hi,
I would like to know how should I test the RECVFILE functionality? I've been
trying to test the splice and expect to see that smbd would at least try
splice and fails maybe? But I found that my data path isn't going through the
vfswrap_recvfile, which calls sys_recvfile and splice.
I
Hi All,
We have a fileserver set up with Fedora 9 and Samba 3.2.0-17.fc9.
Among other things on this server are numerous video files, which we
are fine with sharing to the rest of the network via copy-and-run, but
not directly streaming. Is there any way using Samba to detect
whether a copy is
Hi all,
My samba server is executed under a software which control if samba is
life.
The software use some scripts which made the control and verify if process
exist.
If the process not exist or have a problem, the software restart the
application ( in this case : samba)
sometimes I see
I can find into nmbd.log :
[2008/09/03 10:50:32, 1] lib/util_tdb.c:tdb_log(682)
tdb(unnamed): tdb_open_ex: /var/lib/samba/unexpected.tdb (26626,162113)
is already open in this process
[2008/09/03 10:50:32, 1] lib/util_tdb.c:tdb_log(682)
tdb(unnamed): tdb_open_ex:
Hi,
I can use 'addriver' from rpcclient to add a cups printer, but addprinter
reports (in samba logs) :
rpc_server/srv_spoolss_nt.c:spoolss_addprinterex_level_2(7725)
spoolss_addprinterex_level_2: add printer for printer [LaserJet_3330_MF]
called and nosmb.conf parameter addprinter command is
On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 11:40:43AM -0800, James Zuelow wrote:
I created a test samba install with nothing but the base
Lenny packages + Samba/Kerberos, joined my production
domain and it exhibits the same behavior.
Can you run winbind under valgrind --tool=memcheck, and send
all winbind log
Hello.
Before starting to write such a thing myself, I'm asking whether it
already exists.
What I want is the ability to give a non-technical admin the ability to
change passwords for any user.
This web page will obviusly be protected and only accessible to him.
The thing should be as
On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 05:54:02AM -0600, Har Gagan Sahai wrote:
This is happening in our specific Active Directory setup.
It is reaching this path finally and overwriting the
builtin domain. This is causing the dump later. We have a
bug raised in Novell on this issue (bug #292609, not sure
Am 03.09.2008 um 11:51 schrieb Andrea Venturoli:
Hello.
Before starting to write such a thing myself, I'm asking whether it
already exists.
What I want is the ability to give a non-technical admin the ability
to change passwords for any user.
This web page will obviusly be protected
Hi Guys,
Advise, I have 200 users, they all have access to 20 shares in different
combinations. They all have their own netlogon scripts... its a management
nightmare,
is there a way to create a universal netlogon script that I can include all
the shares to mount and it will silently fail on the
i suggest go use kixscript
here is a small example.
connecting printers
If INGROUP (dwangb_pr) = 1## if member of
dwangb_pr
CONNECTPRINTER(PDC,rol) ## connect printer
rol from server PDC
If INGROUP (dwangb_pr_def) = 1
http://www.archivum.info/linux.samba/2008-06/msg00486.html
http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2008-June/141457.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/samba@lists.samba.org/msg91781.html
Brad C wrote:
Hi Guys,
Advise, I have 200 users, they all have access to 20 shares in different
combinations.
Hello Brad,
If you are in linux/unix try a root preexec when the users login there
home directories.
Example:
[home]
root preexec=/your Path to/your script %U.
In this script make a directory for all the links(if it does not
exist).In it make a ln -s
for all other directories that the user
Brad C wrote:
Hi Guys,
Advise, I have 200 users, they all have access to 20 shares in different
combinations. They all have their own netlogon scripts... its a management
nightmare,
is there a way to create a universal netlogon script that I can include all
the shares to mount and it will
On 9/3/2008 9:04 AM, Brad C wrote:
Hi Guys,
Advise, I have 200 users, they all have access to 20 shares in different
combinations. They all have their own netlogon scripts... its a management
nightmare,
is there a way to create a universal netlogon script that I can include all
the shares
I am a bit surprised by the behaviour of Samba user permissions (security =
user) - although in fact it produces exactly what I want! Can I confirm it
is correct, and ask one question?
