship between domain trusts and WINS.
There's some sort of weird dependency there that I can't figure out.
lmhosts doesn't seem to help much either.
If you have WAN-linked domains with multiple segments (like most
medium-to-large businesses) you want to have a WINS
Hi,
Trusting domain: DOMA
Trusted domain : DOMB
We are running samba-winbind 3.0.24 and have problems when
authenticating user from a trusted domain (DOMB) (idmap backend = ad) in
to DOMA.
After some investigations, we found that when we are trying to login as
a user from DOMB, it seems that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I gather that this should work . Does anyone have any
experiences from this ? I have seen some questions
before regarding this while googling around but no answers.
This is a limitation of the idmap_ad pliugin
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 03:10:27PM +0200, Gong 96.3 [Sascha Bieler] wrote:
Hi everyone,
since I upgraded to samba 3.0.29 the parameter write list does no longer
work.
Anyone else who has same experience?
More specific examples of the problem please.
Jeremy.
--
To unsubscribe from this
I'm working on getting Samba3 running in a RHEL4 environment. The
components are;
samba3-3.0.28-35
openldap-2.2.13-8.el4_6.4
smbldap-tools-0.9.4-1.el4.rf
I already have a working and functional ldap installation. The rub is
that the existing ldap accounts do not have any samba specific
On Thursday 29 May 2008 11:18:51 Gar Nelson wrote:
I'm working on getting Samba3 running in a RHEL4 environment. The
components are;
samba3-3.0.28-35
openldap-2.2.13-8.el4_6.4
smbldap-tools-0.9.4-1.el4.rf
I already have a working and functional ldap installation. The rub is
that the
Another alternative from /home, as root;
# how big are the profile directories
du --max-depth=2 | grep profile | sort -nr
# where are the big offenders?
du --max-depth=3 | grep profile | more
I agree with the java cache being a likely suspect if Application Data
is still being loaded via the
John H Terpstra wrote:
On Thursday 29 May 2008 11:18:51 Gar Nelson wrote:
So here's the question: If I perform step 3 of Procedure 5.8 in Chapter
5 of the online Samba by Example (smbldap-populate -a root -k 0 -m 0) am
I going to screw up my existing accounts, or will this politely add the
smbd version 3.0.25b-0.4E.5
Our server was functioning very well for several months. Our SAN crapped
out and the LUN the server was using was gone. Everything is back up except
SAMBA is acting crazy.
I am looking at the logs and I am getting
/var/log/samba/winbindd.log
winbindd: Exceeding 200
Jason Greene wrote:
smbd version 3.0.25b-0.4E.5
Our server was functioning very well for several months. Our SAN crapped
out and the LUN the server was using was gone. Everything is back up except
SAMBA is acting crazy.
I am looking at the logs and I am getting
/var/log/samba/winbindd.log
Which log do you want output from? The samba logs didn't change when I ran
that.
here are the results
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# netstat -s
Ip:
82262 total packets received
0 forwarded
0 incoming packets discarded
58038 incoming packets delivered
48287 requests sent out
Icmp:
I reinstalled Samba and that cleared up the issue. Thanks for the response.
Jason
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 12:56 PM, Scott Lovenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Jason Greene wrote:
smbd version 3.0.25b-0.4E.5
Our server was functioning very well for several months. Our SAN crapped
out and
I take it back... winbind is taking 99% of the CPU again
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 1:34 PM, Jason Greene [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I reinstalled Samba and that cleared up the issue. Thanks for the
response.
Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
I'm trying to build and install Samba 3.0.30 on a Solaris 9 SPARC machine.
When I do a make test, the RW1 test is failing. If I go back and
configure and build 3.0.28 with the same settings, and do a make test,
everything passes. Here's what I'm seeing with 3.0.30:
---8---
Testing RW1 (0)
On 5/29/2008, Gar Nelson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I agree with the java cache being a likely suspect if Application
Data is still being loaded via the roaming profile.
Yeah, I don't know why they don't default that to the Local Settings
folder... dumb...
