Hey,
It seems that samba client could be used to back up Windows files. Am
I right?
To achieve this, I apt-get installed samba and set up it accordingly.
Below is my smb.conf file
/*==Begin=*/
[global]
workgroup = HWWKM
os level = 65
preferred master =
JJB wrote:
> Dale Schroeder wrote:
>> I don't know if you've solved this or not, but have you checked the
>> acl's with getfacl. (I noticed all the "inherit acl" statements.)
>> I once had this problem, and it was caused by the creation of default
>> acl's that overrode all other permissions. Sinc
tisdn tisdn wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We've had a problem using Samba 3.3.2 and windows 2000 workstations sp4.
> After many tests, it was discovered that when the netbios name has an hyphen
> the windows 2000 workstations don't see the groups on the samba domain, but
> when the name is changed for one with
Dale Schroeder wrote:
I don't know if you've solved this or not, but have you checked the
acl's with getfacl. (I noticed all the "inherit acl" statements.)
I once had this problem, and it was caused by the creation of default
acl's that overrode all other permissions. Since I did not create
the
when you specify the netbios name dikrective have you tried enclosing
the server netbios name in quotes when using a hyphen?
tisdn tisdn wrote:
Hi,
We've had a problem using Samba 3.3.2 and windows 2000 workstations sp4.
After many tests, it was discovered that when the netbios name has an hyp
Hi,
We've had a problem using Samba 3.3.2 and windows 2000 workstations sp4.
After many tests, it was discovered that when the netbios name has an hyphen
the windows 2000 workstations don't see the groups on the samba domain, but
when the name is changed for one without hyphen the error doesn't oc
First let me say thanks to the Samba team for all time and effort you have put
forward.
Now I do not have a problem per se but am going to be testing some of the Alpha
versions with respect to Ubuntu. I am interested in testing policies in
particular but before I go through and do that I am cur
Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 11:19:58AM +0900, OPC oota wrote:
>> Samba-3 can act as a Backup Domain Controller (BDC) to another Samba Primary
>> Domain Controller (PDC). A
>> Samba-3 PDC can operate with an LDAP account backend. The LDAP backend can
>> be either a common mast
Tim Evans wrote:
BeefStu BeefStu wrote:
All:
I am running on an AIX 5.3 platform and I am looking to see if
anybody has a script similar to this (see below) that will work under
AIX.
My goal is, on boot up I want to have samba started automatically.
Can somebody let me what I have to
Hey, I upgraded samba from 3.2.4 to 3.2.8. Now all home dir permissions are
showing owned by UID instead of user names. Has anyone had this issue? How
to fix and prevent..?
~LA
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/opti
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 11:19:58AM +0900, OPC oota wrote:
> Samba-3 can act as a Backup Domain Controller (BDC) to another Samba Primary
> Domain Controller (PDC). A
> Samba-3 PDC can operate with an LDAP account backend. The LDAP backend can be
> either a common master LDAP
> server or a slave s
BeefStu BeefStu wrote:
All:
I am running on an AIX 5.3 platform and I am looking to see if anybody has a
script similar to this (see below) that will work under AIX.
My goal is, on boot up I want to have samba started automatically. Can somebody
let me what I have to do (on AIX) for t
We just have a script like this:
VERSION=`ls /opt/pware/samba|sort|tail -n 1`
/opt/pware/samba/${VERSION}/sbin/nmbd -D
/opt/pware/samba/${VERSION}/sbin/smbd -D
Which is called in /etc/inittab to start up Samba on boot ... nothing fancy :-)
-Original Message-
From: samba-bounces+claus
All:
I am running on an AIX 5.3 platform and I am looking to see if anybody has a
script similar to this (see below) that will work under AIX.
My goal is, on boot up I want to have samba started automatically. Can somebody
let me what I have to do (on AIX) for this to happen.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gentlefolk,
I have a machine name collision issue on our 2008 DC and a samba domain
member machine got kicked off AD, but did not do an official "net ads
leave". We have worked it out that the samba 3.0.x machine will change
its name, but want to cau
Release Announcements
=
This is the first release candidate of Samba 3.4. This is *not*
intended for production environments and is designed for testing
purposes only. Please report any defects via the Samba bug reporting
system at https://bugzilla.samba.org/.
Major enhance
As you probably realilse, the two separate areas are what samba requires in
ldap and what Linux requires - it's likely that you've only populated the
samba required stuff.
Think of ldap like a /etc/passwd file with many more columns. You only have
the columns for samba but most of the Linix/POSIX
To add a bit more, my users typically look like:
dn: uid=a103,ou=People,ou=csim,dc=cs,dc=ait,dc=ac,dc=th
objectClass: inetOrgPerson
objectClass: posixAccount
objectClass: top
objectClass: sambaSamAccount
cn: a103
sn: x
uid: a103
uidNumber: 5072
gidNumber: 95
homeDirectory: /home/a103
loginShel
Hi,
> Executing "getent group" on the Ubuntu client produces the expected results.
> Executing "getent passwd" does not; it only shows me a subset of the user
> accounts (notably, not my own account which was created prior to migration).
I am running successfully with the user accounts having the
Hello list! I believe I may not have a Samba problem, but rather an LDAP
directory problem. I'm hoping to be redirected towards a more appropriate
mailing list to which I can post.
I have a Slackware server running Samba and OpenLDAP, and my WinXP clients
authenticate just fine. I migrated from an
Hi List
Thanks for all the help. I found a solution. The solution was for to use
"force user". Now shared files are owned by the same user and this
solves my permissions problem.
Thanks for the help
Regards,
Dennis
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructi
21 matches
Mail list logo
