I think it is NO.
If you think about what bind is doing?!: bind needs to read/write in
ex.:/usr/local/samba/private/dns and reads
/usr/local/samba/private/named.conf.
In my case the named conf:
dlz AD DNS Zone {
# For BIND 9.8.0
database dlopen /usr/local/samba/lib/bind9/dlz_bind9.so;
The welcome screen? The welcome screen is first logoff and then login
again. All work of the user will be lost!?
The locked screen is an item of security and it protects the authenticated
users desktop. And as long the user
is authenticated no other users has the right to drop in.
Every other
Someone using this setup?
I do not get the system running.
The Solaris host joined successful the domain but authentification doesnt work.
Are there any step by step description.
ldaplist works
but there is no response for 'getent passwd'
elkberry
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the
Hello list,
I have a samba 3.5.6 running on a Debian squeeze machine. This box is running
since more than a year without any problems.
Since a couple of days we have the following problem.
One Win7 user doesn't get his user profile any more
The log file tells:
[2013/03/04 07:43:14.641151, 1]
DHK Hello list,
DHK I have a samba 3.5.6 running on a Debian squeeze machine. This box is
running
DHK since more than a year without any problems.
DHK Since a couple of days we have the following problem.
DHK One Win7 user doesn't get his user profile any more
DHK The log file tells:
DHK
Am Montag, 11. März 2013 schrieb Gregory Sloop:
DHK Hello list,
DHK I have a samba 3.5.6 running on a Debian squeeze machine. This box is
running DHK since more than a year without any problems.
DHK Since a couple of days we have the following problem.
DHK One Win7 user doesn't get his user
Hello,
the configuration below, works like a charm for WinXP Prof. Clients:
samba 3.5.6, configured as PDC, netlogon share, logon script is
users.bat. The primary group of the Domainusers is users.
the relevant parts of smb.conf:
logon script = %G.bat
[netlogon]
path =
The behaviour of windows 7 concerning logon scripts (ingroup-feature) is
quiet different to xp.
Without posting your script there is no chance to help you.
---
EDV Daniel Müller
Leitung EDV
Tropenklinik Paul-Lechler-Krankenhaus
Paul-Lechler-Str. 24
Just for testing add the following line to your [netlogon]
root preexec = echo %u is in %G /home/samba/netlogon/groupname.txt
then try a windows logon (it won't tell windows anything, but will create
the file /home/samba/netlogon/groupname.txt), then on the samba
server, cat
Hi,
The Script is a regular Dos/Windows batch file (users.bat) with net use
commands, like:
...
net use P: \\MyDomain\MySharename
...
Thanks
Mik
Am 11.03.2013 13:13, schrieb Daniel Müller:
The behaviour of windows 7 concerning logon scripts (ingroup-feature) is
quiet different to xp.
Very interesting, i tried that, but the file groupname.txt was not
created at all.
Maybe Win7 domain logon ignores the netlogon share completely?
Thanks
Mik
Am 11.03.2013 13:30, schrieb Ricky Nance:
Just for testing add the following line to your [netlogon]
root preexec = echo %u is in %G
No it does!
There should be a link to where the users has the right to write:
[homes]
...
%u preexec = echo %u is in %G /homedirectoryOfTheUser/groupname.txt
or if you leave it this should work:
root preexec = echo %u is in %G /home/samba/netlogon/groupname.txt
If all all users have the same users.bat!? Why not set:
logon script = users.bat!?
The differences per Group then could be done within this batch.
---
EDV Daniel Müller
Leitung EDV
Tropenklinik Paul-Lechler-Krankenhaus
Paul-Lechler-Str. 24
72076
Hello list,
could someone in the know please tell me if
Samba Bug #8881 (username map not working in security=ADS)
is still present in Samba 4.0.x?
Best regards,
Heinz Mueller
--
Gesendet von meinem /sent from my FSC Scenic P320 ;-)
Heinz Mueller
PBG MBG SDTS EP HE BS FUJITSU Fujitsu
i have about 100 users, with prim. group users, which should execute
users.bat
i have about 40 users, with prim. group exts, which should execute exts.bat
i have ...
yes, i could query the groupmemberships in one batch file, but i don't
want to reengineer my current logon script structure, as
On Mon, 11 Mar 2013, List Mik wrote:
Maybe Win7 domain logon ignores the netlogon share completely?
You will also need something like:
scriptPath: logon.bat
in the user's entry as well as defining it in smb.conf. It will not be
executed otherwise (as I have found by experience).
Believe me you can discuss about it or you can accept it.
