Have you tried following the steps on
http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Windows7 ?
3.4.1 is really known to work as long as you do not start to modify your
netlogon registry settings.
Guenther
Hi Guenther!
I followed Joss instructions ...
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTE
In the smb.conf manpage, there is a notation used, (G) or (S) for global or
share.
Does (S) mean it can only be used in a Share section (i.e. - will be ignored
in the global section), or is that they *can* be applied at the share level,
and, possibly set a default in the 'G'lobal section?
exam
> The problem I'm experiencing is that I'm unable to authenticate to the
> share and thus browse it.
What do you mean by 'authenticate to the share'? Normally you only
authenticate with a server.
> As far as the basics, the server is joined successfully to the domain
> and I can browse to it fro
Hey folks,
I've got a server setup that uses samba to join to the Windows 2k3
Active Directory. I've also created a shared folder on that server.
The problem I'm experiencing is that I'm unable to authenticate to the
share and thus browse it.
The smb.conf file is:
==
[global]
workgroup =
s
You shouldn't need to define a domain, sshusers should be sufficient. Did you
restart sshd?
Andrew Philipoff
Infrastructure Coordinator
Information Systems
Department of Medicine, UCSF
From: samba-boun...@lists.samba.org [samba-boun...@lists.samba.org] On
On the windows box, it doesn't display an error, it just shows the
username and password prompt
again.
The samba log for the windows box is attached. I am noting that the
student is correctly trying to log
in using the STUDENT\Username form to identify that he belongs to the
student do
Thanks Andrew,
The file didn't have the line = accountrequired pam_stack.so
service=system-auth
so changed it to the following, group's name in AD is domain\sshusers btw so
I'm not sure if I have to input it as domain\sshusers or sshusers. But
doesn't seem to work... What did I do wrong
> [2009/09/14 17:35:14, 1] smbd/sesssetup.c:reply_spnego_kerberos(316)
> Failed to verify incoming ticket with error NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE!
I think this means that when the client sent Samba the kerberos ticket
(to prove it had authenticated) Samba was unable to verify it with the
server that
> Thank you very much, I'm quite surprised the messenger service is not
> running on the clients of that LAN, but I take it and check ASAP.
The service is turned off on all our PCs, so I'm not sure if that's just
our environment or the default. Since there's no authentication it
could cause a lo
You can restrict access to specific local and domain groups:
#accountrequired pam_stack.so service=system-auth
accountsufficient pam_succeed_if.so user ingroup users
accountsufficient pam_succeed_if.so user ingroup webdevelopers
Check here for more info:
http://linux.die.net/m
All files/dirs are 666 or 777. According to my reading, since there are
no POSIX extended ACLs, if the VFS layer "passes" an access, then it only
should be compared against the standard UGO permissions.
That's correct - but the problem isn't access, it's when the
incoming ACL is "set" o
Hi all,
I'm using samba with winbind which has been integrated with Active
Directory.
In the smb.conf file, I have
template shell = /bin/bash
winbind use default domain = yes
to allow ssh but I don't want all the domain users to be able to ssh.
Is there a way to only allow for example) domain\ss
Chris Osicki wrote:
Hi
I'm using Samba 3.0.33 on Solaris10 and have the following problem.
In the smb.conf I have
workgroup = CORPROOT
security = domain
and users authenticated to CORPROOT domain can connect shares
w/o problems, [homes] for example.
Now I would like to create a shar
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 07:20:11PM +0100, Miguel Medalha wrote:
>
> All files/dirs are 666 or 777. According to my reading, since there are
> no POSIX extended ACLs, if the VFS layer "passes" an access, then it only
> should be compared against the standard UGO permissions.
That's correct - but
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 06:01:04PM +0100, andy.m...@bt.com wrote:
> Cheers Volker
>
> I used your option and I've also found the password server option in the
> smb.conf. Im running both and seem to have got a bit further.
>
> But now I'm getting a different error. I'm not sure if the problem is
This is a simple problem, I'm sure, but it's stumped me so far.
I am using Samba version 2.2.3a on an IBM AIX server and I need to
create a new share and cannot find how to do that from the documentation
I have.
The shares I have were set up by a person that is no longer employed
with us an
On Tue, 15 Sep 2009, Jeff Layton wrote:
> Yow, that version of mount.cifs is really old. I wonder if it may be
> passing bad mount options to the kernel? Might be interesting to strace
> that. Something like:
>
> # strace -f -s 256 -e mount mount -t cifs //chiprodfs2/company /mnt
> -ouser=clamete
64 bit one--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
On Thu, 10 Sep 2009, Jeff Layton wrote:
> In any case, I think we need to look closely at what's happening at
> mount time. First, I'll need some other info:
>
> 1) output of "/sbin/mount.cifs -V" from both machines
The 32 bit machine
#/sbin/mount.cifs -V
mount.cifs version: 1.5
mount -t cifs /
John H Terpstra - Samba Team wrote:
Of over 100 LADP Samba installation I have completed over 80%
successfully use:
uid='username',ou=People,ou=Users,
uid='machine',ou=Computers,ou=Users,
Same here, though I use
uid='username', ou=people,
cn='machine', ou=hosts,
and make the object str
Hello,
A problem that might be usefull to mention (or not).
