-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 04, 2008 4:41 AM
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] Nmbd is using the wrong ip address as source
Teodor Iacob wrote:
Hello,
I have a
Dave,
I went through the same process that you did, for the same reason if I
understand you right - I wanted to have one central user database for
authenticating both Windows clients and Linux (ie. posix) clients. My
(Samba/Posix) LDAP server is implemented on Hardy Xubuntu and I use the
Hello. I have a 3.2.3 Samba-LDAP PDC which shares the database with heimdal (so
samba passwords are also kerberos passwords). I am able to use kerberos
credentials to connect to the PDC shares with smbclient -k, both on the
server and linux workstations.
The problem is that, as soon as I try to
Hi all,
I'm currently in the process of testing Samba 3.2.1.x compiled for
Solaris 10 x86, because there are some issues I have found with the
default Sun supported 3.0.28a that I am trying to resolve.
In the process of attempting to run up 3.2.1.x, I have found that when
I issue an
Hi Remy,
Thanks for the reply. This was just a trivial example, but yes - I
have it set up as nge1, as it stands, as this is the particular
interface I use for filesharing tasks.
I've also tried specifying an IP address and mask with the interfaces
= directive, to no avail.
Any extra
I'm currently in the process of testing Samba 3.2.1.x compiled for
Solaris 10 x86, because there are some issues I have found with the
default Sun supported 3.0.28a that I am trying to resolve.
In the process of attempting to run up 3.2.1.x, I have found that when I
issue an
Hi all,
We are currently upgrading some core infrastructure and authentication
hosts (Mac OS X 10.4.11 Open Directory/OpenLDAP/KDC -- 10.5.5). We've
run into an interesting snag however.
The Sun host that we use for sharing out files over Samba 3.0.28a
(Sun's currently shipped, supported
1. is acl supported now on reiserfs filesystems by default?
2. do i have to recompile the kernel and apply the acl patch? (i currently
have the 2.6.17 kernel)
3.which is best for samba?xfs?ext3? or reiserfs?
This is probably best asked of the Mandriva folks. I run Mdv here but
not with
From what I'm reading, in 3.2 you need to have the
SePrintOperatorPrivilege in order to install drivers. Is there anyway
around this to allow certain users/groups to install without requiring
the privilege? I've tried using the printer admin option, but it
doesn't seem to have any effect.
Thanks
Running Samba 3.2.3 on Debian Lenny, amd64.
I'm joined to an AD realm, authentication works fine for Windows
clients. I'm able to see that the clients are using Kerberos, not NTLM
to authenticate to the shares. However when I look at the keytab, my
entries have the short names like service/[EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jake Carroll wrote:
Hi Remy,
Thanks for the reply. This was just a trivial example, but yes - I have
it set up as nge1, as it stands, as this is the particular interface I
use for filesharing tasks.
I've also tried specifying an IP address
I'm wondering if anyone has run across that and MUCH more importantly, if
the data can be recovered somehow.
I'll put as much details as I can at the bottom but here's the gist of the
problem:
I added my wives computer (which contains 8 years worth of pictures) to the
domain. When I logged into
This seems to be related to this entry on the list in 2004-2005. As
far as I see, the issue was never fixed. This is a pretty big issue if
it is indeed the same bug as it effectively stops *nix clients from
using Kerberos authentication.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ryan Bair wrote:
This seems to be related to this entry on the list in 2004-2005. As
far as I see, the issue was never fixed. This is a pretty big issue if
it is indeed the same bug as it effectively stops *nix clients from
using Kerberos
Jerry,
Thanks for the feedback. In this instance, what specific log would you
like to see? Would you like me to turn samba log verbosity up? As for
compiling myself, no, I was given this binary set by a friend who is,
in theory at least, running on identical hardware and an identical
Hi all,
I'm currently attempting to compile Samba 3.2.4 for Solaris 10 x86. I
require krb5 support and I realised that it would not look in the
correct default location, under Solaris 10.
