Re: [Samba] Force Winbind Domain

On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 1:36 PM, Diego Lima wrote: > Hi all, > > Is there any way to force Winbind to auhenticate against a certain > domain even if another was specified? I'm currently having problems > authenticating some users on squid as they seem to inform the wrong > domain. I can see messa

Re: [Samba] Samba PDC with group using same desktop

On 03/30/2010 08:54 AM, M. D. wrote: > My goal is to have a business with multiple locations, all have the same > desktop for a certain user group. The quick Launch programs, Start Menu > and Desktop icons should all be the same, and be 'read only' -- meaning > they can't change them. > > I'm usin

[Samba] Samba PDC with group using same desktop

My goal is to have a business with multiple locations, all have the same desktop for a certain user group. The quick Launch programs, Start Menu and Desktop icons should all be the same, and be 'read only' -- meaning they can't change them. I'm using ClearOS for the PDC, and I have it working alre

[Samba] Force Winbind Domain

Hi all, Is there any way to force Winbind to auhenticate against a certain domain even if another was specified? I'm currently having problems authenticating some users on squid as they seem to inform the wrong domain. I can see messages like these on my cache log: Login for user [proxy1]\[userna

Re: [Samba] AD Auth Trusted Domain issues

The trust check succeeded... I have attached the pertinent logs... it looks like it is timing out... I am not sure why though. The link should be a little slower but it shouldn't be terrible, it is a 2Mb pipe. mailtestbed:~# wbinfo -t checking the trust secret via RPC calls succeeded On 3/30/201

Re: [Samba] Samba SMB throughput

> In that test I did see >700 megabytes per second, certainly > over 10GbE on pretty powerful hardware. One of those raw tcp > throughput testers showed the hardware does around 800 > megabytes per second. The trick was to read from a huge RAM > disk together with a well-tuned smbclient from 3.2 t

Re: [Samba] security = share

Le 30/03/2010 12:09, Cassian Braconnnier a écrit : Le 29/03/2010 21:54, Jeremy Allison a écrit : On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 09:45:06PM +0200, Cassian Braconnier wrote: Hi, in "Using Samba" by G. Carter, J Ts and R. Eckstein, 3rd edition, on chapter 5, page 113, I ses that the security = share opt

Re: [Samba] Mess-Windows dumbness...

At Tue, 30 Mar 2010 11:57:28 -0400 awill...@whitemice.org wrote: > > On Tue, 2010-03-30 at 11:48 -0400, Robert Heller wrote: > > I changed the Samba security mode from share to user and added a couple > > of users to allow some writable shares. Now the MS-Windows machines are > > insisting on a

Re: [Samba] Mess-Windows dumbness...

At Tue, 30 Mar 2010 11:48:21 -0400 Robert Heller wrote: > > I changed the Samba security mode from share to user and added a couple > of users to allow some writable shares. Now the MS-Windows machines are > insisting on a username/password to access the *anonymous* (guest ok = > yes) printers

Re: [Samba] Mess-Windows dumbness...

On Tue, 2010-03-30 at 11:48 -0400, Robert Heller wrote: > I changed the Samba security mode from share to user and added a couple > of users to allow some writable shares. Now the MS-Windows machines are > insisting on a username/password to access the *anonymous* (guest ok = > yes) printers and t

[Samba] Mess-Windows dumbness...

I changed the Samba security mode from share to user and added a couple of users to allow some writable shares. Now the MS-Windows machines are insisting on a username/password to access the *anonymous* (guest ok = yes) printers and the one read-only public file system. How do I fix this? Do I *h

Re: [Samba] AD Auth Trusted Domain issues

Hello, Thank you so much for your reply! We are using AD 2003 R2 on both the domain and the child domain. I am using 1-2 for IDs on the main domain (RDOMAIN) and 3-10 on the child domain (KID). Interestingly, in the Unix tab (in AD Users and Computers for any object) under "NIS D

Re: [Samba] Samba & (anonymous) LDAP Authentication

Unix and Windows/Samba servers both store passwords in a one-way encrypted format. So when you authenticate to a server, you type in your password, the server encrypts it and compares it to the encrypted version it has it is password database.This is is important since your encrypted p

Re: [Samba] ham,Re: Samba / Lucid / Windows 7 problem

On 03/29/2010 4:52 PM, David Harrison wrote: On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 9:09 AM, Dale Schroeder > wrote: On 03/29/2010 6:38 AM, Torkil Svensgaard wrote: On 2010-03-24 02:10, David Harrison wrote: Here is my smbldap-tools configuratio

Re: [Samba] Samba SMB throughput

On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 08:59:06PM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote: > Mahmud Siddiqi put forth on 3/29/2010 5:40 PM: > > Hello everyone, > > > > Quoting from Samba Team Blog #2 (25 Sept 2009): > > > > "Volker showed how to get more than 700MB/sec from Samba using > > smbclient and a modern Samba serve

Re: [Samba] Veto files with question mark

On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 12:49:57PM +0200, OmBreNoiRe wrote: > Good idea ! But it didn't work... > I tried /Icon^M/ and /Icon\\^M/ and /Icon\^M/ and / Icon[^M]/ none of > these is working (^M was made with ctrl-V + ctrl-M) > Is it an hopeless situation ? I think so, yes, at the moment. Please fil

Re: [Samba] Veto files with question mark

Good idea ! But it didn't work... I tried /Icon^M/ and /Icon\\^M/ and /Icon\^M/ and / Icon[^M]/ none of these is working (^M was made with ctrl-V + ctrl-M) Is it an hopeless situation ? Loren M. Lang a écrit : On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 12:10:00PM +0200, OmBreNoiRe wrote: Hi ! I would like t

Re: [Samba] security = share

Le 29/03/2010 21:54, Jeremy Allison a écrit : On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 09:45:06PM +0200, Cassian Braconnier wrote: Hi, in "Using Samba" by G. Carter, J Ts and R. Eckstein, 3rd edition, on chapter 5, page 113, I ses that the security = share option is "deprecated". It is said that "there is a

[Samba] [samba4] error at startup

Hi, When I try to run samba4 it doesn't output any errors but if i do an nmap portscan I see that some samba ports are not open, ex. 88 and 443 but others are like 135,139 and 445 are opened when I launch samba4. This ofcourse results in that samba4 doesn't work as a DC. I tried running samba wi

[Samba] NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_GROUP

I have an issue where a user cannot connect to a specific samba group. I've tried connecting directly from Windows, and via smbclient. via smbclient I get smbclient '\\SERVER NAME\Skin_FTP' -U username Password: Domain=[EP] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.2.5] tree connect failed: NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_