I have one class of shares (private) which I want only specified users to
access. And another class which I
Hi,
is there a way to anonymously connect a Windows client to a Samba PDC? I
have some random clients which I currently don't want to add to the domain,
but would still like them to have access to one share.
For example, I have:
[skener]
path = /var/spool/scanner/scans
browseable
Morning,
I'm using the samba that came with my Fedora Core 5. I'm starting to get
core dumps in the smbd process and think I need to recompile the latest
samba code specifically for my samba box. Is there a way to get a list
of compiler flags from the daemons so I can compile the same way? The
Here's mine, been working great for years also. Pretty involved, does
lotsa stuff. :) Inserts stuff in databases, installs software, modifies
registry entries...
Much if this won't be of use to you, but dynamically mapping shares by
group might be.
...and yes people, I know I'm an awful VB
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 4:37 PM, dfirth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had thought that user security needed to match the users actual user name
and password in windows. So I was surprised by this behaviour.
This is not correct. security = user only means that users
authenticate themselves by
On Wednesday 03 September 2008 09:43:14 Richard Foltyn wrote:
Hi,
is there a way to anonymously connect a Windows client to a Samba PDC? I
have some random clients which I currently don't want to add to the domain,
but would still like them to have access to one share.
For example, I have:
On Wednesday 03 September 2008 10:00:56 Mike Eggleston wrote:
Morning,
I'm using the samba that came with my Fedora Core 5. I'm starting to get
core dumps in the smbd process and think I need to recompile the latest
samba code specifically for my samba box. Is there a way to get a list
of
After uploading samba source and uncompress the tar files.
got o samba-3.x.x\source and call ./configure --help
You will got all parameter for compiling samba.
---
Stéphane PURNELLE [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Service Informatique Corman S.A.
Hello,
I am new on this list and I hope, my question is not an FAQ. I did a lot
of searching but could not get the answer:
With ntbackup on a windows 2003 server I try to backup 6 shares on a
server running samba 3.0.24. When I select all 6 shares for backup I get
an access denied-error from
On Wed, 03 Sep 2008, John H Terpstra might have said:
On Wednesday 03 September 2008 10:00:56 Mike Eggleston wrote:
Morning,
I'm using the samba that came with my Fedora Core 5. I'm starting to get
core dumps in the smbd process and think I need to recompile the latest
samba code
Thanks a lot, once again.
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 5:15 PM, John H Terpstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In your smb.conf [global] section add:
map to guest = bad user
- John T.
--
John H Terpstra
Don't do as I do; Show me better! - Anonymous.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the
Hello all,
I am having an issue that I need help with and have been searching the
web high and low for a solution. It involvs using winbind to
authenticate Linux systems against a 2003 Active Directiry domain with a
one-way trust. Here is the lay out.
Domain ABC is the resource domain where
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brad C wrote:
Hi Guys,
Advise, I have 200 users, they all have access to 20 shares in different
combinations. They all have their own netlogon scripts... its a management
nightmare,
is there a way to create a universal netlogon script that I
Hi,
One way is to install the src rpm and then check for the file in the
/usr/src/Redhat/SPECS dir.
BRGDS,
Bruno Guerreiro
-Original Message-
From: Mike Eggleston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: quarta-feira, 3 de Setembro de 2008 16:25
To: John H Terpstra
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 08:56:54PM -0700, Sudheer Kurichiyath wrote:
Hi Jeremy,
I experienced this problem with Samba versions samba-3.0.23c and
3.0.28-0.el5.8.
Thanks and Regards
Latest releases are 3.0.32 and 3.2.3, can you check with those please.
I think your bug is already fixed.