Example, from ./configure --help:
--with-krb5=base-dirLocate Kerberos 5 support (default=/usr)
Jesse Stone wrote:
I'm wondering if anyone has run across that and MUCH more importantly, if
the data can be recovered somehow.
I'll put as much details as I can at the bottom but here's the gist of the
problem:
I added my wives computer (which contains 8 years worth of pictures) to the
Jake Carroll wrote:
Hi all,
I'm currently attempting to compile Samba 3.2.4 for Solaris 10 x86. I
require krb5 support and I realised that it would not look in the
correct default location, under Solaris 10.
Example, from ./configure --help:
--with-krb5=base-dirLocate Kerberos 5
Jake Carroll wrote:
Hi all,
I'm currently attempting to compile Samba 3.2.4 for Solaris 10 x86. I
require krb5 support and I realised that it would not look in the
correct default location, under Solaris 10.
Example, from ./configure --help:
--with-krb5=base-dirLocate Kerberos 5
Scott,
Thanks for the link. I had a poke around, substituting my paths et al
with the instructions here, and, unfortunately, it still just doesn't
seem to see my krb libraries. I am wondering if there is something
generically _wrong_ with Solaris/Sun shipped Krb that samba doesn't
like?
The branch, master has been updated
via 0e0371b78a8d445cd0a08bd102a9a2c4952c235f (commit)
from af9dc6381da52c686d797a54d69b486214000cb5 (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log -
commit
The branch, master has been updated
via 87f496f3c1ff5c8fd72bcfb6b4af7cb539d5bc47 (commit)
from 0e0371b78a8d445cd0a08bd102a9a2c4952c235f (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log -
commit
The branch, master has been updated
via 9eea6929e3420a0035ec3c0e3f1b4dd24847bbfa (commit)
from 87f496f3c1ff5c8fd72bcfb6b4af7cb539d5bc47 (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log -
commit
The branch, master has been updated
via 80665a0b5abbdd8df735e1ccdab3206399beba0b (commit)
from 9eea6929e3420a0035ec3c0e3f1b4dd24847bbfa (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log -
commit
The branch, master has been updated
via e44369989c54e908e3481fb76444df6bcf4e228b (commit)
via ba5ef49f831dbbfec1a360cd4644999de822e2bc (commit)
via 025ff92f59512fd530f4f68306fea77b26061682 (commit)
via e13270d7ac1b8d1a85e67e3b84ca9bfdf88aa0cd (commit)
from
The branch, master has been updated
via fe67306fc626333da4f03f6f2a823de9cc2b6cc2 (commit)
from e44369989c54e908e3481fb76444df6bcf4e228b (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log -
commit
URL: http://build.samba.org/
--- /home/build/master/cache/broken_results.txt.old 2008-10-04
00:00:15.0 +
+++ /home/build/master/cache/broken_results.txt 2008-10-05 00:00:55.0
+
@@ -1,22 +1,22 @@
-Build status as of Sat Oct 4 00:00:02 2008
+Build status as of Sun Oct
The branch, v3-3-test has been updated
via 09d76244a1e3eeeb1396a707e78325320e4e4f9e (commit)
via 2a4bf6cc1f7f20b9c95e4166b366990ed330604e (commit)
via d1c213b23649172ed684a22d3095f5ac95685dac (commit)
via ab37affd6edec0d80109a7b635bc7fdb3b84eb6b (commit)
from
The branch, v3-2-test has been updated
via 52365077e74e80959a42aa82cf9a6c959e2fcda5 (commit)
via 65169e4b5f182f1614e102bb0e09326a26bd5b5d (commit)
via de581efedbc53a783a680ff366d37aeccd14ee23 (commit)
from 4dc2eb7f42bad6812d21bf4577e2901b04a5ca83 (commit)
The branch, master has been updated
via de5edb1d0c0d60b337d2cbb7151db47d31bfa8d4 (commit)
from fe67306fc626333da4f03f6f2a823de9cc2b6cc2 (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log -
commit
30 matches
Mail list logo
