Hi Everyone ,
I'm planning to mount na OpenLDAP+Samba server to authenticate windows
machines, but I have a not so common situation. I have windows machines that
does not belong either to some windows domain or workgroup, machines that
belongs to some workgroup and meny machines that belongs to so
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:06:06PM -0500, Taylor Lewick wrote:
> Hi all. I've set up a test SuSe 10.2 linux machine that is
> authenticating against our active directory. Right now we just create
> users in AD, and then they can login to the unix box and using
> pam_mkhomedir. We don't add users
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 09:25:41AM -0400, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Aiko Barz wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > what is the GID of an Active Directory user?
> >
> > a) Is it the GID, you can see within the Active Directory UNIX Tab?
>
> Set "winbind
Hi,
I'm using smbldap-groupadd to add groups for my PDC, and the default
group type is domain group. The problem is, if I do an ldapsearch of
groups created in this fashion, I don't see the memberUid's of the users
that belong to this group.
if I don't use the default, I can do an ldapsearch
Thanks to Volker Lendecke for providing a fix for my issue. The answer is:
./configure --enable-cups=no ...
Happy Friday Eve (or whatever the proper day is for your TZ)!
Stu...
Stuart Reedy wrote:
The saga continues: I still can't get Samba 3.0.30 to use the "print
command"
I did a clean in
Scott Lovenberg wrote:
>> Have you set the smb.conf setting 'csc policy'? Is it that you want
>> and/or need offline files, or would you rather do without it? I've
>> found it to mostly be a pain, FWIW.
> Oops; John beat me by a few minutes. Listen to what he has to say; he
> wrote the book on
Scott Lovenberg wrote:
Russell Curtis wrote:
Hi Guys
It saddens me to say so, but I'm going to have to order a copy of
Windows Server unless I can get this issue of offline files resolved.
Basically, we have a problem when users have "Offline Files" enabled
in Windows XP. When they log off,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Aiko Barz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> what is the GID of an Active Directory user?
>
> a) Is it the GID, you can see within the Active Directory UNIX Tab?
Set "winbind nss info = {sfu,rfc2307}" depending on your supported
schema
> b) Is it the GID of the prim
On Thursday 26 June 2008 05:05:40 Mark H. Wood wrote:
> I'm setting up a new domain with Samba 3.0.30 as the PDC using the
> tdbsam backend. 'net group' yields an empty list, which is consistent
> with the cautious appoach that Samba takes: don't do anything
> automagically. But, a new Windows P
Russell Curtis wrote:
Hi Guys
It saddens me to say so, but I'm going to have to order a copy of
Windows Server unless I can get this issue of offline files resolved.
Basically, we have a problem when users have "Offline Files" enabled
in Windows XP. When they log off, create or modify a file
My actual server is a Samba-3 PDC with a non-LDAP backend, using
smbpasswd. It has users shares and profiles on it.
Migrating from a old server to a new server what steps?
- Keep users and machines (copy smbpasswd file to new server? useradd
and groupadd again?)
- Keep profile and share permis
On Thursday 26 June 2008 03:47:06 Russell Curtis wrote:
> Hi Guys
>
> It saddens me to say so, but I'm going to have to order a copy of
> Windows Server unless I can get this issue of offline files resolved.
>
> Basically, we have a problem when users have "Offline Files" enabled in
> Windows XP. W
Hi,
what is the GID of an Active Directory user?
a) Is it the GID, you can see within the Active Directory UNIX Tab?
b) Is it the GID of the primary windows group?
So long,
Aiko
PS.: Using sernet-samba-3.0.28-21 on Debian.
--
:wq ✉
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--
To unsu
On Thursday 26 June 2008, Russell Curtis wrote:
> surely this should work out of the
> box?
I'm sure it would if the protocols had been open and published all these
years instead of closed and proprietary.
--
Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instruct
On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 01:33 -0600, Trever L. Adams wrote:
> Good day,
>
> I wasn't sure whether this should go to the user list or the
> samba-technical list. I chose here based on the descriptions of the list.
>
> Forgive me if my understanding of the naming is inaccurate. It is my
> understandi
On Fri, 2008-06-13 at 12:59 -0600, Trever L. Adams wrote:
> Well, Samba 4 so, if it has an internal (I think that has been
> abandoned, but not certain) then that, OpenLDAP or Fedora DS will be
> the
> backend. I am leaning toward Fedora DS, but I am not certain and will
> accept suggestions.
I
On Fri, 2008-06-20 at 16:21 +0200, Christophe Thibault wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to setup Samba 4 alpha 4 with OpenLDAP.
It is best to mail questions about Samba4 to the samba-technical list
while we are still in alpha, as I don't watch this list very often.
> I'm following this wiki page
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 07:43:07AM -0400, Stuart Reedy wrote:
> The saga continues: I still can't get Samba 3.0.30 to use the "print
> command"
>
> I did a clean install of Slackware 11, then compiled Samba 3.0.30 from
> source using:
>
> ./configure
> make
> make install
>
> I set up a printe
The saga continues: I still can't get Samba 3.0.30 to use the "print
command"
I did a clean install of Slackware 11, then compiled Samba 3.0.30 from
source using:
./configure
make
make install
I set up a printer, replaced lp with a script that writes its command
line to a file, and set:
p
Did you create NT passwords for the local users with smbpasswd -a?
Also, why is your security setting on share? That seems a bit odd for
AD integration.
--Ryan
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 6:06 AM, alex.blackbit
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> hi,
>
> my smb.conf looks like this:
>
>...
>
I'm setting up a new domain with Samba 3.0.30 as the PDC using the
tdbsam backend. 'net group' yields an empty list, which is consistent
with the cautious appoach that Samba takes: don't do anything
automagically. But, a new Windows PDC will come online with several
well-known domain users and g
hi,
my smb.conf looks like this:
...
security = share
update encrypted = yes
encrypt passwords = no
...
/etc/pam.d/samba:
#%PAM-1.0
auth required pam_nologin.so
auth required pam_stack.so service=system-auth
Hi Guys
It saddens me to say so, but I'm going to have to order a copy of
Windows Server unless I can get this issue of offline files resolved.
Basically, we have a problem when users have "Offline Files" enabled in
Windows XP. When they log off, create or modify a file, and then log
back on
23 matches
Mail list logo