On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 02:04:53PM +0800, Lin Mac wrote:
hi,
I would like to know how should I test the RECVFILE functionality? I've been
trying to test the splice and expect to see that smbd would at least try
splice and fails maybe? But I found that my data path isn't going through
Perhaps this is relevant? I temporarily allowed file and print sharing
connections from the local subnet on the saf01 workstation, then did:
% smbclient -L saf01 -U 'saf01/Administrator%(password)'
Domain=[SAF] OS=[Windows 5.1] Server=[Windows 2000 LAN Manager]
(SNIP - shares were shown
On Tuesday 02 September 2008 06:27:56 pm David Mathog wrote:
The smb.conf was not modified.
Maybe it should have been. Not a good idea to upgrade without carefully
reading all of the release notes between versions. Defaults do change.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL
Some progress following these actions:
saf01 workstation: changed domain SAF - Workgroup WORKGROUP
SMB server: smbpasswd -x -m saf01
smbpasswd -a -m saf01
saf01: reboot
changed workgroup WORKGROUP - domain SAF
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dr. Harry Knitter wrote:
Hello,
after a total crash of hardware, we had to reconstruct our Samba PDC from
tape.
Since the old installation was already pretty old (SuSE 10.0) we moved to
Debian etch.
I did the following.
I migrated the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
LiuYan 刘研 wrote:
OS: CentOS 5.2
Samba: Samba 3.0.28-1.el5_2.1
Printer: HP LaserJet P2105n
I setup a linux print server for windows clients.
First I downloaded the printer drivers for
The command can be executed manually on the command line, but then when I
attempt to join the domain I receive the error of Access Denied and
nothing is in the error logs then.
On Tue, 2 Sep 2008 07:45:17 +0200, Volker Lendecke
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 10:26:05PM -0600,
The server is a WINS server, and I tried adding the server IP to the
Advanced/WINS tab and I have the same problem.
Any other ideas?
On Tue, 2 Sep 2008 06:14:55 -0500, Mike Eggleston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 01 Sep 2008, Greg Koch might have said:
I recently setup a new server with
Samba 3.0.28a (from CentOS 5.2) would not allow me to add my new domain
controller to the domain that it was supposed to be controlling. I
uninstalled 3.0.28a and installed the 3.0.31 version (which was current at
that time).
After the upgrade, I was able to join the domain with out difficulty.
I had 3.0.28a but when I attempt to install from yum the most current
version it supplies is 3.0.28-1.el5_2.1. I realize it is a different
package, but it didn't seem to solve my issue. Any help with getting yum
to give me a more current version, or other ideas to solve this issue?
On Wed, 3
OK
Thanks.
But I note that when trying to access shares that have authorised users,
windows either gives you no option to enter a user (not accessible), or if
it does, it will not accept a username and password that matches one of the
authorised users.
Richard Foltyn wrote:
Hi,
On Wed,
The branch, v3-devel has been updated
via 9c4905ed6703a38ff72be5990a036d0a79aebb9f (commit)
from b57cbf62e8180c8fdb8f541c43358d36d8dbbdfa (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v3-devel
- Log -
The branch, v3-devel has been updated
via 32cb45c962c822bd79a7d0f666f2f6037060b324 (commit)
from 9c4905ed6703a38ff72be5990a036d0a79aebb9f (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v3-devel
- Log -
The branch, v4-0-test has been updated
via 3862f3132549332e0a44fad65d7c49a27e1dbd4a (commit)
from 82fcd7941f5c54da2d994c8bd99dd8d86299a296 (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v4-0-test
- Log -
The branch, v3-devel has been updated
via 74c8575b3f3b90ea21ae6aa7ccd95947838af956 (commit)
via 8e4dca3b9416d9b5e535bda5e4befc073bfc1641 (commit)
via e038f1cf9fb305fc1e7a4189208e451d30aaa1f0 (commit)
via 8594edf666c29fd4ddf1780da842683dd81483b6 (commit)
from
The branch, v3-3-test has been updated
