On Tue, 8 Jul 2003, Jake Johnson wrote:
Hello,
I am just curious...which is faster? Obviously if the machines are the
same size and all conditions are equal except for the OS.
samba is definitely faster. I replaced five Win2k servers at one client's
office with a single Linux box running
, with
500+ connections per server.
With the kernel binary fix, samba 2.2.7a is just as fast as 2.0.6.
Sun it releasing T-patches - T112233-04 for Solaris 9 and
T108528-19 for Solaris 8. We will be trying these out in the
next few days.
Andy Thomas
Unauthorised connection attempts to a server running samba 2.2.0a are a
daily occurrence but incorrect usernames/share names prevent accesses to
shares and this is not normally anything to worry about. But looking
through the smbd logs on this server I found one instance where someone
apparently
.
Andy Thomas
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 01:56:50 -0800 (PST)
From: Richard Sharpe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: A registry editor taking shape ...
Hi,
A registry editor, editreg, is slowly taking shape in Samba-head.
The goal is to be able to do things like:
- delete keys and values
- add
of
Solaris?
I have had a case open with Sun since Sep 18 (case # 63186243).
I asked them about it again today, and was told again that there
is no patch or t-patch available. I would appreciate any information
on this. Thank you.
Andy Thomas
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, Bob Puff@NLE wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to set up a samba server for a friend who has a mac. He's running
OSX, version 10.2. He's got some really big video editing files that are well
in excess of 2gb. We're trying to back these up to the samba server, but it
quits
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, David Brodbeck wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Bob Puff@NLE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
You sure about that? I'm pretty sure I've had 2gb files on
my ext3 drives,
2.4.x kernel.
RedHat Linux 7.0 with all current RedHat bugfixes and glibc upgrades.
I installed SuSE Linux 7.3 for Sparc on an old Sun and while everything
works fine, I just cannot get the bundled pre-built sambe to do anything
meaningful. It runs but on checking the shares using 'smbclient -L localhost'
I get the following error message:
Domain=[STATS] OS=[Unix]
need help testing or debugging, let me know.
Andy Thomas
Hi,
I envision the profiles program being able to pull the domain SID out of
NTUSER.DAT and then being able to update every SID that matches on the
domain part to a new domain SID.
This could be used when copying profiles over
. For bug report 4700402, they say it
is closed, and say the work around is to compile with --with-spinlocks.
Andy Thomas
Message: 5
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 15:10:24 +
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL
From: Nathaniel N.Petersen (CNS Student Support) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 08:15:07 -0500
There is nothing wrong with using the homes directories like I do. The
lines refered to in the man pages simply don't recommend it. Well, if
you have ever worked for a University, you
On 30 May 2002, Paul Harrington wrote:
Can someone point me to an FAQ, or tell me how to access shared PC
drives from Solaris 8?
I've heard of the smbclient thing - does this allow seamless access - ie
can I run this, then say cd /sharedpc/c/somefolder?
Not as far as I know - it behaves
fcntl/sec). Some truss output is included below.
Andy Thomas
fcntl(14, F_SETLKW64, 0xFFBEEBA8) = 0
typ=F_UNLCK whence=SEEK_SET start=176 len=1 sys=4776504 pid=0
fcntl(14, F_SETLKW64, 0xFFBEEB48) = 0
typ=F_WRLCK whence=SEEK_SET start=176 len=1
13 matches
Mail list logo