To have 50 per cent of my clients setup on Windows 7 was a lot of try and
error. I had to reeingener
all my policies and scripts.
Good Luck
Daniel
---
EDV Daniel Müller
Leitung EDV
@daniel
i understand your point, but it's to early for me to accept it ;-) .
Thanks for your input.
Mik
Am 11.03.2013 14:51, schrieb Daniel Müller:
Believe me you can discuss about it or you can accept it.
To have 50 per cent of my clients setup on Windows 7 was a lot of try and
error. I had
@steve
bingo. i was missing the attribute SambaLogonScript in my ldap user.
set it to users.bat, and it worked.
scriptPath: have not found this in the man page, and in my config, i
don't need it.
Thanks to all
Mik
Am 11.03.2013 14:33, schrieb Steve Thompson:
On Mon, 11 Mar 2013, List Mik
On 03/11/2013 01:09 AM, Gregory Sloop wrote:
GR Ok I finally gave up and made something really complex: Administrator1
GR Boy, we feel really secure now.:rolleyes:
GR RANT: I wish people would stop all this complexity nonsense and
GR just let people set their passwords how they want
On 03/11/2013 03:52 AM, Daniel Müller wrote:
I think it is NO.
If you think about what bind is doing?!: bind needs to read/write in
ex.:/usr/local/samba/private/dns and reads
/usr/local/samba/private/named.conf.
In my case the named conf:
dlz AD DNS Zone {
# For BIND 9.8.0
On Mon, 11 Mar 2013, List Mik wrote:
scriptPath: have not found this in the man page, and in my config, i don't
need it.
scriptPath is the attribute name in Active Directory; it's what you
would use with Samba4.
Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
All,
When the company upgraded AD from 2003 to 2008R2 users lost the ability to
access Samba shares without being prompted for a password. I've upgraded Samba
from 3.0.30 to 3.6.6. I would like to continue using username map to map my
users however it appears the map is being ignored. The only
I've been using Samba for a number of years and suddenly Samba started
throwing oplock errors and I simply can't figure out why. I've not changed
any config parameters in some time, but have updated my version of samba as
new packages become available for my distro.
I'm running Centos 5.9 and
When I ran the provision I selected BIND9_DLZ.
The provision did not prompt me for a DNS forwarder IP.
So after the provision finished I entered the DNS forwarder IP manually into
smb.conf.
Should the provision have prompted for the DNS forwarder IP?
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to
With the BIND9_DLZ backend, bind actually handles the forwarding, so you
will need to set that up in your named conf, something like the following:
options {
forwarders { 192.249.249.1; 192.249.249.3; };
};
Although, some distros break apart the named stuff, so you may need to find
information
On 03/11/2013 12:53 PM, Ricky Nance wrote:
With the BIND9_DLZ backend, bind actually handles the forwarding, so you will
need to set that up in your named conf,
something like the following:
options {
forwarders { 192.249.249.1; 192.249.249.3; };
};
Although, some distros break apart the
On 11/03/13 16:30, Gerry Reno wrote:
When I ran the provision I selected BIND9_DLZ.
The provision did not prompt me for a DNS forwarder IP.
So after the provision finished I entered the DNS forwarder IP manually into
smb.conf.
Should the provision have prompted for the DNS forwarder IP?
hi:
I want to setup a small samba4 server with AD and file server function.
I know that samba4 AD DC has no netbios browsing support. are there other
missing functions, like winbindd or something else?
and if I install two samba4 instance, one to /usr/local/samba(for file
server), one to
Hi,
I have a problem compiling samba 4.0.3 on freebsd 9.1.
root@freebsd-san:/root/samba-4.0.3 # uname -a
FreeBSD freebsd-san 9.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE #0 r243825: Tue
Dec 4 09:23:10 UTC 2012
r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
Use ports for this, please.
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 6:32 PM, Joeri Vanthienen
m...@joerivanthienen.bewrote:
Hi,
I have a problem compiling samba 4.0.3 on freebsd 9.1.
root@freebsd-san:/root/samba-4.0.3 # uname -a
FreeBSD freebsd-san 9.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE #0 r243825: Tue
Dec 4
B0;261;0cHi there,
On Mon, 11 Mar 2013, Kevin Shaw wrote:
When the company upgraded AD from 2003 to 2008R2 users lost the
ability to access Samba shares without being prompted for a
password. I've upgraded Samba from 3.0.30 to 3.6.6. I would like to
continue using username map to map my users
Hi, I been having issue with my samba/winbind, since I update from samba
3.5 to 3.6. below is the error I am getting from my log file and the samba
config file. I am running Red Hat 6.4.
nmbd[2188]: [2013/03/10 13:25:14.327717, 0]
nmbd/nmbd_namequery.c:108(query_name_response)
Mar 10 13:25:14
This appears to be an IDMAP username mapping issue not an issue with the
username map file.