via e1d4db8f55b25c7e9c408cb334fb89ccfd4c6565 (commit)
from 06442555c2a99c5efd70326337d991e5bd410734 (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v3-3-test
- Log -
The branch, v3-3-test has been updated
via de8f483254ec59c7cf678d8c03e07c0c241f6d7b (commit)
from e1d4db8f55b25c7e9c408cb334fb89ccfd4c6565 (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v3-3-test
- Log -
The branch, v3-2-test has been updated
via bfced01a92ae1a4913c0c9aba27e7b43e06f9032 (commit)
from 11fdeeeb551ac3287b75e114b15bc4f76cf2d337 (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v3-2-test
- Log -
The branch, v3-0-test has been updated
via 0b39c04fed2720aad07544c65a57b6580ae322a0 (commit)
from 09145720b510647e7c24e3062a4a1246cc7bff5b (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v3-0-test
- Log -
The branch, v3-devel has been updated
via ad462e2e2d025a7fc23e7dea32b2b442b528970b (commit)
from 74c8575b3f3b90ea21ae6aa7ccd95947838af956 (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v3-devel
- Log -
Sorry I pushed this by mistake, so I reverted :-(
On Wed, 2008-09-03 at 13:37 -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
The branch, v3-devel has been updated
via ad462e2e2d025a7fc23e7dea32b2b442b528970b (commit)
from 74c8575b3f3b90ea21ae6aa7ccd95947838af956 (commit)
The branch, v3-devel has been updated
via 4f2de29723bb7e588e6c9440649b57d56d10b587 (commit)
from ad462e2e2d025a7fc23e7dea32b2b442b528970b (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v3-devel
- Log -
The branch, v3-3-test has been updated
via 5349a1d373fb186cff1031077199070db2b6db90 (commit)
from de8f483254ec59c7cf678d8c03e07c0c241f6d7b (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v3-3-test
- Log -
The branch, v3-2-test has been updated
via 96b5e691149c449253e4875a743c8603b3298c2b (commit)
from bfced01a92ae1a4913c0c9aba27e7b43e06f9032 (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v3-2-test
- Log -
The branch, v3-0-test has been updated
via f3d604ab72173c9d51661f3b696b0f25da602226 (commit)
from 0b39c04fed2720aad07544c65a57b6580ae322a0 (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v3-0-test
- Log -
The branch, v4-0-test has been updated
via 1897cef508c8bea817c510bd9023d794cb983864 (commit)
via d5c61f470d7aa6dd0e5a22e8718d53a69cbbc239 (commit)
from 3862f3132549332e0a44fad65d7c49a27e1dbd4a (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v4-0-test
- Log
The branch, v4-0-test has been updated
via e8ba65c4db986fcedf7008d05d8f8846f78a98f1 (commit)
from 1897cef508c8bea817c510bd9023d794cb983864 (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v4-0-test
- Log -
URL: http://build.samba.org/
--- /home/build/master/cache/broken_results.txt.old 2008-09-03
00:00:10.0 +
+++ /home/build/master/cache/broken_results.txt 2008-09-04 00:00:28.0
+
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-Build status as of Wed Sep 3 00:00:02 2008
+Build status as of Thu Sep
The branch, v4-0-test has been updated
via c273d63f94c430a4f553085efb0d6e31a99e5853 (commit)
via f008c3b6ee324056fd9b63f6151ad6849640c959 (commit)
via 25171f18a4b242b5a731f4ac1eefc51cc82efd74 (commit)
via cf37126ac7b833a3a739b151157c296afc0c979c (commit)
from
Hi Simo,
The msync manpage reports that msync *must* be called before
munmap. Failure to do so may result in lost data. Fix an ifdef
check, I really think we meant to check HAVE_MMAP here.
Please revert this change immediately. That change would slow down tdb
by a couple of
Hi Simo,
Please revert this change immediately. That change would slow down tdb
by a couple of orders or magnitude for our temporary databases.
actually this will only slow us down each time we attach/detach to the
tdb or we expand it (as expand uses munmap/mmap). I guess the question
is how
Hi Simo,
and please check with somebody who knows systems programming before
making a change like this.
also, my apologies for this. Kai and Andrew have now pointed me at the
thread where you asked about this, and got an ack from Jeremy.
It seems I'm not getting samba-technical email at the
62 matches
Mail list logo
