I don't have any address book in my ldap server. But since every email
account that I assign to each uid embedded as a paramater for one, I just
have to configure email client's contact directory account (at least in
windows 7's winmail; but itu should work with thunderbird, outlook express
or
Dear list,
Is there a reason for not having use sendfile= true in default
configuration for 3.6 or 4.0 ?
Regards,
Dragos
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Hello,
On Thursday, March 07, 2013 09:47:21 AM Michael Wood wrote:
Hi
On 6 March 2013 19:09, Ali Bendriss ali.bendr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday, March 06, 2013 06:50:46 PM Michael Wood wrote:
Hi
On 6 March 2013 16:43, Ali Bendriss ali.bendr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Hiya Joeri,
I had exactly the same problem with OpenSolaris - would not find the
interfaces.
However I found that if I explicitly defined the interfaces in the smb.conf
file:
interfaces = if.ip.add.ress/netmask_bits
if.ip.other.address/netmask_bits
Samba was quite happy to pick that
Hiya Phil,
Thanks for the thanks, and you're most welcome :-) Even if it didn't provide
you with a solution, hopefully it gave you some insight into what was going on.
I'm really glad the simpler solution worked, and equally glad you've now got it
all working - well done.
Now just remember
Hi Tris,
Thank you for your reply! Really helpful.
I'm suspecting that my problem had something to do with virtualbox.
I deployed it today on a normal physical machine and it worked
immediatly, without the interfaces line.
I'll try again the interfaces line on my virtual machine.
Thanks.
joeri
Hi,
My OpenIndiana (opensolaris) machine is joined to Active Directory.
I'm using samba 3.6.12 from OpenCSW.
wbinfo -u is working fine, getent was not working in the beginning,
but after some fiddling with libraries it was working ( I had to
create the following two symbolic links, not sure if
Hiya Joeri,
Thank you for your reply! Really helpful.
You're most welcome - hope it helps!
I'm suspecting that my problem had something to do with virtualbox.
I deployed it today on a normal physical machine and it worked immediatly,
without the interfaces line.
I think it might possibly be
Hi
On 7 March 2013 11:40, Ali Bendriss ali.bendr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
On Thursday, March 07, 2013 09:47:21 AM Michael Wood wrote:
Hi
On 6 March 2013 19:09, Ali Bendriss ali.bendr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday, March 06, 2013 06:50:46 PM Michael Wood wrote:
Hi
On 6 March
Hey Metthew,
I think you might have a chance.
Did you try clearing binary data stored by samba? There's a whole bunch
of stuff in tdb files in potentially more than one place (on Debian it's
under /var/lib/samba). Parts are temporary data and safe to remove.
Thereof cached data, connection data
Hi All,
I've been running a large school network (~800 PCs/Macs) using Samba3/LDAP
and like pretty much everyone on this list am too evaluating Samba4.
However, today's problem is not AD related...
I've set up a Samba/CUPS printer system for our school and I've got a
problem - has anyone got any
Hello,
I've seen this upgrade error posted before:
https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2013-January/171022.html
but either there is a different issue or I'm misreading the post.
Basically when I run the classicupgrade (samba3 to 4) on a test machine,
I get the following (the full debug
Hello,
Some mischief happened and I have been asked if I can find out who was
logged into their computers within a specific off-hours time frame. My
logs for that time frame happened to be running at debug level 3, so I
have been looking through them and trying to figure out how to recognize
a
Yes.
Under /var/log/samba in a typical distro you will find the log files for
each IP address/workstation connected to the samba server.
You could then use egrep to go through the files and look for various
logins.
A typical example would be:
egrep -in gcarter|Mar 5 log*
The above
Thanks Gregory,
I appreciate your answer, but this isn't quite what I am looking for.
I am using samba4 compiled from source, and I am using daemontools to
run it, so all the logs are being captured on stdout and dumped into a
file, but I understand your point about where the logs are and how to
Have you tried something like tail -f log.samba tmp.log.samba
and immediately logging into workstation to see exactly how it gets logged?
If your server is processing a lot of requests you may have a bunch of
lines to dig through, but I think it would be much easier than a complete
log file.
On
FYI - you may want to add something like 'log file =
/tmp/samba/%m.samba.log' to your smb.conf. This way samba will create
individual log files for each system.
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 6:32 PM, Thomas Simmons twsn...@gmail.com wrote:
Have you tried something like tail -f log.samba tmp.log.samba
Pardon me for butting in, and probably you've already considered this,
but what the heck.
Do you even know that the user actually logged in during the time in
question? I suppose the logs will at least let you know *if* anyone
did login, but if the trouble-maker used an already logged in station
Good point.
One further, since we are on the discussion.
Whatever, mischief you say happened, requires for something to have been
changed on the samba server if you have the audit trail turned on for
your shares.
If you haven't done that already, I suggest you turn on the share
auditing
Am Freitag, 8. März 2013, 02:25:56 schrieb Gregory Carter:
Good point.
One further, since we are on the discussion.
Whatever, mischief you say happened, requires for something to have been
changed on the samba server if you have the audit trail turned on for
your shares.
If you haven't
The share auditing is an excellent point. I was not actually aware that
those existed, so thank you for bringing this to my attention, and yes I
will be setting that up. But they are not applicable in this case.
The reason to establish if someone logged into the network is to
determine who
If I may make a suggestion.
If you are worried about presence, use Biometrics.
Logins for office wouldn't work for example if there is a VPN, which
will not prove presence.
Biometrics though can prove identity and presence to a higher degree of
precision.
Video is nice to have, but too
Hi,
I have an odd issue where I'm getting auth request failure errors for all
my Windows 7 machines. The strange thing is that everything appears to be
functioning perfectly. I can add machines to the domain, log in as domain
users, browse domain shares, and the machines regularly change their
On Wed, 2013-03-06 at 14:18 -0700, Saad Benateigha wrote:
I am having a problem using kerberos
I have installed samba4, and it appears to work correctly
However I want to create a service principle
and every time I try to use
kadmin -p admin
I get this error:
Database error!
On Wed, 2013-03-06 at 12:45 +0100, BOTZ Franck (Informaticien) - DDT
67/SG/MGI/CI wrote:
Hi !
I want to trust a 2003 domain on my S4 PDC
The final is to access shares on 2003 domain
How do i do this ?
You can join a new Samba 4.0 AD DC to your Windows 2003 domain with
'samba-tool domain
On Thu, 2013-02-28 at 22:33 +, Tris Mabbs wrote:
Hiya Günther,
Absolutely - I'm really sorry, I intended to try this today but haven't had
the chance.
Hopefully I will get the chance tomorrow, and I'll let you know the results.
Many thanks, much appreciated :-)
Where did we get
The branch, master has been updated
via 93d57df vfs_catia: add my copyright
via 4b4f8f3 vfs_catia: add a sample for filename mapping to the manual
page
via 5f38125 vfs_catia: fix the completely outdated manual page
via f7a63dc vfs_catia: fix the translation to
The branch, master has been updated
via 5372571 s3:idmap: fix a debug message and lower its level
from 93d57df vfs_catia: add my copyright
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log -
commit
The branch, master has been updated
via 11d1286 Correct the name of the nss_winbind module for FreeBSD by
creating a symlink from the FreeBSD required name to the built module.
from 5372571 s3:idmap: fix a debug message and lower its level
29 matches
Mail list logo
