Hi,
I have a quite simple setup for a particular customer that loves
redundancy and failover.
PDC + BDC with LDAP Passwords on two 389-ds in multimaster node +
several samba member servers
Actually pointing singularly on both the systems everything works great.
As soon as I modify my passdb
I don't think Samba (depending on the version) supports multiple ldap
backends.You should have samba_server_1 using ldap_server_1 and
samba_server_2 using ldap_server_2.
-Original Message-
From: samba-boun...@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-boun...@lists.samba.org]
On Behalf Of
The matter is that, since the manual indicates so, it should be
supported and delegated to the ldap api in use...
The openldap api supports rebinding. The proof of it is that if in
/etc/ldap.conf I put in the uri 2 ldap servers everything works fine.
The matter seems that samba, even using such an
On 2012-03-30 3:18 AM, steve st...@steve-ss.com wrote:
El 29/03/12 22:36, Miguel Medalha escribió:
Charles wrote:
The stuff in t he roaming profiles (very little) is copied back/forth
at login/out, the stuff in t he redirected folders is *synchronized*
at all times using the Offline Files
On 2012-03-30 12:35 PM, Charles Marcus cmar...@media-brokers.com wrote:
I was simply pointing out that the *default* behavior was to always
cache all data in redirected folders on the local client using the tried
and true 'offline files' technology, but in a different way with respect
to
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012, Gaiseric Vandal wrote:
I don't think Samba (depending on the version) supports multiple ldap
backends.You should have samba_server_1 using ldap_server_1 and
samba_server_2 using ldap_server_2.
Samba most certainly does support multiple LDAP backends. There's even an
I'm exactly using that, without luck...
--
Massimiliano Perantoni
site: http://www.perantoni.net
Il 31 marzo 2012 15:35, Steve Thompson s...@vgersoft.com ha scritto:
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012, Gaiseric Vandal wrote:
I don't think Samba (depending on the version) supports multiple ldap
backends.
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012, Massimiliano Perantoni wrote:
I'm exactly using that, without luck...
Not sure what to tell you; I have used multiple LDAP servers in the past
with success, although these days I use a single virtual LDAP server which
load balances across a set of backend servers. What
Well, did not try, but guess it happens the same.
Just for completeness, which version of samba did you use for ldap failover?
Il 31 marzo 2012 19:04, Steve Thompson s...@vgersoft.com ha scritto:
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012, Massimiliano Perantoni wrote:
I'm exactly using that, without luck...
Not
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012, Massimiliano Perantoni wrote:
Well, did not try, but guess it happens the same.
Just for completeness, which version of samba did you use for ldap failover?
I was using 3.0.33 at the time, on CentOS 5 x86_64. Not sure which
revision of CentOS; it was a while ago.
Steve
Am 31.03.2012 20:56, schrieb Steve Thompson:
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012, Massimiliano Perantoni wrote:
Well, did not try, but guess it happens the same.
Just for completeness, which version of samba did you use for ldap
failover?
I was using 3.0.33 at the time, on CentOS 5 x86_64. Not sure which
The branch, master has been updated
via 7d3c26e Make sure we claim that a DACL or SACL is present if the SD
says so
from 786cb13 Fix an IPv6 breakage I introduced by adding an strlcpy
truncation check. Found by Matthieu Patou m...@samba.org.
The branch, master has been updated
via 0aacdbf s3-aio-fork: Fix a segfault in vfs_aio_fork
via 7f7c2d7 s3-aio-fork: Fix aio_suspend event hierarchy
via aef8698 s3-aio-fork: Fix an alignment warning on OS/X
from 7d3c26e Make sure we claim that a DACL or SACL is
13 matches
Mail list logo