I think this is not an issue with the username map file. Thanks for the reply.
-Kevin
On Mon, 11 Mar 2013, Kevin Shaw wrote:
When the company upgraded AD from 2003 to 2008R2 users lost the
ability
On Sun, 2013-03-10 at 22:21 -0400, Gerry Reno wrote:
I am trying to provision my samba 4 domain and even though I have deactivated
password complexity using the samba-tool I
still receive this error during the provision:
ERROR(ldb): uncaught exception - 052D: Constraint violation -
On Tue, 2013-03-12 at 01:30 +0800, d tbsky wrote:
hi:
I want to setup a small samba4 server with AD and file server function.
I know that samba4 AD DC has no netbios browsing support. are there other
missing functions, like winbindd or something else?
The next release will include this
On 03/11/2013 06:32 PM, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Sun, 2013-03-10 at 22:21 -0400, Gerry Reno wrote:
I am trying to provision my samba 4 domain and even though I have
deactivated password complexity using the samba-tool I
still receive this error during the provision:
ERROR(ldb): uncaught
Since I am using views, where should I include the provision-generated
named.conf?
Just in the local network view?
-Gerry
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
On 03/11/2013 06:34 PM, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Tue, 2013-03-12 at 01:30 +0800, d tbsky wrote:
hi:
I want to setup a small samba4 server with AD and file server function.
I know that samba4 AD DC has no netbios browsing support. are there other
missing functions, like winbindd or
Sorry I don't understand what you mean by views... the provision generated
named.conf should be inserted into your /etc/named/named.conf (again this
varies on different distros) as an include directive, it is not meant to be
a full named.conf.
Ricky
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 6:16 PM, Gerry Reno
On 03/11/2013 08:27 PM, Ricky Nance wrote:
Sorry I don't understand what you mean by views... the provision generated
named.conf should be inserted into your
/etc/named/named.conf (again this varies on different distros) as an include
directive, it is not meant to be a full
named.conf.
I am not 100% sure, but anywhere in the named.conf config should be
sufficient, DLZ is Dynamically Loadable Zones, so samba ends up being its
own zone as far as I know.
Ricky
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 7:43 PM, Gerry Reno gr...@verizon.net wrote:
On 03/11/2013 08:27 PM, Ricky Nance wrote:
On 03/11/2013 08:50 PM, Ricky Nance wrote:
I am not 100% sure, but anywhere in the named.conf config should be
sufficient, DLZ is Dynamically Loadable Zones, so
samba ends up being its own zone as far as I know.
Ricky
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 7:43 PM, Gerry Reno gr...@verizon.net
I am running Solaris 10 u8 running Samba 3.6.6. Windows server 2008R2 runs AD.
I don't understand samba authentication and hope someone might be able to help
me understand the process. The following configuration appears to be
functional. NIS is running and Winbind is not. Pam.conf has not
Hi all,
The user properties does not appear to guide dialing. This feature is
available in Samba4?
Thanks
--
Celso Vianna
BSD User: 51318
http://www.bsdcounter.org
Palmas/TO
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
The branch, v3-6-test has been updated
via 17113c3 vfs_catia: new version of the manual page for samba-3.6.x
via ddb98ca vfs_catia: add my copyright
via ad8fe62 vfs_catia: fix the translation to vfs_translate_to_windows
via 58ac0d3 vfs_catia: add debug class for
The branch, v4-0-test has been updated
via e4cd11d vfs_catia: add my copyright
via 048434c vfs_catia: add a sample for filename mapping to the manual
page
via 2ebd2ca vfs_catia: fix the completely outdated manual page
via 0a719b7 vfs_catia: fix the translation to
The branch, master has been updated
via 58e385a Revert Ensure the masks don't conflict with the ACL
checks.
via fc496ef smbd:posix_acls Remove incorrectly added lp_create_mask()
and lp_dir_mask() calls
from 287b5f6 param: Remove incorrectly added defaults in AD DC allowing
The branch, master has been updated
via fb924d0 s3: remove some dead code (for setdir command)
from 58e385a Revert Ensure the masks don't conflict with the ACL
checks.
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log
The branch, master has been updated
via 389197e scripting: No longer install samba_upgradeprovision
from fb924d0 s3: remove some dead code (for setdir command)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log
50 matches
Mail list logo