--
Best regards,
Charles
--
To
Quoting Nick Boyce ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
(please keep applause for the moment we will upload the fixed packages
for etch. I haven't done this yet...3.0.30 is in unstable now, though)
Just wondering - given all the improvements (particularly Vista
compatibility) made since 3.0.24 - does anyone
Jason Greene wrote:
I take it back... winbind is taking 99% of the CPU again
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 1:34 PM, Jason Greene [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I reinstalled Samba and that cleared up the issue. Thanks for the
response.
Jason
Could you provide
John H Terpstra wrote:
On Tuesday 27 May 2008 05:45:24 pm Daniel L. Miller wrote:
OK, payment in advance: :-) :-) :-)
Wait a minute, let me change currencies
Awe .. forget it! ;-)
I'm assuming my last payment still has me covered - if you need more
retainer please let me
Is there anything wrong with the samba website? I have not been able to
get to it all day though other web pages load up on my machine just
fine.
Just wondering.
Marc Taylor
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Taylor, Marc wrote:
Is there anything wrong with the samba website? I have not been able to
get to it all day though other web pages load up on my machine just
fine.
Little of of /.'ing going on. WOrking on it.
jerry
-BEGIN PGP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
Taylor, Marc wrote:
Is there anything wrong with the samba website? I have not been able to
get to it all day though other web pages load up on my machine just
fine.
Little of of /.'ing going on. WOrking on it.
I recently installed Fedora 9 for use as a squid server. We use smb_auth
basic authorization and have run into a problem with it. I believe that I
have tracked the problem down to smbclient when the USER environmental
variable contains the userid and password. smb_auth.sh in squid uses the
USER
I ran into a problem today which surprised me, and after two hours of
reading and testing I am more confused than ever, so I feel the need
for a sanity check. It would be good to have a clear and authoritative
article about this somewhere; I thought it would be in either Using
Samba or in the
Andras S. Haramasz wrote:
Hi,
Since I'm UNIX boy myself here is what I did
Say a user belongs two mpim (management) and mpir (research) and perhaps a
third one too mpig(generic)
Management share
ls -latd /mpi/Management
drwxrws--- 36 root mpim 4096 2008-05-27 21:34 /mpi//Management
ls -latd
The branch, v3-2-stable has been updated
via 6ae47b413df591b8a6f887f7d925d5a270921139 (commit)
via a6de68eabac2ecd9537098af96c3e33add3e1cee (commit)
via fd8051f86000c9f4f2ccc293a71c0d92aa4c86bd (commit)
via 22cc3c2a688f104688273dd5f7ae751182953bba (commit)
The branch, v4-0-test has been updated
via a6f59b1c7a81c7be4e9f83786fc4e1f454e6df0f (commit)
via 24ae9a55ec326807afd8d5bfa0a422a6668bd7c3 (commit)
from 88c9200b7802954ce8aac82901ab7aec1fa8330a (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v4-0-test
- Log
The branch, v3-0-test has been updated
via 8f076ca8538df1fe7bba1e3c5497076141849e8c (commit)
from 749178f44ea9a065120478ff1df44a932e45ec37 (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v3-0-test
- Log -
The branch, v4-0-test has been updated
via 3b1f5d10360ed1b26980d748a7c9be6db5977bd3 (commit)
from a6f59b1c7a81c7be4e9f83786fc4e1f454e6df0f (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v4-0-test
- Log -
The branch, v3-2-stable has been updated
via f70be5ab57e19e831a5cecd08f930b187cef5a72 (commit)
from 6ae47b413df591b8a6f887f7d925d5a270921139 (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v3-2-stable
- Log
The branch, v4-0-test has been updated