Sometimes, I encountered a problem with some stations that couldn t
join the samba domain.
It was due to the wins cache. (the samba conf was configured to
provide wins service)
I had already joined the domain with those stations be
On Wednesday 16 September 2009 08:46:31 am Bruno Steven wrote:
> Hi guys ...
> I have samba Version 3.0.33-3.7.el5_3.1 integrated with Openldap I have
> trying run the command *net rpc join -U root , * but show message
> Creation of workstation account failedUnable to join domain TEST.COM.
...
H
Chris Osicki wrote:
Hi
I'm using Samba 3.0.33 on Solaris10 and have the following problem.
In the smb.conf I have
workgroup = CORPROOT
security = domain
and users authenticated to CORPROOT domain can connect shares
w/o problems, [homes] for example.
Now I would like to create a shar
Dear Jeremy
Since I once thought about doing the same, I would like to know your
views on the method that Wes describes.
I quote:
ยป
What I've been doing, which is dangerous but effective, is setting
file creation mode to 666 and letting the Samba VFS ACL layer take care of
everything. That
Hi
I'm using Samba 3.0.33 on Solaris10 and have the following problem.
In the smb.conf I have
workgroup = CORPROOT
security = domain
and users authenticated to CORPROOT domain can connect shares
w/o problems, [homes] for example.
Now I would like to create a share and restrict access t
Hi,
I am trying to get two Samba4 domain's linked in a trust over an openvpn tunnel.
Everything seems to be setup fine and each domain recognizes the other domain
when starting to create the trust. I am unable to get this to work though as
when I go through the wizard and it creates the trust, the
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 01:38:13PM -0400, Wes Deviers wrote:
>
> Or, alternately, "Does Samba, with vfs object = acl_xattr, store ACLs both as
> a user_xattr AND an ext3 ACL at the same time?" My limited testing shows
> that
> *not* to be the case, but I'm certainly not the expert.
Yes it doe
On Wednesday 16 September 2009 12:56:11 pm Jeremy Allison wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 11:18:58AM -0400, Wes Deviers wrote:
SNIP
> >
> > How can I insist that Samba use the vfs object ACL module, instead of the
> > POSIX acls?
>
> You can't at the moment. Samba still requires the incoming
>
Also found in the debug output the following
[2009/09/16 18:20:09, 8] libsmb/namequery.c:(1644)
get_sorted_dc_list: attempting lookup for name FGPREPROD.COM (sitename
NULL) using [ad
s]
Which I'm guessing is where its getting the:
Bad option: ads
Failed to join domain: Invalid parameter
Erro
Cheers Volker
I used your option and I've also found the password server option in the
smb.conf. Im running both and seem to have got a bit further.
But now I'm getting a different error. I'm not sure if the problem is
still DNS.
The ADS server is not in DNS and in a different domain to my SAMB
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 11:18:58AM -0400, Wes Deviers wrote:
> List,
>
> I had Samba 3.0 running on Debian Lenny configured to use POSIX ACLs on ext3.
>
> They worked fine, or at least as fine as NT -> POSIX mapping ever did. After
> testing 3.3 with acl_xattr on using a different machine, I
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 03:10:38PM +0100, andy.m...@bt.com wrote:
> Hi Samba people
>
> I'm trying to join a Solari10 server using Samba Version 3.0.33 server
> to an ADS. But the ADS is not in DNS.
>
> I thought I could get round this by putting the ADS IP in the servers
> local hosts file, and
We had a server crash last night and now the print queues (from the
Windows clients) are not clearing after the job prints. I'm using Samba
version 3.0.26a-0.9-1787-SUSE-SLES9 and CUPS cups-1.1.20-108.44. I'm
thinking I've got a corrupt tdb file but not sure which one(s) to check.
Advice / sug
Hi Martin,
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 01:37:33PM +0200, Martin Hochreiter wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I read many threads and tried many "solutions" but
> I can't get Win7 (RTM, 64 bit) and Samba 3.4.1 to work together.
>
> I am still failing with the "trusteeship" problem during
> the first logon after domain
List,
I had Samba 3.0 running on Debian Lenny configured to use POSIX ACLs on ext3.
They worked fine, or at least as fine as NT -> POSIX mapping ever did. After
testing 3.3 with acl_xattr on using a different machine, I decided to give it a
whirl on the production server. And yes, I know it'
Hi Samba people
I'm trying to join a Solari10 server using Samba Version 3.0.33 server
to an ADS. But the ADS is not in DNS.
I thought I could get round this by putting the ADS IP in the servers
local hosts file, and telling the krb5.conf not to use dns but it
doesn't seem to work.
1. Can it be
Hi guys ...
I have samba Version 3.0.33-3.7.el5_3.1 integrated with Openldap I have
trying run the command *net rpc join -U root , * but show message
Creation of workstation account failedUnable to join domain TEST.COM.
The content my /var/log/messages
Sep 15 09:32:08 amblivre smbd[4163]: [2009/
Hi!
I read many threads and tried many "solutions" but
I can't get Win7 (RTM, 64 bit) and Samba 3.4.1 to work together.
I am still failing with the "trusteeship" problem during
the first logon after domain join.
Is there a working solution?
regards
Martin
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to
38 matches
Mail list logo