via 3947327f8c4ca530d99bc5ac3d1f6f54727f477a (commit)
via c823cfadb0b20a0782fc4a8a0b63dcb9116f82be (commit)
from 3b1f5d10360ed1b26980d748a7c9be6db5977bd3 (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v4-0-test
- Log
The branch, v4-0-test has been updated
via 6b202d3780f8ff50e0bdfa4a749c43b5639e4880 (commit)
via 064e9ddb3786bd7df8785b39754b1e6674496b66 (commit)
via c338269b4b9f2bf4d3386880c1d733a8e47e2c8d (commit)
from 3947327f8c4ca530d99bc5ac3d1f6f54727f477a (commit)
The branch, v3-3-test has been updated
via 41e20becf3b976656f60aaec9175df329803b012 (commit)
from 23b825e9d2c74c5b940cf4d3aa56c18692259972 (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v3-3-test
- Log -
The branch, v3-2-test has been updated
via 8bfedcdfd2cf6bd98a9b2040242e7cc9f31294ab (commit)
from 353d9cb0fdd941781698c6b334db5f2997eef991 (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v3-2-test
- Log -
The branch, v3-0-test has been updated
via 0e407e77ad5af4bb78b1e6da247398f2677618ee (commit)
from 8f076ca8538df1fe7bba1e3c5497076141849e8c (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v3-0-test
- Log -
The branch, v3-3-test has been updated
via e7f76a0c65085dd1e7b50ea3537e11922e7d9ecd (commit)
from 41e20becf3b976656f60aaec9175df329803b012 (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v3-3-test
- Log -
The branch, v3-2-test has been updated
via 8fce305e47aefdcad8e20d51851d8a3734508f00 (commit)
from 8bfedcdfd2cf6bd98a9b2040242e7cc9f31294ab (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v3-2-test
- Log -
Author: deryck
Date: 2008-05-29 21:48:38 + (Thu, 29 May 2008)
New Revision: 1195
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=samba-webrev=1195
Log:
Don't use the us1 mirror for now due to a slashdotting
issue with that server.
Will be reverted when this passes.
The branch, v4-0-test has been updated
via d335fd11637f5e138b08a5e0fcf54b19cef9a646 (commit)
via a6d28e2b330a20e95b745966bb5eb153bdc58ed1 (commit)
via c50e7a15f9a7f2c5821b5ee468f9ade6eaa0ed55 (commit)
via e728596eec2157eefb1fe72789284567f3880388 (commit)
via
Author: deryck
Date: 2008-05-29 21:58:35 + (Thu, 29 May 2008)
New Revision: 1196
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=samba-webrev=1196
Log:
Revert previous change.
We're splitting the traffic between us1 and dp
for the time being.
Modified:
URL: http://build.samba.org/
--- /home/build/master/cache/broken_results.txt.old 2008-05-29
00:00:33.0 +
+++ /home/build/master/cache/broken_results.txt 2008-05-30 00:00:08.0
+
@@ -1,22 +1,22 @@
-Build status as of Thu May 29 00:00:02 2008
+Build status as of Fri May
The branch, v4-0-test has been updated
via 89fc39f7edb214065aff461bc225f41443eae3c7 (commit)
via cd10b381765f9146f22f5cf23f0ef5f6a65e804d (commit)
via df8c0bb8f9367b425080a43ed6f1d3384dde340b (commit)
from d335fd11637f5e138b08a5e0fcf54b19cef9a646 (commit)
The branch, v4-0-test has been updated
via c0322e8e27d67655b7498b27df0829aa5682a345 (commit)
from 89fc39f7edb214065aff461bc225f41443eae3c7 (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v4-0-test
- Log -
The branch, v4-0-test has been updated
via 7646574411b753794f1b8712612a91940407f8d7 (commit)
from c0322e8e27d67655b7498b27df0829aa5682a345 (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v4-0-test
- Log -
The branch, v4-0-test has been updated
via df8399ba9dee9d1c706a3e56451c9f2cade96dae (commit)
from 7646574411b753794f1b8712612a91940407f8d7 (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v4-0-test
- Log -
The branch, v4-0-test has been updated
via 2b5acb5e95b46dd39c6f54b5bb7e15ddb180f7ec (commit)
via e2fa3788110698cd3340dfed8acd36744a27a5e5 (commit)
from df8399ba9dee9d1c706a3e56451c9f2cade96dae (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v4-0-test
- Log
66 matches
Mail list logo
